Gliomas react to radiation plus chemotherapy

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 18 No 2
Volume 18
Issue 2

Adult patients with low-grade glioma had better survival if they received chemotherapy in addition to radiotherapy, according to the results of a Radiation Th erapy Oncology Group (RTOG) study. The data were presented at the 2008 Society for Neuro-Oncology meeting in Lake Las Vegas, Nev.

Adult patients with low-grade glioma had better survival if they received chemotherapy in addition to radiotherapy, according to the results of a Radiation Th erapy Oncology Group (RTOG) study. The data were presented at the 2008 Society for Neuro-Oncology meeting in Lake Las Vegas, Nev.

The RTOG 9802 investigators randomized 251 patients with high-risk, low-grade gliomas to receive either six weeks of radiotherapy alone or six weeks of radiotherapy followed by six cycles of chemotherapy (procarbazine, CCNU, and vincristine). For patients who survived at least one year post-treatment, the *risk of death was reduced by 43% while progression-free survival was reduced by 64%. With a median follow-up of 5.9 years, the five-year overall survival rate was 72% for the patients who received the dual therapy, compared with 63% for those who received radiotherapy alone. Five-year progression-free survival rates was 63% for the dual therapy group and 46% for those who received radiation therapy alone.

“In this RTOG study we found that patients who survived at least one year from the completion of their treatment had much better survival and progression-free survival rates if they received chemotherapy in combination with radiotherapy,” said lead investigator Edward G. Shaw, MD, of the Wake Forest University School of Medicine in Winston-Salem, N.C. “Th is is the first multicenter prospective clinical trial to suggest a benefit from adjuvant therapy in this patient population.”

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Treatment with lorlatinib might be effective regardless of the presence of central nervous system metastases, according to Misako Nagasaka, MD, PhD.
Most central nervous system events with lorlatinib were grade 1 or 2 in the phase 3 CROWN trial.
Treatment with lorlatinib did not increase cardiovascular events among patients with ALK-positive non–small cell lung cancer in the CROWN trial.
Having all the necessary staff together, from medical oncologists to pharmacists, helps deliver the best possible outcomes to patients with cancer.
At 5 years, 60% of patients who received lorlatinib in the phase 3 CROWN study achieved progression-free survival.
Joseph C. Landolfi, DO, CPE, and Michelle Morrison, MPH, BSHA, RN, discuss how they can use their leadership roles to improve cancer care.
Prior studies, like the phase 3 VISION trial, may support the notion of combining radiopharmaceuticals with best supportive care.