40 Frequency of Documented IHC Score in Patients With HER2-Negative Breast Cancer in the US: An Observational Study Using Guardian Research Network Data

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 79

40 Frequency of Documented IHC Score in Patients With HER2-Negative Breast Cancer in the US: An Observational Study Using Guardian Research Network Data

40 Frequency of Documented IHC Score in Patients With HER2-Negative Breast Cancer in the US: An Observational Study Using Guardian Research Network Data

Background/Significance

For patients with breast cancer, HER2 expression based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) and In Situ Hybridization (ISH) test scores has been interpreted as negative (IHC0, IHC1+, and IHC2+/ISH-) or positive (IHC2+/ISH+ and IHC3+). Data from the DESTINY-Breast04 and DESTINY-Breast06 trials indicate clinical relevance in identifying patients with low (IHC1+ and IHC2+/ISH-) and ultralow (IHC0 with membrane staining) HER2 expression because they could benefit from HER2-directed therapy. The objective of this study was to investigate how frequently HER2 IHC expression is documented in patient medical records and to quantify the proportion of patients with HER2-negative breast cancer who exhibit low and ultralow levels of HER2 expression.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective cohort study utilized electronic medical record data from the Guardian Research Network, which includes data from 7 community health care organizations throughout the US. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were aged 18 years or older, diagnosed with breast cancer (ICD10 code C50), which was classified as HER2-negative, and had 1 or more clinical evaluation related to their cancer from January 1, 2018, to November 15, 2023. A natural language processing algorithm was applied to structured and unstructured medical record fields to identify HER2-negative patients and documentation of their IHC discrete scores. Patients were classified into subgroups based on the highest IHC score documented during the study period and their breast cancer stage at the time of this score.

Results

The analytic cohort comprised 13,100 patients whose breast cancer was classified as HER2-negative; 10,746 (82.0%) had early-stage breast cancer, 355 (2.7%) locally advanced, and 1,999 (15.3%) metastatic. Most patients (11,174, 85.3%) had documented IHC scores, of which 37.0% were IHC0, 41.3% IHC1+, 20.5% IHC2+, and 1.3% IHC3+. Only one of the 7 health care organizations with patients in the analytic cohort documented the percentage of HER2 IHC staining. Of 514 HER2-negative patients with IHC0 at this center, 51 (9.9%) had 0% staining, 140 (27.2%) had membrane staining (>0% ≤10%), and 323 (62.8%) did not have documented percentage staining.

Conclusion

Results from this study indicate that, despite clinical recommendations at the time of the study, 1 in 6 HER2-negative patients do not have a documented discrete IHC score, and very few have granular information on the observed percentage of HER2 expression.

Articles in this issue

40 Frequency of Documented IHC Score in Patients With HER2-Negative Breast Cancer in the US: An Observational Study Using Guardian Research Network Data
40 Frequency of Documented IHC Score in Patients With HER2-Negative Breast Cancer in the US: An Observational Study Using Guardian Research Network Data
41 Provider Preferences and Practices in Testing and Reporting HER2 Immunohistochemistry in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Survey and Interview Study Among US Pathologists and Oncologists
41 Provider Preferences and Practices in Testing and Reporting HER2 Immunohistochemistry in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Survey and Interview Study Among US Pathologists and Oncologists
42 Exploring the Treatment Gap in High-Risk HR+, HER2– Early Breast Cancer: Eligible Patients Not Receiving Abemaciclib in the US
42 Exploring the Treatment Gap in High-Risk HR+, HER2– Early Breast Cancer: Eligible Patients Not Receiving Abemaciclib in the US
TPS 43 ADELA: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Elacestrant + Everolimus vs Elacestrant + Placebo in ER+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With ESR1-Mutated Tumors Progressing on Endocrine Therapy
TPS 43 ADELA: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Elacestrant + Everolimus vs Elacestrant + Placebo in ER+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With ESR1-Mutated Tumors Progressing on Endocrine Therapy
45 A Phase 3 Randomized Study of Adjuvant Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Plus Pembrolizumab vs Treatment of Physician’s Choice in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Did Not Achieve a Pathological Complete Response at Surgery
45 A Phase 3 Randomized Study of Adjuvant Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Plus Pembrolizumab vs Treatment of Physician’s Choice in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Did Not Achieve a Pathological Complete Response at Surgery
46 Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo for High-Risk, Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Overall Survival and Subgroup Results From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 Study
46 Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo for High-Risk, Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Overall Survival and Subgroup Results From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 Study
48 Prevalence of “HER2 Ultra-Low” Among Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With Historical IHC0 Status
48 Prevalence of “HER2 Ultra-Low” Among Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With Historical IHC0 Status
49 Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR+/HER2–, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval
49 Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR+/HER2–, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval
52 Correlation and Prediction of Complete Pathologic Response Rates and Ki-67 in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
52 Correlation and Prediction of Complete Pathologic Response Rates and Ki-67 in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
53 Comparison of Surgical Complications With Direct-to-Implant vs Tissue Expander Reconstruction After Wise Pattern Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
53 Comparison of Surgical Complications With Direct-to-Implant vs Tissue Expander Reconstruction After Wise Pattern Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
54 The Treatment of Breast Cancer With Percutaneous Thermal Ablation: Results of the THERMAC Trial
54 The Treatment of Breast Cancer With Percutaneous Thermal Ablation: Results of the THERMAC Trial
55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?
56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?
57 Tumor Morphology Concordance in Multifocal/Multicentric Triple- Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancers
57 Tumor Morphology Concordance in Multifocal/Multicentric Triple- Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancers
59 Are Choosing Wisely Guidelines Applicable to Patients With a High Ki-67 Proliferation Index and Magee Equation Score?
59 Are Choosing Wisely Guidelines Applicable to Patients With a High Ki-67 Proliferation Index and Magee Equation Score?

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Use of a pharmacist-directed resource appears to improve provider confidence and adverse effect monitoring for patients undergoing infusion therapy.
Reshma L. Mahtani, DO, describes how updates from the DESTINY-Breast09, ASCENT-04, and VERITAC-2 trials may shift practice in the breast cancer field.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting, from hot topics and emerging trends to travel recommendations.
Prior studies, like the phase 3 VISION trial, may support the notion of combining radiopharmaceuticals with best supportive care.
Beta emitters like 177Lu-rosopatamab may offer built-in PSMA imaging during the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Ongoing ctDNA analysis may elucidate outcomes associated with divarasib plus migoprotafib for those with KRAS G12C–positive NSCLC.
Clinical trials conducted in recent years demonstrate the benefit of integrative oncology for patients undergoing treatment for cancer.
Related Content