Effective Rx for KRAS-mutated colon cancer

Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 19 No 3
Volume 19
Issue 3

A primer on managing the chemorefractory patient from Eric Van Cutsem, MD, PhD.

ABSTRACT: A primer on managing the chemorefractory patient from Eric Van Cutsem, MD, PhD.

ORLANDO-Unlike their wildtype counterparts, colorectal cancer tumors that harbor mutations in the KRAS gene do not respond to treatment with EGFR monoclonal antibodies. Fortunately, novel approaches to improve outcomes are in the pipeline, according to world-renowned expert Eric Van Cutsem, MD, PhD, speaking at the 2010 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium.

KRAS is a validated marker for predicting resistance to anti-EGFR antibodies in CRC. The activity of cetuximab (Erbitux) and panitumumab (Vectibix) is confined to KRAS wild-type metastatic CRC. However, KRAS does not predict for efficacywith bevacizumab (Avastin), as shown in a study in which risk of progression was reduced by 59% with IFL (irinotecan [Camptosar], 5-FU, leucovorin) plus bevacizumab in the KRAS-mutant population and by 56% in the wild-type population (The Oncologist 14:22-28, 2009).

©ASCO/Todd Buchanan 2009

"This has important therapeutic implications," said Dr. Van Cutsem, who is a professor of internal medicine at the University of Leuven in Belgium and head of the division of digestive oncology at the University Hospital Gasthuisberg. "For KRAS-mutant patients, first-line treatment of metastatic CRC is a cytotoxic doublet plus bevacizumab. But after chemotherapy plus bevacizumab, in the chemorefractory patient, what do we use next? There is an unmet need here. We need trials to explore tumor pathways and integrate this knowledge into the development of new agents for this tumor type."

KRAS is not prognostic

KRAS does not have a prognostic role in stage II and III CRC, which was recently validated in a translational study of more than 1,400 tumor samples (J Clin Oncol 28:466-474, 2010).

In contrast, BRAF, which is mutated in 6% to 10% of CRC, has strong prognostic significance as shown in the CRYSTAL trial, in which the overall survival (OS) benefi t was dependent upon BRAF wildtype status (ASCO 2007 abstract 4000).

At the 2010 GI Symposium, Dr. Van Cutsem reported the analysis of the BRAF subset among the 666 KRAS wild-type patients in CRYSTAL. Among all patients receiving FOLFIRI plus cetuximab, the median OS was 23.5 months. By subset, OS was 25.1 months for those with BRAF wild-type tumors and 14.1 months for patients with BRAF mutations. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.9 months overall, 10.9 months for BRAF wild-type patients, and eight months for patient with BRAF mutations, he reported (abstract 281).

Other markers are under scrutiny to explain why wild-type tumors do not always respond to anti-EGFR antibodies. One possibility is the quadruple mutation profi le of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA, which is associated with lack of response.

Overcoming resistance

Strategies for treating KRAS-mutated tumors must address the complex networking and feedback loops in the signaling pathway, Dr. Van Cutsem said. A number of approaches are currently being evaluated (see Table).

RAF inhibitors and MEK inhibitors target molecules downstream of KRAS. RAF can be inhibited with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs); however, results have been negative with single-agent sorafenib (Nexavar). the drug's activity is being revisited in combination studies.

PLX 4032 was found to dramatically improve response rates and symptoms in advanced melanoma patients with BRAF V600E mutations in a phase I study presented last year (ECCO/ESMO 2009 abstract 6LBA). The response rate at the highest dose level was 70%, and median progression-free survival has not been reached. "It is logical to try this compound in CRC," Dr. Van Cutsem said. BMS 908662 (XL 281) and RAF 265 are other RAF inhibitors in development.

For MEK inhibition, several compounds are in randomized trials, mostly in combination with chemotherapy, for CRC and pancreatic and biliary tract cancers. these include AZD 6244, PD0325901, XL518, and MSC19363698. In a xenograft study, MSC19363698 plus irinotecan markedly inhibited tumor growth. The compound is being studied in CRC in combination with FOLFIRI in the second-line setting in the EMR200066-004 phase II trial.

The GI Cancers Symposium was sponsored by ASCO, ASTRO, the American Gastroenterological Association, and the Society of Surgical Oncology.

One of the targets of the PI3K/AKT/ mTOR pathway is the type 1 insulin growth factor receptor (IGF-1R), which is expressed in 90% of CRC. Antibodies and TKIs for this target are in development. Since the relationship of IGF-1R and KRAS is still unclear, these agents are also being examined in KRAS wildtype tumors.

Lenalidomide (Revlimid) enhances antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (a mechanism by which antibodies kill cancer cells) of cetuximab but not panitumumab. The value of lenalidomide with and without cetuximab is being evaluated in 220 chemorefractory KRAS-mutant patients in the COLO-001 trial.

For the 85% of patients in the first-line metastatic setting who need or desire aggressive therapy, Dr. Van Cutsem first determines KRAS status. then for wildtype tumors, he treats with a doublet plus cetuximab or bevacizumab. For mutant tumors, he prescribes a doublet plus bevacizumab. Patients who reject aggressive treatment receive 5-FU plus capecitabine (Xeloda) with or without bevacizumab, he said.

Related Videos
Stacey A. Cohen, MD, and Daniel H. Ahn, DO, presenting slides
Stacey A. Cohen, MD, and Daniel H. Ahn, DO, presenting slides
4 KOLs are featured in this panel.
4 KOLs are featured in this panel.
4 KOLs are featured in this panel.
4 KOLs are featured in this panel.
Immunotherapy may be an “elegant” method of managing colorectal cancer, says Gregory Charak, MD.
Administering neoadjuvant therapy to patients with colorectal cancer may help surgical oncologists attain a negative-margin resection.
Increasing screening for younger individuals who are at risk of colorectal cancer may help mitigate the rising early incidence of this disease.
Laparoscopy may reduce the degree of pain or length of hospital stay compared with open surgery for patients with colorectal cancer.
Related Content