Extended Follow-Up May Elucidate How ctDNA Impacts RMC-6236 PDAC Outcomes

Commentary
Video

Almost all patients evaluable for efficacy reported a decrease in ctDNA when treated with daraxonrasib for RAS-mutant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

CancerNetwork® spoke with Ignacio Garrido-Laguna, MD, PhD, MBA, professor of Oncology and co-leader of the GI Oncology Multidisciplinary Disease Group at the University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, about how circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) changes in patients who receive daraxonrasib (RMC-6236) may inform further clinical decision-making following a poster presentation of findings from a phase 1 trial (NCT05379985) he gave at the 2025 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancer Symposium.

Garrido-Laguna began by expressing that the study was a phase 1 trial, and that further research was needed to warrant a definitive answer as to how ctDNA changes may inform clinical decision-making. He further expressed that there were not sufficient data relating to whether patients with certain characteristics, such as those who had a molecular response, had a better response based on ctDNA positivity.

Additionally, he explained that almost all patients on study were reported to have a decrease in ctDNA, with approximately 50% experiencing complete ctDNA eradication. Additionally, many patients who experienced some molecular response reported decreasing ctDNA. Garrido-Laguna then expressed that future follow-up would help clarify how these findings may translate to improved outcomes for patients with stable disease.

Findings from the study revealed a benefit among patients classified as having KRAS G12X mutations vs those identified as having RAS mutations. For patients treated with 300 mg of daraxonrasib, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.8 months (95% CI, 8.5-not evaluable [NE]) vs 8.5 months (95% CI, 5.9-NE) in the respective groups. In those treated with 160 to 300 mg of daraxonrasib, it was 8.5 months (95% CI, 5.3-11.7) vs 7.6 months (95% CI, 5.9-11.1).

An overall survival (OS) benefit was also observed among those identified with KRAS G12X mutations vs RAS mutations. For those treated with 300 mg of daraxonrasib, median OS was NE (95% CI, NE-NE) vs NE (95% CI, 8.5-NE) with 6-month OS rates of 100% and 97% (95% CI, 79%-100%), respectively. In patients treated with 160 to 300 mg of daraxonrasib, the median OS was 14.5 months (95% CI, 8.8-NE) and 14.5 months (95% CI, 8.8-NE), with 6-month OS rates of 89% (95% CI, 70%-97%) and 91% (95% CI, 71%-96%), respectively.

Transcript:

It is too early [to answer] that. This is a phase 1 trial, and that means that we need [further research] to understand this better. For instance, something we have not done in the data that we have presented is trying to understand if patients who have stable disease have a [better] response based on ctDNA. Do patients with stable disease that do not have a molecular response or decrease in the ctDNA [have longer PFS]?

What we can tell from the data is nearly everyone had some decrease in ctDNA. Over 90% of patients had some molecular response, some decreasing in ctDNA. [Approximately] 50% of patients had complete eradication of ctDNA. That is interesting and promising. How that translates to improved outcomes for patients with a stable disease is something we will need to understand with future follow-up.

Reference

Garrido-Laguna I, Wolpin B, Park W, et al. Safety, efficacy, and on-treatment circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) changes from a phase 1 study of RMC-6236, a RAS(ON) multi-selective, tri-complex inhibitor, in patients with RAS mutant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(suppl 4):722. doi:10.1200/JCO.2025.43.4_suppl.722

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Those being treated for peritoneal carcinomatosis may not have to experience the complication rates or prolonged recovery associated with surgical options.
For patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, integrating PIPAC into a treatment regimen does not interrupt their systemic therapy.
According to Benjamin J. Golas, MD, PIPAC could be used as a bridging therapy before surgical debulking or between subsequent large surgical operations.
“If you have a [patient in the] fourth or fifth line, [JNJ-5322] could be a valid drug of choice,” said Rakesh Popat, BSc, MBBS, MRCP, FRCPath, PhD.
The trispecific antibody JNJ-5322 demonstrated superior efficacy vs approved agents in multiple myeloma in results shared at the 2025 EHA Congress.
“Dendritic cell vaccines, CAR T-cell therapy, and things of that nature are holding some promise,” said Andrew Brenner, MD, PhD.
Related Content