High-Dose Fulvestrant at Least as Good as Anastrozole in First-Line MBC

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 18 No 2
Volume 18
Issue 2

There is evidence that higher doses of fulvestrant (Faslodex) may have greater activity than the approved dose of 250 mg/mo. The FIRST trial (Fulvestrant First-Line Study) compared 500 mg vs anastrozole 1 mg/d in the first-line advanced disease setting, finding that a dose of 500 mg/mo achieved response rates and clinical benefit rates similar to those obtained with anastrozole 1 mg/d but gave a significantly longer time to progression (abstract 6126).

There is evidence that higher doses of fulvestrant (Faslodex) may have greater activity than the approved dose of 250 mg/mo. The FIRST trial (Fulvestrant First-Line Study) compared 500 mg vs anastrozole 1 mg/d in the first-line advanced disease setting, finding that a dose of 500 mg/mo achieved response rates and clinical benefit rates similar to those obtained with anastrozole 1 mg/d but gave a significantly longer time to progression (abstract 6126).

The multicenter open-label study randomized 205 postmenopausal advanced breast cancer patients to fulvestrant HD (two 250-mg injections) on or about days 0, 14, and 28, and monthly thereafter, or to 1 mg/d of oral anastrozole. For 75% of patients, this was the first line of treatment for advanced disease.

The investigator-determined response rates were 36% and 35.5%, respectively, in the fulvestrant and anastrozole arms. With fulvestrant HD, the clinical benefit rate (response plus stable disease for = 24 wk) was numerically higher at 72.5% vs 67% with anastrozole. Time to progression (TTP), however, was signifi cantly longer for fulvestrant HD, with a hazard ratio of 0.63 (P < .05). Median TTP had not been reached as compared with a median TTP of 12.5 months for anastrozole.

“At the data cutoff , 29.4% of patients treated with high-dose fulvestrant had progressed compared with 41.7% of those in the anastrozole group,” reported Matthew J. Ellis, MD, PhD.

Median duration of response and duration of clinical benefit both favored fulvestrant HD.

The fulvestrant HD regimen was well tolerated, with an adverse event profile comparable with that of anastrozole and consistent with that previously reported for the standard dose. The incidence of injection site pain with fulvestrant HD (5.9%) was similar to that seen with fulvestrant 250 mg (4.6%), despite there being twice as many injections per month in the HD regimen.

The ongoing phase III CONFIRM trial (Comparison of Fulvestrant in Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer) is evaluating fulvestrant 500 mg vs 250 mg per month, which should help clarify the role of the higher dose, Dr. Ellis added.
 

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Specialties including neurosurgery, radiation oncology, and neuro-rehabilitation all play a notable role in the care of patients with brain tumors.
Treatment-related toxicities during neuro-oncology therapy appear well managed with dose modifications and treatment cycle holds.
The phase 3 NIVOSTOP trial evaluated an anti–PD-1 immunotherapy, nivolumab, in a patient population similar in the KEYNOTE-689 trial.
CAR T-cell therapies appear to be an evolving modality in the treatment of those with intracranial tumors, said Sylvia Kurz, MD, PhD.
Opportunities to further reduce relapses include pembrolizumab-based combination therapy and evaluating the agent’s contribution before and after surgery.
For patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers, the current standard of care for curative therapy has a cure rate of less than 50%.
According to Maurie Markman, MD, patient-reported outcomes pertain to more relevant questions surrounding the impact of therapy for patients.
CancerNetwork® spoke with Neha Mehta-Shah, MD, MSCI, about the clinical landscape for patients undergoing treatment for rare lymphomas.
Related Content