Good nilotinib responses in imatinib-resistant AP-CML

News
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 17 No 2
Volume 17
Issue 2

Among Ph+ chronic myelogenous leukemia patients in accelerated phase with imatinib (Gleevec) resistance or intolerance, treatment with nilotinib (Tasigna) rapidly produced significant responses and was generally well tolerated in an open-label pivotal phase II study

ATLANTA—Among Ph+ chronic myelogenous leukemia patients in accelerated phase with imatinib (Gleevec) resistance or intolerance, treatment with nilotinib (Tasigna) rapidly produced significant responses and was generally well tolerated in an open-label pivotal phase II study. Philipp le Coutre, MD, of Charite Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, reported the results at ASH 2007 (abstract 471). The study included 136 patients whose median CML duration was 71 months: 80% were imatinib resistant and 20% were imatinib intolerant.

Among the patients who completed at least one nilotinib cycle, Dr. le Coutre said, the hematologic response rate was 54% overall: 53% for imatinib-resistant patients and 56% for imatinib-intolerant patients. The complete hematologic response rate was 26%. At 12 months, hematologic responses were sustained in 82%. Major cytogenetic responses were seen in 31% (29% imatinib-resistant, 40% imatinib-intolerant), with complete cytogenetic responses in 19%. Overall survival at 12 months was 81%.

Median exposure to nilotinib was 210 days, and the median dose intensity was 781 mg/d. "The fact that the dose intensity is so close to the intended dose indicates how well tolerated this compound is," he said. However, 49% of patients required median dose interruptions of 22 days.

Nilotinib was generally well tolerated. with low rates of grade 3-4 myelosuppression. "Most grade 3-4 myelosuppression occurred within the first cycle," he said.

Dr. le Coutre concluded, "Nilotinib is an effective therapeutic option in this advanced CML population." Major cytogenetic response rates continue to increase with longer follow-up without changes in safety profile, he added.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Increasing the use of patient-reported outcomes may ensure that practitioners can fully ascertain the impact of treatment for rare lymphomas.
Retrospective and real-world registry studies may be necessary to guide clinical decision-making for rarer lymphomas with insufficient prospective data.
Ongoing studies seek to evaluate immunotherapy in earlier lines of therapy for patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma.
A paucity of prospective, well-vetted data to guide therapy in patients with rare lymphomas may result in a reliance on expert consensus guidelines.
Both clinicians and patients should have as much information as possible to participate in shared decision-making for CLL care, says Jacob D. Soumerai, MD.
Sequencing different treatments in the first 3 lines of therapy represents a challenge in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, according to Deborah Stephens, DO.
Related Content