Combination of TKI, Anti-PD1 Agent Active in Metastatic RCC

Article

More than half of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with a combination of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab responded to treatment at week 24, according to interim results of a phase I/II study presented at the 2017 ESMO Congress.

More than half of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with a combination of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor lenvatinib and the anti–PD-1 therapy pembrolizumab responded to treatment at week 24, according to interim results (abstract 8470) of a phase I/II study presented at the 2017 European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress in Madrid. Responses, all of which were partial responses, occurred both in patients with treatment-naive disease and those with previously treated disease.

The multicenter, open label study included 30 patients with metastatic clear cell RCC. Patients were given 20-mg lenvatinib per day plus 200-mg pembrolizumab every 3 weeks, the maximum tolerated dose established in the phase Ib study (n = 8). The primary endpoint was objective response rate at 24 weeks.

The majority of patients (63%) enrolled had at least one prior therapy. More than one-half of patients with prior treatment had prior VEGF-targeted therapy.

At 24 weeks, the objective response rate was 63% (95% CI, 44%–80%) based on investigator-assessed immune-related RECIST. The disease control rate, combining complete response, partial response, and stable disease, was 96%.

Much of the data for secondary endpoints was not yet mature. The median progression-free survival and median duration of response was not reached.

The researchers looked at outcomes based on prior treatment. The objective response rate was 83% for patients with previously untreated disease, with a disease control rate of 100%. In patients with previously treated disease, the objective response rate was 50% with a disease control rate of 94%. The median duration of response in previously treated disease was 8.5 months.

“The observed efficacy in the metastatic RCC cohort of Study 111, particularly the 83% response rate among treatment-naive patients, provides clinical evidence of the antitumor activity of lenvatinib in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with RCC,” lead investigator Chung-Han Lee, MD, PhD, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, said in a press release.

When evaluated by PD-L1 status, the objective response rate was 71% for patients with PD-L1–negative disease with a disease control rate of 100%. In PD-L1–positive disease, the objective response rate was lower, 58%, with a disease control rate of 91%.

The most common any-grade treatment-emergent adverse events were diarrhea, fatigue, hypothyroidism, nausea, and stomatitis. Sixteen patients had grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events and two had grade 4 events. In addition, two patients had grade 5 events but these were related to disease progression and not considered to be related to the study drugs.

“These data are encouraging as we look to continue enrollment in the CLEAR trial, a phase III trial evaluating the combination of this TKI and anti–PD-1 therapy in previously untreated patients with advanced RCC, and better understand how these results may translate to a larger group of patients with this type of cancer,” Lee said.

Recent Videos
A review of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma shows radiological tumor burden as an independent prognostic factor for survival.
A phase 2 trial is assessing ubamatamab in patients with MUC16-expressing SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma and epithelioid sarcoma.
Analysis of 2 phase 1 trials compared gut biome diversity between standard of care with or without CBM588 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
Ongoing research may clarify the potential benefit of avelumab when administered in combination with other agents in advanced urothelial carcinoma.
Spatial analyses may help determine factors that influence responses to sacituzumab govitecan-containing regimens in urothelial carcinoma.
Attending educational sessions may help with understanding how to manage toxicities associated with enfortumab vedotin in rare genitourinary cancers.
Related Content