IMRT vs Proton Therapy in Esophageal Cancer

Video

This video reviews the advantages and disadvantages of IMRT and proton therapy for the treatment of esophageal cancer.

The current standard for treating patients with esophageal cancer is 3D radiation, but newer technologies such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and proton therapy have shown the ability to reduce toxicity by limiting radiation to the surrounding tissue.

In this video, Steven H. Lin, MD, PhD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, reviews IMRT and proton therapy, discussing some of the advantages and disadvantages.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Testing a patient’s genetics may influence decisions such as using longer courses of radiotherapy, says Rachit Kumar, MD.
Spatial transcriptomics and multiplex immunohistochemistry from samples may elucidate outcomes for patients who undergo surgical care for cancer.
Future work may focus on optimizing symptom management associated with percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy placement in malignant bowel obstructions.
Post-operative length of stay ranged from 4 to 9 days for patients who underwent percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy for malignant bowel obstructions.
Treatment with KRAS inhibitors may help mitigate a common driver of genetic alteration across a majority of pancreatic cancers.
Various methods of communication ensure that members from radiation oncology, pathology, and other departments are on the same page regarding treatment.
Updated results from the BREAKWATER study seemed to be most impactful to the CRC space, according to Michael J. Pishvaian, MD, PhD.
Related Content