Multiple Myeloma

In patients with lens-refractory multiple myeloma, cilta-cel generated deeper minimal residual disease rates across all patient subgroups.

Pelabresib and ruxolitinib combination maintains consistent reduction of symptoms and anemia in patients with myelofibrosis.

Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma experienced sustained MRD negativity with isatuximab/bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone.

Findings from DREAMM-7 support belantamab mafodotin plus bortezomib and dexamethasone as a standard of care in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Samatha Shenoy, NP, MSN, highlighted lifestyle recommendations to help patients who are receiving talquetamab treatment for multiple myeloma.

All evaluable patients achieved minimal residual disease negativity following teclistamab-based treatment in the phase 3 MajesTEC-4/EMN30 trial.

PFS and OS were significantly improved with subcutaneous daratumumab vs active monitoring in patients with smoldering multiple myeloma.

Daratumumab plus VRd showed a deepened MRD and PFS rate for patients with transplant-ineligible or -deferred newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

A BLA has been accepted by the FDA for 2 belantamab mafodotin combinations that have shown positive results in patients with multiple myeloma.

Panelists discuss how they dose talquetamab in clinical practice, comparing its administration schedule to other bispecific antibodies and addressing dosing-related challenges they encounter.

Panelists discuss how they approach treatment strategies and challenges for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with CNS involvement, sharing case details and preferences among available therapeutic options.

Panelists discuss how addressing unmet needs and future directions for enhancing bispecific therapy care transitions in multiple myeloma requires focusing on standardized protocols, technology integration, personalized patient support, and continuous education for both patients and healthcare providers across academic and community settings.

Experts in multiple myeloma gathered to debate current treatment options in the space during a recent Face Off.

The use of CAR T-cell therapy and other sequencing options were discussed for patients with multiple myeloma.

Panelists discuss how to approach treatment decisions and management strategies for a 58-year-old woman with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who is post-autologous stem cell transplant, MRD-negative, and currently receiving bispecific antibody therapy, considering factors such as prior treatments, response duration, and long-term treatment goals.

Panelists discuss how optimizing dosing intervals and carefully considering combination strategies for bispecific antibodies in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma could enhance treatment efficacy while managing toxicities and improving patient quality of life.

Panelists discuss how recent clinical trials have demonstrated improved outcomes with antibody-containing regimens and biomarker-driven approaches in patients with transplant not-preferred newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM).

Experts in multiple myeloma discussed real-world efficacy and safety data associated with the use of GPRC5D-targeting bispecific agents to treat patients with R/R multiple myeloma.

Panelists discuss how to select appropriate bispecific antibody therapies for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who have failed BCMA-targeted treatments, considering factors such as alternative targets, mechanisms of resistance, and emerging clinical data to provide effective subsequent treatment options.

Panelists discuss how to optimize the sequencing of bispecific antibodies and CAR T-cell therapies in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, considering factors such as patient characteristics, disease burden, and the unique advantages of each approach to maximize treatment efficacy and patient outcomes.

Panelists discuss how unmet needs and future directions for GPRC5D bispecific therapy include improving accessibility, managing long-term safety, and exploring combination strategies to enhance treatment efficacy.

Panelists discuss how optimizing patient reintegration into community care after receiving bispecific therapy for multiple myeloma at academic centers requires a coordinated, patient-centered approach involving clear communication, standardized transition protocols, ongoing education, and collaborative care models between academic and community oncologists.

Panelists discuss how the evolution of GPRC5D-targeted therapies is expected to shape future treatment approaches for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in community practices by offering more personalized options and improving patient outcomes.

Panelists discuss how enhancing communication between academic and community oncologists during the referral and treatment process for multiple myeloma patients requires a multifaceted approach involving standardized protocols, technology integration, regular collaborative meetings, and shared decision-making to ensure seamless patient care and optimal outcomes.

Survival data from the interim analysis of the phase 3 DREAMM-7 trial will be presented at the 2024 ASH Annual Meeting.