KIR-ligand Mismatch in CBT Outcomes Differ Based on GVHD Prophylaxes

Article
ASTCT

ASTCT recently published an article in their journal Nucleus detailing the use of killer immunoglobulin-like receptor–ligand mismatch and its impact on graft versus host disease.

The following was recently published in ASTCT’s Nucleus publication. Follow @ATSTCT for the latest on all-things cellular therapy.

Research published in Bone Marrow Transplantation explores the impact that killer immunoglobulin (KIR)-like receptor–ligand mismatch has on graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis administered to patients receiving cord blood transplantation (CBT). The researchers determined that the KIR–ligand mismatch effects do vary depending on the type of GVHD prophylaxis given, suggesting that the KIR–ligand mismatch should be evaluated as a key factor in CBT.

Patients undergoing CBT are at risk of developing GVHD due to donor T cells attacking the transplant recipient, and are thus provided with prophylactic measures prior to transplantation in order to prevent the onset of severe GVHD side effects. In this study, patients who underwent CBT were administered 1 of 2 prophylactics (tacrolimus plus methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil), with the impacts of KIR–ligand mismatch evaluated retrospectively between the two groups.

This study demonstrated that KIR–ligand mismatch reduced overall survival by increasing non-relapse mortality. This was most apparent in the group administered the mycophenolate mofetil, whereas the KIR–ligand mismatch yields a promising result regarding instances of relapse. Furthermore, the findings suggest that the effects of KIR–ligand incompatibility differ by the type of KIR–ligand mismatch.

Reference

Yokoyama H, Hirayama M, Takahashi Y, et al. Altered effect of killer immunoglobulin-like receptor-ligand mismatch by graft versus host disease prophylaxis in cord blood transplantation . Bone Marrow Transplant. PUblished Online September 24, 2021. doi:10.1038/s41409-021-01469-6

Related Videos
Cancer vaccines are a “cross-cutting approach” that may be applicable across several cancer types, according to Catherine J. Wu, MD.
mRNA may be a potential modality for developing cancer-based vaccines, according to Catherine J. Wu, MD.
Analyzing the KRAS mutation across various cancer types may be a worthwhile target when using a cancer vaccine or immunotherapy, says Catherine J. Wu, MD.
The AACR Health Disparities Report highlights the changes needed to achieve health equity for patients with cancer.
Robert A. Winn, MD, gives insight into how institutions and community practices can improve access to cancer care.
In the October edition of Snap Recap, we review the latest FDA news and the vote from the last ODAC meeting.
In this September edition of Snap Recap, we share our highlights from Prostate Cancer Awareness Month, news in the breast cancer space, and the latest FDA updates.
Implementing tax benefits for manufacturers who produce chemotherapy drugs may be one solution to increase drug production in the United States, according to Lucio N. Gordan, MD.
Lucio N. Gordan, MD, describes how his practice deals with increasing costs of limited chemotherapy agents to ensure that patients with cancer continue to receive treatment.
Related Content