MRD Tracking May Allow More ‘Individualized’ Management of Multiple Myeloma

Video

C. Ola Landgren, MD, PhD, illustrated how minimal residual disease tracking may allow greater treatment personalization in the future.

In an interview with CancerNetwork®, C. Ola Landgren, MD, PhD, touched on one of the most important issues that went undiscussed during a recent Around the Practice® program: the future of minimal residual disease (MRD) tracking in multiple myeloma.

Landgren is a professor of hematology, chief of the Myeloma Section, leader of the Experimental Therapeutics Program, and co-leader of the Tumor Biology Program at the University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Program. He spoke about how treatment intensity could be determined by MRD status in the future, which may yield improvements in efficacy.

He also remarked on other potential developments in MRD tracking, including the development of blood-based tests. Through this, he predicted an increase in individualized disease management in the future.

Transcript:

We covered many of the important trends in the field today, [but] one thing we didn’t talk much about is the utility of MRD tracking. As these technologies become [more] available, even [in the form of] blood-based tests, they will help the field [move] forward. We will [likely] see more individualized [disease] management; patients will have the intensity of their therapy increased or decreased based on MRD status. [For example], for a patient who is MRD-negative after a certain number of cycles, you could [consider] decreasing [therapy] and [switching] to maintenance. Conversely, if there is evidence of rising markers, the patient would convert back to MRD positivity, [which] in the future may trigger [the use of] some newer therapies. Basically, it will be a molecular relapse. That’s how I envision the field going forward.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
A study aimed to determine the variables that correlated with extravasation rates in patients receiving radiation injection therapy.
Extravasation with beta emitters may elicit more drastic adverse effects due to their higher radiation dose.
Increasing the use of patient-reported outcomes may ensure that practitioners can fully ascertain the impact of treatment for rare lymphomas.
Photographic and written documentation can help providers recognize inflammatory breast cancer symptoms across diverse populations.
The use of guideline-concordant care in breast cancer appears to be more common in White populations than Black populations.
Retrospective and real-world registry studies may be necessary to guide clinical decision-making for rarer lymphomas with insufficient prospective data.
Extravasation results in exposing healthy tissue to radiation, which can be highly dosed depending on the isotope used for treatment.
Ongoing studies seek to evaluate immunotherapy in earlier lines of therapy for patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma.
Related Content