Petros Grivas, MD, PhD, on the Impact of First-Line Maintenance Avelumab in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

Video

Petros Grivas, MD, PhD, discusses the impact of avelumab on patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma in the first-line maintenance setting.

At the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, CancerNetwork® spoke with Petros Grivas, MD, PhD, of University of Washington School of Medicine, about the impact of avelumab (Bavencio) on patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma in the first-line maintenance setting.

Data from the phase 2 JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial (NCT02603432), which examined the agent in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic disease, reinforced that if patients were are treated with avelumab in the first-line maintenance setting, the time spent on the first- and second-line therapy was prolonged vs best supportive care.

Transcript:

The data from this particular abstract reinforced that if [patients] get avelumab as a maintenance therapy, the time that [they] spent in the first- and second-line therapy is prolonged compared [with] patients who [received] best supportive care. It was very difficult for us to granularly evaluate the progression-free survival in the subsequent line of therapy [following] progression in the maintenance trial. [However], with this abstract, we tried to estimate the overall time that [patients] spent in the first 2 lines of therapy after randomization. The data, if anything, substantiate or reinforce the benefit that avelumab has as a switch maintenance therapy in this population.

Reference

Grivas P, Park SH, Voog E, et al. Avelumab first-line (1L) maintenance plus best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC): analysis of time to end of next-line therapy in JAVELIN Bladder 100. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 15):4525. doi:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.4525

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
For patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers, the current standard of care for curative therapy has a cure rate of less than 50%.
According to Maurie Markman, MD, patient-reported outcomes pertain to more relevant questions surrounding the impact of therapy for patients.
Future findings from a translational analysis of the OVATION-2 trial may corroborate prior clinical data with IMNN-001 in advanced ovarian cancer.
The dual high-affinity binding observed with ISB 2001 may avoid resistance mechanisms reported with other BCMA-targeted therapies.
The use of chemotherapy trended towards improved recurrence-free intervals in older patients with high-risk tumors as determined via the MammaPrint assay.
Use of a pharmacist-directed resource appears to improve provider confidence and adverse effect monitoring for patients undergoing infusion therapy.
Reshma L. Mahtani, DO, describes how updates from the DESTINY-Breast09, ASCENT-04, and VERITAC-2 trials may shift practices in the breast cancer field.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting, from hot topics and emerging trends to travel recommendations.
Related Content