Nivolumab Improves Response Rates for Metastatic NSCLC

Article

A phase III study (CheckMate 017) showed that nivolumab (Opdivo) was superior to docetaxel in patients previously treated for advanced or metastatic squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Image courtesy of Shutterstock

A phase III study (CheckMate 017) showed that nivolumab (Opdivo) was superior to docetaxel in patients previously treated for advanced or metastatic squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).1

This is an important study because lung cancer remains to be one of the deadliest of all cancers in the United States. This year, an estimated 221,200 adults (115,610 men and 105,590 women) in the will be diagnosed with lung cancer.1

Nivolumab showed greater overall survival in patients with metastatic squamous NSCLC, according to the phase III study. David R. Spigel, MD, presented his team's findings in a clinical science symposium (abstract 8009) at the 2015 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, held May 29-June 2, 2015 in Chicago. The findings can also be found in the May 2015 online issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology.2

The study included 272 patients who were randomly selected to receive nivolumab, a human IgG4 PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor antibody, or docetaxel until disease progression occurred, discontinuation due to toxicity, or for other reasons. The primary objective was overall survival (OS). Secondary objectives included investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1), progression-free survival (PFS), efficacy by PD-L1 expression (PD-L1 testing not required for enrollment), quality of life, and safety.

The researchers concluded that  the CheckMate 017 clinical trial met its primary objective, demonstrating superior overall survival of nivolumab versus docetaxel in patients with advanced, previously treated squamous cell NSCLC, and demonstrated PFS and overall a better response rate.

In summary, nivolumab represents a significant improvement in second-line therapy for patients with squamous cell NSCLC.

 

References:

Recent Videos
Advocacy groups such as Cancer Support Community and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society may help support patients with CML undergoing treatment.
Paolo Tarantino, MD, discusses the potential utility of agents such as datopotamab deruxtecan and enfortumab vedotin in patients with breast cancer.
Paolo Tarantino, MD, highlights strategies related to screening and multidisciplinary collaboration for managing ILD in patients who receive T-DXd.
Those with CML should discuss adverse effects such as nausea or fatigue with their providers to help optimize their quality of life during treatment.
Patients with CML can become an active part of their treatment plan by discussing any questions that come to mind with their providers.
Jorge E. Cortes, MD, emphasizes proper communication between patients with chronic myeloid leukemia and their providers during the treatment course.
Dietary interventions or other medications may help mitigate diarrhea in patients who undergo therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia.
Considering notable adverse effects associated with treatment may be critical when selecting therapy options for those with CML.
Byoung Chul Cho, MD, PhD, highlights ongoing trials assessing intravenous and subcutaneous amivantamab in EGFR-mutant non–small cell lung cancer.
An AI-based system may reduce the time needed to match patients with cancer to suitable clinical trials.
Related Content