
Publication|Articles|August 27, 2024
- ONCOLOGY® Companion, Volume 38, Supplement 8
- Volume 38
- Issue 8
- Pages: 8
Evaluating the Use of CAR T-Cell Therapy for Multiple Myeloma in Academic and Community Settings
Author(s)ONCOLOGY Staff
Strategies for treating patients with multiple myeloma who are eligible to receive CAR T-cell therapy in either community or academic practices were discussed in a recent Training Academy.
Advertisement
In a recent Training Academy program hosted by CancerNetwork®, a panel of experts in multiple myeloma highlighted treatment strategies for patients who are eligible to receive chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and described critical processes associated with patients transitioning between community practices and academic centers. The panel discussed topics ranging from optimally timing leukapheresis to monitoring patients for neurotoxicity throughout the treatment course. Here are their key takeaways:
Determining Suitable Conditions for CAR T-Cell Therapy
- The role of the immune system in anticancer therapy has become more widely acknowledged, making conversations with patients about eligibility for CAR T-cell therapy easier.
- CAR T-cell therapy may not be as effective in those with high-risk genetics; age may also influence efficacy.
- Community oncologists may share treatment decision-making with their colleagues in academic centers.
- Some patients may prefer to receive close monitoring in a community setting while undergoing bridging therapy.
- Transportation issues may also make treatment in a community setting more suitable.
- Deferring to academic colleagues may be suitable in the case of aggressive early-line disease.
Administering CAR T Cells at Academic Centers
- Triaging patients for potential CAR T-cell therapy at academic centers is dependent on the extent of their disease relapse.
- Patients with standard-risk disease may receive several triplet therapy options.
- Patients with functionally high-risk disease and quick relapses may be prioritized for CAR T-cell therapy.
- Patients who receive CAR T-cell therapy may be able to return to community centers soon following the window for cytokine release syndrome or immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome.
- Patients may return as soon as 4 weeks following infusion if their counts have adequately recovered.
- Count recovery following CAR T-cell therapy, however, may take as long as 3 months.
Monitoring Neurotoxicity and Ensuring Treatment Access
- It may be necessary to develop a systematic approach to monitor for potential neurotoxicity such as parkinsonism.
- Academic oncologists can educate their community colleagues about these adverse effects.
- Patients should also be educated on potential signs of toxicity.
- Ensuring that patients can access CAR T-cell therapy is an ongoing challenge.
- Academic practices may offer housing options on campus for patients.
- Having conversations with insurance providers may also financially assist with having patients in proximity to a treatment center.
Articles in this issue
Advertisement
Related to this article

In a phase 2 trial, CD38-targeted immune-PET detected active multiple myeloma in some patients with no signs of disease on standard fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT.

“If it is successful, you should be able to access this combination wherever you are,” said Natalie S. Callander, MD, of the UW Carbone Cancer Center.

Israel approved nogapendekin alfa inbakicept plus BCG for BCG-unresponsive NMIBC with CIS, expanding access beyond the US, UK, EU, Saudi Arabia, and UAE.

At The Liver Meeting 2026, Ryosuke Tateishi, MD, PhD, discussed what the US and Japan can learn from each other to prevent liver cancer.

Posters at The Liver Meeting 2026 refined HCC risk stratification in hepatitis delta or after HCV cure and examined ICI liver injury in cirrhosis.

A dual bispecific regimen of pasritamig and JNJ-9401 reduced PSA by at least 50% in 73% of heavily pretreated patients with metastatic CRPC.

In pooled phase 1/2 data, the PD-1/VEGF bispecific antibody cesalatamig produced a 33% objective response rate in PD-(L)1–resistant/refractory NSCLC.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on CancerNetwork
1
Azacitidine Plus Ruxolitinib Shows Durable Responses in Myelofibrosis
2
Defining the Optimal Window for Cytoreductive SABR in Metastatic Kidney Cancer
3
Building Systems to Catch Liver and Other Cancers in Patients With MASLD
4
Rusfertide Improves Hematocrit Control vs Placebo in Polycythemia Vera
5

