ASCO Urges Passage of Patient’s Bill of Rights

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 9 No 5
Volume 9
Issue 5

WASHINGTON-All cancer patients should have the opportunity to participate in clinical trials, something that will occur only if Congress passes pending legislation to guarantee insurance coverage for the cost of routine patient care for study participants, speakers told a Capitol Hill briefing sponsored by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO).

WASHINGTON—All cancer patients should have the opportunity to participate in clinical trials, something that will occur only if Congress passes pending legislation to guarantee insurance coverage for the cost of routine patient care for study participants, speakers told a Capitol Hill briefing sponsored by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO).

Such coverage is included in the Patient’s Bill of Rights bills currently being considered by a House–Senate conference committee.

Access to Trials

“Far too few patients in this country have access to cancer clinical trials, which can offer patients their best and last hope of effective therapy,” said Lowell Schnipper, MD, of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston.

Frank Haluska, MD, PhD, of Massachusetts General Hospital, told the gathering, “Our responsibility is to support legislation that allows patients to take part in clinical trials despite their means.”

Currently, only about 3% of adult cancer patients participate in clinical trials. One reason is that often health insurance plans refuse—if the patient is part of a research study—to pay for patient care costs they would normally cover.

Both Houses passed legislation last year and a conference committee is trying to resolve differences in the two bills. Many in oncology would like to see a requirement that coverage include both NCI-sponsored trials and FDA-approved trials sponsored by pharmaceutical companies.

“If clinical trials are not supported, we destroy not only today’s medical care but the future of research and effective drug therapies,” said Christina Carr, representing the Ovarian Cancer National Alliance. “We will muzzle research and discourage researcher’s in frontline medical discoveries.”

Not Acceptable

Added Ellen Stovall, executive director of the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship: “Any legislation that falls short of including clinical trials sponsored by qualified nongovernmental agencies and industry will not be acceptable.”

Ms. Stovall stressed that “the collaboration of industry, academia, and government can result in the most efficient clinical trials system that identifies safe and effective treatments at the earliest possible time, to ensure that those therapies are appropriately covered by third-party payers and that unsafe and ineffective therapies are not utilized.”

Related Videos
Interim data reveal favorable responses in patients with low-grade serous ovarian cancer treated with avutometinib plus defactinib, according to Susana N. Banerjee, MD.
Treatment with mirvetuximab soravtansine appears to produce a 3-fold improvement in objective response rate vs chemotherapy among patients with folate receptor-α–expressing, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer in the phase 3 MIRASOL trial.
PRGN-3005 autologous UltraCAR-T cells appear well-tolerated and decreases tumor burden in a population of patients with advanced platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.
An expert from Dana-Farber Cancer Institute discusses findings from the final overall survival analysis of the phase 3 ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial.