Michael Szarek, PhD, on the Rationale Behind Conducting a Q-TWiST Analysis of the Phase 3 TIVO-3 Study

Video

A Q-TWiST analysis evaluated the use of tivozanib versus sorafenib among patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma included in the phase 3 TIVO-3 study.

An analysis of tivozanib versus sorafenib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) included in the phase 3 TIVO-3 study revealed that, as a third- or fourth-line treatment, tivozanib significantly increased quality-adjusted time without symptoms of disease and toxicity (Q-TWiST) compared with sorafenib, primarily through an increase in TWiST.1

Overall, these results, presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2021 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium, suggestQ-TWiST may be considered an alternative patient-centered measure of benefit of tivozanib in these settings.

In an interview with CancerNetwork®, Michael Szarek, PhD, of the SUNY Downstate Medical Center, discussed the rationale behind conducting this analysis.

Transcription:

The TIVO-3 study was [for the] third- or fourth-line treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The primary results were published in Lancet Oncology in 2019,2 and the final overall survival results were presented at ASCO last year.3 And so, the study showed that tivozanib relative to sorafenib increased progression-free survival, with no apparent difference in overall survival. The authors in the Lancet Oncology paper also noted that there seemed to be better tolerability with tivozanib relative to sorafenib.

In this poster that was presented [at ASCO GU], we wanted to look at Q-TWiST, which is quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity, and it’s a way to basically take a patient's survival and quantify it, qualitatively and quantitatively. [Ultimately,] the study showed an increase in progression-free survival. The question is, was that also associated with a better quality of life essentially, so that was the basic motivation.

References:

1. Szarek M, Needle MN, Rini BI, et al. Q-TWiST analysis of tivozanib (T) versus sorafenib (S) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the TIVO-3 study. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 6):298. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.6_suppl.298

2. Rini BI, Pal SK, Escudier BJ, et al. Tivozanib versus sorafenib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (TIVO-3): a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(1):95-104. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30735-1

3. Pal SK, Escudier B, Atkins MB, et al. TIVO-3: Final OS analysis of a phase III, randomized, controlled, multicenter, open-label study to compare tivozanib to sorafenib in subjects with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(suppl 15):5062. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.5062

Recent Videos
Paolo Tarantino, MD discusses updated breast cancer trial findings presented at ESMO 2024 supporting the use of agents such as T-DXd and ribociclib.
Higher, durable rates of response to frontline therapy are needed to potentially improve long-term survival among patients with non–small cell lung cancer.
A review of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma shows radiological tumor burden as an independent prognostic factor for survival.
A phase 2 trial is assessing ubamatamab in patients with MUC16-expressing SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma and epithelioid sarcoma.
Analysis of 2 phase 1 trials compared gut biome diversity between standard of care with or without CBM588 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
Future meetings may address how immunotherapy, bispecific agents, and CAR T-cell therapies can further impact the AML treatment paradigm.
Related Content