Data Published for First-Line Irinotecan

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 9 No 11
Volume 9
Issue 11

NEW YORK-Response and overall survival were significantly improved with use of irinotecan (Camptosar), fluorouracil, and leucovorin, compared with fluorouracil/leucovorin alone, in a randomized study involving 683 patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

NEW YORK—Response and overall survival were significantly improved with use of irinotecan (Camptosar), fluorouracil, and leucovorin, compared with fluorouracil/leucovorin alone, in a randomized study involving 683 patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

Leonard B. Saltz, MD, of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, reported the results for the Irinotecan Study Group at the 36th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, and the full data have now been published (N Engl J Med 343:905-914, 2000).

Patients received bolus fluorouracil 500 mg/m² plus leucovorin 20 mg/m² plus irinotecan 125 mg/m² weekly for 4 weeks or the Mayo Clinic bolus fluorouracil/leucovorin regimen.

Dr. Saltz reported a confirmed response rate of 39% for patients receiving irinotecan therapy vs 21% for those assigned to fluorouracil/leucovorin (P < .001). Median progression-free survival was 7 months for those on irinotecan vs 4.3 months for those on fluorouracil/leucovorin alone (P = .004). Median overall survival was 14.8 months for the irinotecan group vs 12.6 months for fluorouracil/leucovorin (P = .04). Analysis of quality-of-life data showed no significant differences between the groups.

The irinotecan combination is now being compared with a weekly regimen of fluorouracil/leucovorin as adjuvant therapy for patients with stage III colon cancer “to determine whether it will increase rates of cure in patients with an earlier stage of the disease,” Dr. Saltz said.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Specialties including neurosurgery, radiation oncology, and neuro-rehabilitation all play a notable role in the care of patients with brain tumors.
Treatment-related toxicities during neuro-oncology therapy appear well managed with dose modifications and treatment cycle holds.
The phase 3 NIVOSTOP trial evaluated an anti–PD-1 immunotherapy, nivolumab, in a patient population similar in the KEYNOTE-689 trial.
CAR T-cell therapies appear to be an evolving modality in the treatment of those with intracranial tumors, said Sylvia Kurz, MD, PhD.
Opportunities to further reduce relapses include pembrolizumab-based combination therapy and evaluating the agent’s contribution before and after surgery.
For patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers, the current standard of care for curative therapy has a cure rate of less than 50%.
According to Maurie Markman, MD, patient-reported outcomes pertain to more relevant questions surrounding the impact of therapy for patients.
CancerNetwork® spoke with Neha Mehta-Shah, MD, MSCI, about the clinical landscape for patients undergoing treatment for rare lymphomas.
Related Content