Cardiovascular Risk Associated With Androgen Deprivation Therapy

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 24 No 9
Volume 24
Issue 9

Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death among men in the United States.[1] Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a common treatment for prostate cancer. ADT includes gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists (leuprolide, goserelin, triptorelin), bilateral orchiectomy, and anti-androgen receptor blockers such as flutamide and bicalutamide. Several studies have now shown conflicting evidence that anti-androgen therapy may lead to increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.[2-5] None of these studies has provided conclusive evidence for causality or a direct link to cardiovascular disease, but they have proposed that therapy side-effects increase parameters that are similar to those of the metabolic syndrome.

Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death among men in the United States.[1] Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a common treatment for prostate cancer. ADT includes gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists (leuprolide, goserelin, triptorelin), bilateral orchiectomy, and anti-androgen receptor blockers such as flutamide and bicalutamide. Several studies have now shown conflicting evidence that anti-androgen therapy may lead to increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.[2-5] None of these studies has provided conclusive evidence for causality or a direct link to cardiovascular disease, but they have proposed that therapy side-effects increase parameters that are similar to those of the metabolic syndrome.

Metabolic Effects of ADT

Anti-androgen therapy is associated with several complications, including loss of libido, hot flashes, night sweats, psychological stress, osteoporosis, anemia, fatigue, loss of muscle mass, glucose intolerance, and changes in lipid profile.[6,7] This includes an increase in truncal subcutaneous and muscle adipose deposits, with a decrease in lean body mass but not visceral fat.[8-10] Central obesity is associated with increased cortisol levels, increased plasma-free fatty acids, and insulin resistance. This side-effect is an early adverse effect and is apparent within the first few months of therapy.[11,12] It is accompanied by an increase in serum cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL), and triglycerides.[13,14] These changes in fat deposition, insulin resistance, and lipid profiles are similar, but not identical, to the metabolic dysfunction that contributes to cardiovascular implications.[15] There are clear differences in the hormonal effects of ADT that may counteract or balance their negative impact, such as the increase in HDL and increase in subcutaneous fat rather than visceral fat. Also, inflammatory markers such as CRP, which is elevated in cardiovascular disease, are not elevated in ADT.[11,16] Thus, the side effects of ADT are likely a unique combination with an unclear impact.

Besides the unique metabolic dysfunction caused by ADT, it is also unclear whether the changes in metabolic effects are causative or if other, yet-unknown mechanisms are involved. Some of these side effects may also be class-specific or associated with specific medications, rather than all being the result of ADT. In the observational study by Keating et al, treatment with GnRH agonists, compared with no ADT therapy, was associated with increased risk of diabetes, coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, sudden cardiac death, and stroke. Combined androgen blockade was associated with an increased risk of coronary artery disease. Orchiectomy was associated with coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction. However, oral anti-androgen monotherapy was not associated with any such outcome.[17]

Balancing ADT Benefits Against Long-term Side Effects

Eventually, patients who are on ADT attain an incurable androgen-independent state leading to potentially more-severe side effects. Clinicians have to balance the potential therapeutic benefits of androgen deprivation against the long-term side effects, especially the changes in metabolic profile that this therapy will precipitate. As detection techniques improve, with prostate cancer being diagnosed earlier, the number of patients treated and the length of treatment with ADT will likely increase, making the initiation of ADT even more controversial. Currently it is accepted that patients with metastatic disease receive benefit from ADT, but guidelines are not established for men with isolated disease and for whom benefit is yet to be proven.[18,19] Practitioners will have to be increasingly mindful of side effects as increasing numbers of patients are started on ADT at an earlier date, especially those with established cardiovascular disease and specific high-risk subgroups of patients. In an analysis of the data from the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Endeavour (CaPSURE) registry,[5] ADT may increase the risk of cardiovascular death in patients over 65 years of age, and this effect may be related to the length of treatment with ADT. Further detailed research on types of anti-androgen therapies needs to be explored in the future, to assess the risk of heart disease and the extent that these therapies decrease the cardioprotective effects of testosterone. It should also be noted that an equal number of studies can be identified that show no relationship between ADT and cardiovascular risk.[20-22] For example, a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) randomized trial compared radiotherapy with 6 months of ADT therapy vs radiotherapy with 3 years of ADT in locally advanced prostate cancer, and found no significant difference in the rate of fatal cardiac events at 5-year follow-up.[18]

A recent scientific advisory committee including the American Heart Association, American Cancer Society, and American Urological Association was established as a result of multiple recent studies showing an increase in myocardial infarctions and cardiovascular death among men receiving ADT. This committee agrees that currently there is no evidence that patients for whom ADT is recommended should have cardiac testing prior to initiating therapy or need clearance for therapy from a cardiologist or internist. The decision to start ADT should likely remain between the patient and his oncologist. Patients should be followed closely for the changes in metabolism that may be managed by their internists, however. These patients, especially men with baseline cardiac disease, should likely have aggressive management with lipid-lowering therapy, antihypertensive medications, glucose-lowering therapy, and antiplatelet therapy when appropriate. Healthy lifestyle changes, including smoking cessation, targeting obesity reduction, and increasing exercise, should be advised in these patients.[23]

Financial Disclosure:The authors have no significant financial interest or other relationship with the manufacturers of any products or providers of any service mentioned in this article.

References:

References

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al: Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 59:225-249, 2009.
2. Keating NL, O’Malley AJ, Smith MR: Diabetes and cardiovascular disease during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:4448-4456, 2006.
3. Saigal CS, Gore JL, Krupski TL, et al: Androgen deprivation therapy increases cardiovascular morbidity in men with prostate cancer. Cancer 110:1493-1500, 2007.
4. D’Amico AV, Denham JW, Crook J, et al: Influence of androgen suppression therapy for prostate cancer on the frequency and timing of fatal myocardial infarctions. J Clin Oncol 25:2420-2425, 2007.
5. Tsai HK, D’Amico AV, Sadetsky N, et al: Androgen deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer and the risk of cardiovascular mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:1516-1524, 2007.
6. Rashid MH, Chaudhary UB: Intermittent androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. Oncologist 9:295-301, 2004.
7. Strum SB, McDermed JE, Scholz MC, et al: Anaemia associated with androgen deprivation in patients with prostate cancer receiving combined hormone blockade. Br J Urol 79:933-941, 1997.
8. Tsai EC, Boyko EJ, Leonetti DL, et al: Low serum testosterone level as a predictor of increased visceral fat in Japanese-American men. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24:485-491, 2000.
9. Vermeulen A, Goemaere S, Kaufman JM: Testosterone, body composition and aging. J Endocrinol Invest 22:110-116, 2000.
10. Smith MR: Changes in fat and lean body mass during androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. Urology 63:742-745, 2004.
11. Smith MR, Lee H, McGovern F, et al: Metabolic changes during gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy for prostate cancer: Differences from the classic metabolic syndrome. Cancer 112:2188-2194, 2008.
12. Lee H, McGovern K, Finkelstein JS, et al: Changes in bone mineral density and body composition during initial and long-term gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment for prostate carcinoma. Cancer 104:1633-1637, 2005.
13. Smith MR, Finkelstein JS, McGovern FJ, et al: Changes in body composition during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:599-603, 2002.
14. Eri LM, Urdal P, Bechensteen AG: Effects of the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist leuprolide on lipoproteins, fibrinogen and plasminogen activator inhibitor in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 154:100-104, 1995.
15. Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ: The metabolic syndrome. Lancet 365:1415-1428, 2005.
16. Smith MR, Lee H, Fallon MA, et al: Adipocytokines, obesity, and insulin resistance during combined androgen blockade for prostate cancer. Urology 71:318-322, 2008.
17. Keating NL, O’Malley AJ, Freedland SJ, et al: Diabetes and cardiovascular disease during androgen deprivation therapy: Observational study of veterans with prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 102:39-46, 2010.
18. Bolla M, de Reijke TM, Van Tienhoven G, et al: Duration of androgen suppression in the treatment of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 360:2516-2527, 2009.
19. Perlmutter MA, Lepor H: Androgen deprivation therapy in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Rev Urol 9(suppl 1):S3-S8, 2007.
20. Roach M, 3rd, Bae K, Speight J, et al: Short-term neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy and external-beam radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: Long-term results of RTOG 8610. J Clin Oncol 26:585-591, 2008.
21. Efstathiou JA, Bae K, Shipley WU, et al: Cardiovascular mortality after androgen deprivation therapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: RTOG 85-31. J Clin Oncol 27:92-99, 2009.
22. Studer UE, Whelan P, Albrecht W, et al: Immediate or deferred androgen deprivation for patients with prostate cancer not suitable for local treatment with curative intent: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Trial 30891. J Clin Oncol 24:1868-1876, 2006.
23. Levine GN, D’Amico AV, Berger P, et al: Androgen-deprivation therapy in prostate cancer and cardiovascular risk: A science advisory from the American Heart Association, American Cancer Society, and American Urological Association: Endorsed by the American Society for Radiation Oncology. Circulation 121:833-840, 2010.

Related Videos
Two women in genitourinary oncology discuss their experiences with figuring out when to begin a family and how to prioritize both work and children.
Over the past few decades, the prostate cancer space has evolved with increased funding for clinical trial creation and enrollment.
Rohit Gosain, MD; Rahul Gosain, MD; and Rana R. McKay, MD, presenting slides
Rohit Gosain, MD; Rahul Gosain, MD; and Rana R. McKay, MD, presenting slides
Rohit Gosain, MD; Rahul Gosain, MD; and Rana R. McKay, MD, presenting slides
Rohit Gosain, MD; Rahul Gosain, MD; and Rana R. McKay, MD, presenting slides
Anemia in patients who receive talazoparib plus enzalutamide for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer appears to be manageable without any compromises in patient-reported outcomes and quality of life.
Artificial intelligence models may be “seamlessly incorporated” into clinical workflow in the management of prostate cancer, says Eric Li, MD.
Robust genetic testing guidelines in the prostate cancer space must be supported by strong clinical research before they can be properly implemented, says William J. Catalona, MD.
Related Content