Adjuvant Nivolumab Provides Sustained Benefit in Resected Esophageal/GEJ Cancer

Fact checked by Jordyn Sava
News
Article

Five-year follow-up confirms adjuvant nivolumab's sustained disease-free and distant metastasis-free survival benefits in resected esophageal/GEJ cancer post-CRT.

Five-year follow-up confirms adjuvant nivolumab's sustained disease-free and distant metastasis-free survival benefits in resected esophageal/GEJ cancer post-CRT.

Five-year follow-up confirms adjuvant nivolumab's sustained disease-free and distant metastasis-free survival benefits in resected esophageal/GEJ cancer post-CRT.

Adjuvant nivolumab (Opdivo) continued to demonstrate sustained benefits in both disease-free survival (DFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) after 5 years of follow-up in patients with resected esophageal cancer (EC) or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC) who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), according to long-term follow-up results from the phase 3 CheckMate 577 trial (NCT02743494).1 The primary overall survival (OS) analysis, though not statistically significant, showed prolonged OS and higher 5-year OS rates that suggested a clinically meaningful benefit when coupled with an adjusted benefit analysis accounting for subsequent therapies.

The study, presented by Ronan J. Kelly, MD, MBA, FASCO, at the2025 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meetingalso highlighted PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 1 as a potential biomarker for enriching benefit in this early-stage setting. These results further solidify adjuvant nivolumab as a standard of care for resected esophageal or GEJ cancer with residual pathologic disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

Findings from CheckMate 577 were initially presented at the2020 European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Virtual Congressand demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful DFS benefit with nivolumab compared with placebo, effectively doubling the median DFS from 11 months to 22.4 months (HR, 0.69).2,3

“Based on these results, nivolumab was globally approved for the adjuvant treatment of patients with resected esophageal or GEJ cancer and, to date, remains the only approved immunotherapy in this setting,”Kelly, medical oncologist at Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, said during the presentation.

Study Design and Key Findings

CheckMate 577 is a global, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. It enrolled 794 patients with stage II to III esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma who had undergone R0 resection and had residual pathologic disease. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive nivolumab for 1 year or placebo. The primary end point was DFS, with OS as a secondary end point.1

At a median follow-up of 78.3 months (range, 60.1–96.6), the DFS benefit was sustained, with median DFS doubling from 10.8 months in the placebo arm to 21.8 months with nivolumab (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63-0.91; P =.1064). DMFS also favored nivolumab, with the median DMFS increasing from 14.6 months to 27.3 months (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62-0.90).

Overall Survival and Subgroup Analysis

The final analysis of OS showed a clinically meaningful improvement with nivolumab, extending median OS by 16.4 months and resulting in higher 5-year OS rates compared with placebo, although statistical significance was not met in the primary analysis. OS rates at 3 and 5 years with nivolumab vs placebo were 57% vs 50% and 46% vs 41%, respectively. The OS curves began to separate around 18 months, with a 5%-7% improvement in OS rates between the 3- and 5-year marks.

Subgroup analysis revealed trends toward OS benefit with nivolumab across most subgroups. Notably, the improvement was more pronounced in EC (HR, 0.69) compared with GEJC (HR, 1.14). For the first time in this setting, PD-L1 CPS emerged as an important factor: patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1 showed an improvement in OS (HR, 0.79), while those with CPS < 1 derived little to no benefit (HR, 1.40).

Kelly cautioned that these subgroup analyses are exploratory due to small sample sizes.

Impact of Subsequent Therapy and Safety

An imbalance in subsequent anticancer therapy was observed, with 60% of patients in the placebo arm receiving it compared with 46% in the nivolumab arm, with a respective 5% and 15% going on to receive another line of immunotherapy. An ad hoc analysis adjusting for this confounding effect revealed an adjusted OS hazard ratio of 0.73, suggesting that the OS benefit was impacted by this imbalance.

In terms of safety, nivolumab was well tolerated, with most treatment-related adverse events being grade 1 or 2. No treatment-related deaths occurred.

References:

  1. Kelly RJ, Ajani JA, Kuzdzal J, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab in resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer (EC/GEJC) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT): First results of overall survival (OS) from CheckMate 577. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(suppl 16):4000. doi:10.1200/JCO.2025.43.16_suppl.4000
  2. Kelly RJ, Ajani JA, Kuzdzal J, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab in resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer (EC/GEJC): First results of the CheckMate 577 study. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(S1193-S1194):LBA9_PR. doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.2299
  3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration approves Opdivo® (nivolumab) as adjuvant treatment of completely resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer in patients who have received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. News release. Bristol Myers Squibb. May 20, 2021. Accessed May 31, 2025. https://bit.ly/2Sdail2

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Future findings from a translational analysis of the OVATION-2 trial may corroborate prior clinical data with IMNN-001 in advanced ovarian cancer.
The dual high-affinity binding observed with ISB 2001 may avoid resistance mechanisms reported with other BCMA-targeted therapies.
The use of chemotherapy trended towards improved recurrence-free intervals in older patients with high-risk tumors as determined via the MammaPrint assay.
Use of a pharmacist-directed resource appears to improve provider confidence and adverse effect monitoring for patients undergoing infusion therapy.
Reshma L. Mahtani, DO, describes how updates from the DESTINY-Breast09, ASCENT-04, and VERITAC-2 trials may shift practices in the breast cancer field.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting, from hot topics and emerging trends to travel recommendations.
Prior studies, like the phase 3 VISION trial, may support the notion of combining radiopharmaceuticals with best supportive care.
Beta emitters like 177Lu-rosopatamab may offer built-in PSMA imaging during the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Ongoing ctDNA analysis may elucidate outcomes associated with divarasib plus migoprotafib for those with KRAS G12C–positive NSCLC.
Related Content