
Opinion|Videos|May 31, 2024
Insights from CARTITUDE-4 and KarMMa-3 in R/R MM
Experts on multiple myeloma provide their impressions of the CARTITUDE-4 and KarMMa-3 studies, which led to the approval of cilta-cel and ide-cel in earlier lines of treatment for patients with relapsed/refractory disease.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Video content above is prompted by the following questions:
- Briefly review the CARTITUDE-4 trial that led to cilta-cel’s approval in earlier lines of treatment for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM).
- Please comment on the patient population – intention-to-treat vs patients treated.
- What was the rationale for the difference? How does it affect your interpretation of the data?
- How did the safety outcomes compare with other CARTITUDE trials?
- Please share your real-world experience.
- Please review data from KarMMa-3, which led to ide-cel’s approval in earlier lines of therapy for R/R MM.
- What are thoughts on the efficacy and safety outcomes?
- Please share your real-world experience.
- How do these approvals impact the current and future treatment landscape of R/R MM?
- How might you choose one over the other?
- How does it address an unmet need?
Newsletter
Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.
Advertisement
Latest CME
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on CancerNetwork
1
Pembrolizumab Regimen May Show Synergy in Melanoma Populations
2
Chlorotoxin-Based Therapy Shows Safety, Feasibility in Glioblastoma
3
Radioembolization Plus Chemotherapy Is Feasible in Liver-Dominant NETs
4
How Supportive Care Methods Can Improve Oncology Outcomes
5



![“[This approval] will be a quite dramatic change in our philosophy and practice in multiple myeloma," according to Joseph Mikhael, MD, MEd, FRCPC, FACP, FASCO.](https://cdn.sanity.io/images/0vv8moc6/cancernetwork/3cab3ada4c023b68c118240a512e31d72a7f931b-1200x628.png?w=350&fit=crop&auto=format)















































































