OR WAIT null SECS
In their paper, Schwartz and colleagues review the risk factors for depression and suicide in patients with cancer and argue convincingly that screening for depression can be simply and quickly performed. They also delineate the efficacy and potential adverse effects of psychotherapeutic or psychopharmacologic treatments for these patients. Buttressing the identification and treatment of depression in the cancer patient are vital, ongoing scientific developments that flow from an increased understanding of interactions among the brain, endocrine system, and immune system. This rapidly evolving body of neurobiological knowledge has catalyzed fundamental changes in how we conceptualize depression in cancer patients and has important ramifications regarding the treatment and prevention of depressive syndromes in this setting.
In their paper, Schwartz and colleagues review the risk factors fordepression and suicide in patients with cancer and argue convincingly thatscreening for depression can be simply and quickly performed. They alsodelineate the efficacy and potential adverse effects of psychotherapeutic orpsychopharmacologic treatments for these patients. Buttressing theidentification and treatment of depression in the cancer patient are vital,ongoing scientific developments that flow from an increased understanding ofinteractions among the brain, endocrine system, and immune system. This rapidlyevolving body of neurobiological knowledge has catalyzed fundamental changes inhow we conceptualize depression in cancer patients and has importantramifications regarding the treatment and prevention of depressive syndromes inthis setting.
HPA Axis Hyperactivity
Indeed, recent advances in biological psychiatry have included discoveries ofneurochemical, neuroendocrine, and neuroanatomic alterations in patients withmajor depression. Such findings include hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axishyperactivity, alterations of the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis,diminished serotonergic neurotransmission, structural and functional brainabnormalities, impaired sleep architecture, and activation of the immunesystem.
Although few of these biological alterations have been systematicallyinvestigated in medically ill patients, certain effects have been observed incancer patients with comorbid depressionnotably hyperactivity of thehypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis,[2-4] as manifested by nonsuppressionof plasma cortisol concentrations following dexamethasone administration, andincreased immune activity, as manifested by elevated levels of proinflammatorycytokines .
HPA axis hyperactivity in patients with cancer and comorbid depression islikely due, at least in part, to central nervous system (CNS) hypersecretion ofcorticotropin-releasing factor (CRF). The preeminent CNS stress hormone, CRF islocated in neurons both inside and outside the hypothalamus. Within thehypothalamus, CRF-containing neurons that project from the paraventricularnucleus to the median eminence control the secretion of adrenocorticotropichormone (ACTH) and beta-endorphin from the anterior pituitary; ACTH, in turn,stimulates cortisol secretion from the adrenal cortex. In addition to itsneuroendocrine role in extrahypothalamic circuits throughout the nervous system,CRF also coordinates behavioral, autonomic, and immune responses to stress.
Whether HPA axis hyperactivity (and other neurochemical/neuroendocrineperturbations) influences immune function, cancer progression, and survival iscurrently a matter of intense scrutiny and debate. Spiegel and colleagues haverecently documented that women with metastatic breast cancer who exhibit areduced diurnal variability in cortisol secretion have not only diminishednatural killer cell function, but also increased mortality over a 6-yearfollow-up period.
Patients with cancer may also be susceptible to depressive syndromes broughton by inflammation secondary to tissue damage (eg, following surgery, or duringchemotherapy and/or radiation treatment) and the associated release ofproinflammatory cytokines. These cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6,and tumor necrosis factor (TNF), are produced by activated immune cells thatregulate immune responses involved in host defense[8,9] and have profoundneuroendocrine and behavioral consequences. For example, they have the capacityto directly stimulate the HPA axis, resulting in the release of CRF.[10-12]
Moreover, with regard to mood disorders, proinflammatory cytokines can alsoinduce "sickness behavior," a syndrome whose symptomsincludingfatigue, anorexia, anhedonia, decreased psychomotor activity, and thedisappearance of body care activitiesoverlap with those of majordepression.[13,14] In one study, plasma concentrations of IL-6 were markedlyelevated in cancer patients with depression, compared to cancer patients withoutdepression and healthy controls. Whether through the release ofproinflammatory cytokines or via stress-induced CRF hypersecretion, HPAhyperactivity in patients with cancer and depression may exert untoward effectson immunologic function.
Prophylactic Antidepressant Administration
Given the elevations of IL-6 plasma concentrations in patients with cancerand major depression, and noting Yirmiya’s 1996 report of the reduction ofsickness behavior in animals treated with antidepressants prior to immune systemactivation, we conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlledtrial in patients with malignant melanoma receiving high doses of the cytokineinterferon alfa-2b (Intron A). We sought to determine whether administrationof the selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor paroxetine (Paxil) wouldeffectively diminish the induction of depressive symptoms in this population.
Among malignant melanoma patients receiving placebo, 45% developed symptomssufficient to meet DSM-IV criteria for major depression. However, in the groupof patients who received paroxetine, beginning 2 weeks prior to the initiationof interferon alfa-2b administration (and throughout the first 3 months ofinterferon alfa-2b therapy), the development of major depression wassignificantly reduced (fourfold, to 11%). In comparison to placebo-treatedpatients, the paroxetine-treated patients experienced significantly reducedelevations of depression, anxiety, and neurotoxicity symptoms. In addition,paroxetine treatment significantly decreased the likelihood that interferonalfa-2b would have to be discontinued due to severe depression or neurotoxicity(Figure 1).
In certain instances, prophylactic antidepressant treatment of cancerpatients may not only reduce the incidence of depressive symptoms, but alsoprevent other symptoms associated with immune system activation such ascognitive dysfunction and pain, and thus improve compliance with immunotherapyand long-term survival.
Certainly, this century will bring further evolution of concepts regardingthe diagnosis, pathophysiology, and treatment/prevention of depression in thepatient with cancer. For example, investigators will undoubtedly seek todetermine whether psychiatric interventions that reduce HPA axis hyperactivityand normalize immune function will enhance long-term survival through increasedcompliance or via other, as yet undiscovered, neurobiological pathways.
1. Musselman DL, DeBattista C, Nathan K, et al: Biology of mood disorders, inAmerican Psychiatric Press Textbook of Psychopharmacology, 2nd ed, pp 550-588.Schatzberg AF, Nemeroff CB (eds): Washington, DC, APA Press, 1998.
2. Joffe RT, Rubinow DR, Denicoff KD, et al: Depression and carcinoma of thepancreas. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 8:241-245, 1986.
3. Evans DL, McCartney CF, Nemeroff CB, et al: Depression in women treatedfor gynecological cancer: Clinical and neuroendocrine assessment. Am JPsychiatry 143:447-452, 1986.
4. Musselman DL, Miller AH, Porter MR, et al: Increased plasma interleukin-6concentrations in cancer patients with depression. Am J Psychiatry. In press.
5. Swanson LW, Sawchenko PE, Rivier J, et al: Organization of ovinecorticotropin-releasing factor immunoreactive cells and fibers in the rat brain:An immunohistochemical study. Neuroendocrinology 36:165-186, 1983.
6. Vale W, Spiess J, Rivier C, et al: Characterization of a 41-residue ovinehypothalamic peptide that stimulates secretion of corticotropin andbeta-endorphin. Science 213:1394-1397, 1981.
7. Sephton SE, Sepulsky RM, Kraemer HC, et al: Diurnal cortisol rhythm as apredictor of breast cancer survival. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:994-1000, 2000.
8. Gabay C, Kushner I: Acute-phase proteins and other systemic responses toinflammation. N Engl J Med 340:448-454, 1999.
9. Hirano T, Shizuo A, Taga T, et al: Biological and clinical aspects ofinterleukin-6. Immunology Today 11:443-449, 1990.
10. Reichlin S: Neuroendocrine-immune interactions. N Engl J Med329:1246-1253, 1993.
11. Blalock JE: A molecular basis for bidirectional communication between theimmune and neuroendocrine systems. Physiology Reviews 69:1-32, 1989.
12. Besedovsky HO, del Rey A: Immune-neuro-endocrine interactions: Facts andhypotheses. Endocrine Reviews 17:64-102, 1996.
13. Kent S et al: Sickness behavior as a new target for drug development.Trends in Pharmacological Science 13:24-28, 1992.
14. Yirmiya R: Endotoxin produces a depressive-like episode in rats. BrainRes 711:163-174, 1996.
15. Musselman DL, Lawson DH, Gumnick JF, et al: Paroxetine for the preventionof depression induced by high-dose interferon alfa. N Engl J Med 344:961-966,2001.