Opinion|Videos|December 23, 2024
Practical Adverse Management Strategies With Intravenous Amivantamab
Panelists discuss how venous thromboembolism risk assessment and prophylaxis decisions in patients with non–small cell lung cancer require careful consideration of individual risk factors, patient education strategies, and balanced communication about the benefits and concerns of preventive measures, particularly in the context of amivantamab therapy.
Advertisement
Video content above is prompted by the following:
- Shifting focus to cardiac adverse effects, specifically venous thromboembolism, or VTE, how do you approach risk assessment and prophylaxis in your practice?
- What factors do you consider when deciding on pharmacological vs nonpharmacological prophylaxis?
- What is your approach to VTE management with amivantamab?
- What strategies have you found effective in educating patients about early signs of VTE and the potential benefits of prophylaxis?
- In your experience, how do patients typically respond to discussions about VTE risk and potential prophylactic measures?
- In these conversations, how do you balance the potential benefits of prophylaxis with patient concerns about additional medications or injections?
Advertisement
Related to this article
Ralph V. Boccia, MD, FACP, discusses step-up dosing workflows, REMS, staff training, caregivers, and hospital partnerships for bispecifics.
Ralph V. Boccia, MD, FACP, discusses CAR T and bispecific sequencing, fixed-duration therapy, MRD, and bispecifics in AL amyloidosis.
“Those of us who work with NK cells have no doubt that they are incredibly powerful at killing cancer cells,” said Veronika Bachanova, MD, PhD.
Tyler Wilhite, MD, discusses expanding a radiation oncology program to also utilize low-dose radiation therapy for benign diseases.
Allen Khodab, MD discussed how patients with larger prostates had reduced IPSS scores that normalized to the same level as those with normal-sized glands.
Jeffrey V. Matous, MD, explains why ramantamig’s MRD negativity rates are clinically significant in relapsed/refractory myeloma.
In the phase 2 RALLY-MF study, selcodebart produced a 55% major response rate among evaluable non–transfusion-dependent patients with myelofibrosis.
Experts in multiple myeloma discussed long-term MAIA and CEPHEUS trial data and their implications for daratumumab-based regimens in newly diagnosed disease.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on CancerNetwork
1
Sequencing Bispecifics and CAR T-Cell Therapy in Myeloma and AL Amyloidosis
2
Novel Cancer Vaccine Plus Temozolomide Miss Primary End Point in Glioblastoma
3
Early Treatment Support and Real-World Care Gaps
4
FDA Approves Atezolizumab/Chemo for Stage III dMMR Colon Cancer
5