Global BulletinAll NewsFDA Approval AlertWomen in Oncology
Expert InterviewsAround the PracticeBetween the LinesFace OffFrom All AnglesMeeting of the MindsOncViewPodcastsTraining AcademyTreatment Algorithms with the Oncology BrothersVideos
Conferences
All JournalsEditorial BoardFor AuthorsYear in Review
Frontline ForumSatellite Sessions
CME/CE
Awareness MonthNurse Practitioners/Physician's AssistantsPartnersSponsoredSponsored Media
Career CenterSubscribe
Adverse Effects
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
Lymphoma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
Spotlight -
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Surgery
Adverse Effects
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
Lymphoma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
    • Conferences
    • CME/CE
    • Career Center
    • Subscribe

Your AI-Trained Oncology Knowledge Connection!

scout
Advertisement

Decline in HPV-Related Cervical Cancer May Inform Screening and Vaccination Guidance for Other Tumor Types

May 20, 2021
By Audrey Sternberg
News
Article
Conference|American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting (ASCO)

Seventeen years of data indicate that HPV-related cervical cancer incidence is declining, but other tumors related to the virus persist.

Evidence from a population-based study on the incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)–related cancers indicate a marked decline in cervical carcinoma, potentially due to clear guidance regarding screening measures and HPV vaccination for vulnerable patient groups.1,2

On the other hand, the incidence of other HPV-related cancers without clear screening guidelines are on the rise in both men and women.

“In young women, cervical carcinoma is decreasing consistently with screening, and possibly vaccination, at the population level,” lead author Cheng-I Liao, MD, of Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital in Kaohsiung, Taiwan, said during a presentation of the data during a media briefing leading up to the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2021 Annual Meeting.

HPV is associated with more than 90% of cervical and anal cancers and 60% to 75% of oropharyngeal, vulvar, vaginal, and penile tumors.3 The purpose of the study was to assess trends in the incidence of HPV-associated cancer using the United States Cancer Statistics Database from 2001 to 2017.

In the 17-year timeframe, there were 657,317 cases of cancer, 393,298 (60%) of which were in women. The most commonly occurring cancer in female patients was cervical carcinoma (52%). In men (n = 264,019), the most common malignancy was oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC; 80%), which represents a 5-fold higher incidence compared with women.

Over the study period, cervical cancer incidence decreased by 1.03% per year (P <.05), but this rate was significantly higher in patients aged 20 to 24 years who saw a much greater decrease in disease incidence, at 4.63% per years. Similar effects were seen in women over the age of 65, who saw a greater than 2% incidence decline over the study period (P <.05). The investigators said this is likely due to the effects of HPV vaccination and screening.

However, other HPV-related cancers without standardized screening guidelines saw increases over the study period, with a 2.71% incidence rise per year in men and a 0.77% increase in women. Other HPV-associated cancers included anal and rectal SCC, oropharyngeal SCC, penile cancer, vulvar SCC, and vaginal SCC.

In women over the age of 50, the annual percentage change in the incidence of anal and rectal SCC was 3.55% (P <.001). When compared with the 1.53% decline in the incidence of cervical cancer in the same patient population (P <.001), trends suggest that HPV-related anal and rectal SCC will surpass its incidence in the coming decade, and likely in the next 5 years.

“The decrease in cervical cancer is welcome news and may reflect intensive efforts to screen and vaccinate patients at risk,” ASCO President Lori J. Pierce, MD, FASTRO, FASCO, said in a press release. “Clearly, this study shows that we still have a great deal of work to do in order to reverse the increasing incidence rates of other HPV-related cancers.”

The investigators plan to gather information from other databases about the rate of HPV testing and vaccination. Additional research will be necessary to tackle a lack of disease screening and vaccination recommendations for HPV-associated cancers other than cervical.

References

1. HPV associated cancers in the US over the last 17 years – has screening or vaccination made any difference? Presented at: 2021 ASCO Annual Meeting Virtual Embargoed Presscast; May 19, 2021; Virtual.

2. With Strong Screening and Vaccination Guidelines, Cervical Cancer Rates Drop; Other HPV-Related Cancers Are on the Rise. News release. American Society of Clinical Oncology. May 19, 2021. Accessed May 19, 2021. https://bit.ly/3ylfjJ1

3. Saraiya M, Unger ER, Thompson TD, et al. US assessment of HPV types in cancers: implications for current and 9-valent HPV vaccines. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(6):djv086. doi:10.1093/jnci/djv086

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Subscribe Now!
Recent Videos
Related Content

No new safety signals were identified with subcutaneous amivantamab in EGFR-mutant NSCLC, and infusion reactions were reduced vs the IV formulation.

SC Amivantamab Consistent with IV Formulation in EGFR-Mutated NSCLC

Roman Fabbricatore
September 11th 2025
Article

Man Up? The Truth About Men's Health After Cancer

Man Up? The Truth About Men's Health After Cancer

Daniel C. McFarland, DO;Christian J. Nelson, PhD
September 11th 2025
Podcast

The complete response (CR) rate was 51.4% with M-Pola vs 24.3% with R-GemOx, respectively.

What Makes M-Pola Superior to R-GemOx in Transplant-Ineligible LBCL?

Tim Cortese
September 11th 2025
Article

Geraldine O’Sullivan Coyne, MD, MRCPI, PhD, discusses how the START center may expand access to novel therapies for patients who reside in a community.

START Center Aims to Bring New Cancer Treatments, Trials to the Community

Geraldine O’Sullivan Coyne, MD, MRCPI, PhD
September 11th 2025
Podcast

We found that patients who are [complete remission] MRD-negative, and PET/CT negative year after year for 5 years do not have to be maintained.

Evaluating the Proximity and Impact of a Cure in Multiple Myeloma

Tim Cortese
September 11th 2025
Article

Rezatapopt Yields Responses Across TP53 Y220C-Mutated Solid Tumor Types

Rezatapopt Yields Responses Across TP53 Y220C-Mutated Solid Tumor Types

Tim Cortese
September 11th 2025
Article
Related Content

No new safety signals were identified with subcutaneous amivantamab in EGFR-mutant NSCLC, and infusion reactions were reduced vs the IV formulation.

SC Amivantamab Consistent with IV Formulation in EGFR-Mutated NSCLC

Roman Fabbricatore
September 11th 2025
Article

Man Up? The Truth About Men's Health After Cancer

Man Up? The Truth About Men's Health After Cancer

Daniel C. McFarland, DO;Christian J. Nelson, PhD
September 11th 2025
Podcast

The complete response (CR) rate was 51.4% with M-Pola vs 24.3% with R-GemOx, respectively.

What Makes M-Pola Superior to R-GemOx in Transplant-Ineligible LBCL?

Tim Cortese
September 11th 2025
Article

Geraldine O’Sullivan Coyne, MD, MRCPI, PhD, discusses how the START center may expand access to novel therapies for patients who reside in a community.

START Center Aims to Bring New Cancer Treatments, Trials to the Community

Geraldine O’Sullivan Coyne, MD, MRCPI, PhD
September 11th 2025
Podcast

We found that patients who are [complete remission] MRD-negative, and PET/CT negative year after year for 5 years do not have to be maintained.

Evaluating the Proximity and Impact of a Cure in Multiple Myeloma

Tim Cortese
September 11th 2025
Article

Rezatapopt Yields Responses Across TP53 Y220C-Mutated Solid Tumor Types

Rezatapopt Yields Responses Across TP53 Y220C-Mutated Solid Tumor Types

Tim Cortese
September 11th 2025
Article
Advertisement
About
Advertise
CureToday.com
OncLive.com
OncNursingNews.com
TargetedOnc.com
Editorial
Contact
Terms and Conditions
Privacy
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Contact Info

259 Prospect Plains Rd, Bldg H,
Monroe, NJ 08831

609-716-7777

© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.