Oncologists Need to Rely Upon NPs, PAs, and NPPs to Overcome Workforce Problems

News
Video

Eric P. Winer, MD, said, “[Health care] has a workforce problem, which is part of the reason why we need to embrace nurse practitioners and PAs or APPs.”

There is a workforce problem in health care and cancer care specifically. This is precisely why Eric P. Winer, MD, believes the system needs to embrace and incorporate nurse practitioners (NPs), physician assistants (PAs), and advanced practice providers (APPs) into the care model.

Regarding this problem in the workforce, Winer mentioned that 23% of oncologists are 64 years or older and nearing retirement age whereas only 14% of oncologists are younger than 40 years. These numbers came from a snapshot of the oncology workforce published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. Though these numbers may not directly reflect what changes may happen to the workforce, Winer reiterated that the workforce still needs to expand.

One of the major reasons for this, according to him, is that as treatment has become more advanced and improved survival outcomes, patients have started to live longer and require treatment for longer durations of time.

Compared with when Winer was a younger breast cancer physician and there were far fewer options for treatment, the available resources now make it so patients with active cancer can live for anywhere from 5 to 20 years.

Winer is the director of Yale Cancer Center, president and physician in chief at Smilow Cancer Hospital, deputy dean for cancer research and Alfred Gilman Professor of Pharmacology and Professor of Medicine at Yale School of Medicine, chair of the association board for the American Society of Clinical Oncology, and one of the authors on the survey.

Transcript:

We have a workforce problem, which is part of the reason why we need to embrace [NPs] and PAs or APPs. We need to incorporate them into the care model. There are more oncologists who are nearing retirement age; I’m told, based on ASCO [American Society of Clinical Oncology] work, that 23% of oncologists say they’re nearing retirement age whereas only 14% are under the age of 40. I don’t know that those 2 groups are equal, so there may be people in their late 50s who are going to work for another decade who say they’re nearing retirement age. We are concerned about the fact that, if anything, the oncology workforce needs to expand, because people are living longer with active cancer and they need care—there’s that much more we can do for people. There’s not necessarily an increase in the number of people going into oncology.

When I was a young breast cancer doctor, we didn’t have a lot of treatments. No. 1, everything was much simpler because there were only a few choices, and No. 2, because we only had a few choices, people didn’t live as long when they had incurable cancer. Now there are people who live for 5, 10, 15, and 20 years with active cancer. Our practices get filled up, not by new patients but by all the people who need care and whom we’re taking care of.

References

2023 snapshot: state of the oncology workforce in America. JCO Oncol Pract. 2025;21(3):438. doi:10.1200/OP.24.00262

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Response rates appeared to be higher with avutometinib plus defactinib vs avutometinib alone in the phase 2 RAMP 201 study.
Patients who respond to avutometinib/defactinib may be maintained on treatment for long periods of time, says Rachel N. Grisham, MD.
Treatment with lorlatinib might be effective regardless of the presence of central nervous system metastases, according to Misako Nagasaka, MD, PhD.
Most central nervous system events with lorlatinib were grade 1 or 2 in the phase 3 CROWN trial.
Treatment with lorlatinib did not increase cardiovascular events among patients with ALK-positive non–small cell lung cancer in the CROWN trial.
Related Content