Novel Therapy Yields Anti-Tumor Activity in KRAS G12C–Mutated CRC

News
Article

As a single agent or in combination, MK-1084 showed promising efficacy and safety results for patients with KRAS G12C–mutated CRC.

As a single agent or in combination, MK-1084 showed promising efficacy and safety results for patients with KRAS G12C–mutated CRC.

As a single agent or in combination, MK-1084 showed promising efficacy and safety results for patients with KRAS G12C–mutated CRC.

Whether as a single agent or in combination, MK-1084 showed promise regarding anti-tumor activity and safety for patients with KRAS G12C–mutated advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), according to results from the phase 1 KANDLELIT-001 (NCT05067283) presented at the 2025 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting.

At a median follow-up of 23.2 months (range, 0.2-37.7) the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) in patients receiving MK-1084 monotherapy was 38% (95% CI, 25%-52%) and the disease control rate was 83% (95% CI, 70%-92%). The time to response (TTR) was 1.5 months (range, 1.2-12.4) and the median duration of response (DOR) was 7.1 months (range, 2.5-21.3).

In patients receiving MK-1084 plus cetuximab (Erbitux), the confirmed ORR and DCR were 46% (95% CI, 30%-63%) and 92% (95%, 79%-98%), respectively, at a median follow-up of 9.2 months (range, 0.5-15.6). The median TTR and DOR were 1.5 months (range, 1.2-8.1) and 10.8 months (range, 2.7-11.1+), respectively. Among patients who received the triplet of MK-1084 plus cetuximab and chemotherapy, the confirmed ORR was 38% (95% CI, 21%-58%) and DCR was 93% (95% CI, 77%-99%) at a median follow-up of 4.6 months (range, 0.1-9.5). The median TTR and DOR were 1.4 months (range 1.2-4.4) and not reached (range, 1.3+ to 7.2+), respectively.

Safety data for the monotherapy arms included patients enrolled in KANDLELIT-001 with various solid tumors, not just CRC. In this population, there were 11 grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and 1 grade 4 TRAE. The corresponding numbers were 7 and 0, respectively, in the doublet arm, and 4 and 5 in the triplet arm. There were 3 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) overall: 1 DLT in the monotherapy arm (grade 3 electrocardiogram QT prolonged) and 2 DLTs in the triplet arm (grade 3 febrile neutropenia and grade 2 peripheral sensory neuropathy). There were no TRAE-related deaths in any of the arms. At the data cutoff date of March 12, 2025, 24% of the CRC patients in the monotherapy arms, 59% of patients in the doublet arm, and 97% of patients in the triplet arm remained on study treatment.

“Data support further evaluation of MK-1084-based combinations for the treatment of KRAS G12C–mutant colorectal cancer,” Iwona Lugowska, MD, PhD, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute and Oncology Centre, Warsaw, Poland, said when presenting the findings.

KANDLELIT-001 Background

Overall, the ongoing KANDLELIT-001 study has 6 arms, 4 of which included patients with CRC (the other 2 arms were all patients with lung cancer). Arms 1 and 3 were the MK-1084 monotherapy arms and included patients with various locally advanced unresectable or metastatic solid tumor types who had received at least 1 prior systemic treatment for advanced disease. Patient in arm 5 had locally advanced unresectable or metastatic CRC and 1 or 2 previous lines of systemic therapy in the advanced disease setting. The arm 5 group received MK-1084 plus cetuximab. Arm 6 also included patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic CRC; however, these patients had received 0 or 1 prior systemic lines for advanced disease. Patients in this cohort received MK-1084 plus cetuximab and chemotherapy.

Across the 2 monotherapy groups combined (arms 1+3), there were 58 patients with CRC. The median age of these patients was 58 (range, 27-81), 48% were female, 81% were White, and 17% were Asian. The ECOG performance status was 1 for 66% of patients and 0 for 34% of patients. Over 80% of patients received at least 2 prior lines of therapy with nearly 20% having received at least 4 lines.

There were 41 patients in the doublet group (arm 5) and 33 patients in the triplet group (arm 6), with the median age being 58 years in both arms. The 2 arms were 51% vs 52% female, 51% vs 30% Asian, and 49% vs 70% White, respectively. The ECOG performance status in the doublet arm was 1 for 49% and 0 for 51%, and two-thirds (66%) of patients had received 2 prior lines of therapy. In the triplet arm, the ECOG performances status was 1 for 36% and 0 for 64%. Forty-two percent of patients were treatment-naïve and 58% had received 1 prior line of systemic therapy.

Regarding dosing, patients in the monotherapy arms (arms 1+3) received oral MK-1084 once or twice daily for a total daily dose of 25 to 800 mg. In the doublet group (arm 5), patients were treated with oral MK-1084 once or twice daily for a total daily dose of 25 to 200 mg plus cetuximab IV per label. In arm 6, patients received oral MK-1084 once or twice daily for a total daily dose of 25 to 100 mg plus cetuximab IV per label and the mFOLFOX6 chemotherapy regimen (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil) per label.

The primary end points were DLTs, AEs, and AEs resulting in treatment discontinuation. The key secondary end points were investigator-reviewed ORR and DOR per RECIST v1.1.

Looking ahead, Lugowska said the open-label phase 3 KANDLELIT-012 trial is comparing MK-1084 plus cetuximab and mFOFOX6 against bevacizumab (Avastin) plus mFOLFOX6 in the first-line setting for patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic CRC.

Of note, data for the lung cancer arms of the KANDLELIT-001 study were presented in a separate abstract (8605) at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting.

Reference

Lugowska I, Simonelli M, Xue J, et al. The KRAS G12C inhibitor MK-1084 for KRAS G12C–mutated advanced colorectal cancer (CRC): Results from KANDLELIT-001. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(suppl 17):3508. doi:10.1200/JCO.2025.43.16_suppl.3508

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
The dual high-affinity binding observed with ISB 2001 may avoid resistance mechanisms reported with other BCMA-targeted therapies.
The use of chemotherapy trended towards improved recurrence-free intervals in older patients with high-risk tumors as determined via the MammaPrint assay.
Use of a pharmacist-directed resource appears to improve provider confidence and adverse effect monitoring for patients undergoing infusion therapy.
Reshma L. Mahtani, DO, describes how updates from the DESTINY-Breast09, ASCENT-04, and VERITAC-2 trials may shift practice in the breast cancer field.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting, from hot topics and emerging trends to travel recommendations.
Prior studies, like the phase 3 VISION trial, may support the notion of combining radiopharmaceuticals with best supportive care.
Beta emitters like 177Lu-rosopatamab may offer built-in PSMA imaging during the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Ongoing ctDNA analysis may elucidate outcomes associated with divarasib plus migoprotafib for those with KRAS G12C–positive NSCLC.
Clinical trials conducted in recent years demonstrate the benefit of integrative oncology for patients undergoing treatment for cancer.
Related Content