Stereotactic Radiation Offers ‘Another Modality’ for the Management of Metastatic Kidney Cancer, Says Expert

Video

An expert from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas emphasized that stereotactic radiation provides oncologists with an alternative modality for treating patients with kidney cancer for whom standard ablative surgery is not an option.

Community urologists should consider stereotactic radiation therapy as another clinically useful tool for treating patients with kidney cancer, according to Raquibul Hannan, MD, PhD, a professor in the Department of Radiation Oncology, Urology and Immunology at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas.

During the 2022 Society for Urologic Oncology (SUO) Annual Meeting, CancerNetwork® spoke with Hannan regarding his presentation on the use of stereotactic radiation for managing metastatic kidney cancer.

Hannan suggests that stereotactic radiation therapy would be beneficial in cases where patients with metastatic kidney cancer are ineligible or unsuitable for receiving treatment with ablation or surgery.

“For all of those patients, [community urologists] should keep in mind that stereotactic radiation is there,” he said.

Transcript:

The community urologists should really take [stereotactic radiation] as another modality, another arsenal at their disposal to help their patients. Some patients are definitely not candidates [for surgery]. Some patients have bigger tumors that are not applicable for treatment with ablation. Some patients are just too frail to go through surgery, or they may have only a single kidney that [for which] nephrectomy is not possible. For all of those patients, they should keep in mind that stereotactic radiation is there. That offers more than 90% local control, and it is something that they can offer to their patients.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Success with the 177Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy would be transformative for the clear cell renal cell carcinoma treatment landscape.
An ongoing phase 1 trial seeks to prove XmAb819 as an effective treatment and ENPP3 as a plausible target in patients with relapsed or refractory RCC.
“The therapy is designed to prevent both CAR T-cell inactivation and to restore the anti-tumor immunity of the white blood cells that have gotten through the tumor,” said Marasco, MD, PhD.
Ongoing studies aim to combine base immunotherapy regimens with novel agents to potentially improve outcomes among patients with kidney cancer.
Investigators have found a way to reduce liver and biliary toxicity when targeting the molecule CAIX in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Neoantigen-targeting vaccines resulted in an absence of recurrence in 9 patients with high-risk kidney cancer, according to David A. Braun, MD, PhD.
The Kidney Cancer Research Consortium may allow collaborators to form more mechanistic and scientifically driven efforts in the field.
Wayne A. Marasco, MD, PhD, stated that by targeting 2 molecules instead of 1, higher levels of tumor cell killing can be achieved in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Leading experts in the breast cancer field highlight the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and other treatment modalities.
Related Content