Global BulletinAll NewsFDA Approval AlertWomen in Oncology
Expert InterviewsAround the PracticeBetween the LinesFace OffFrom All AnglesMeeting of the MindsOncViewPodcastsTraining AcademyTreatment Algorithms with the Oncology BrothersVideos
Conferences
All JournalsEditorial BoardFor AuthorsYear in Review
Frontline ForumSatellite Sessions
CME/CE
Awareness MonthInteractive ToolsNurse Practitioners/Physician's AssistantsPartnersSponsoredSponsored Media
Career CenterSubscribe
Adverse Effects
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
Lymphoma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
Spotlight -
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Surgery
Adverse Effects
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
Lymphoma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
    • Conferences
    • CME/CE
    • Career Center
    • Subscribe

Your AI-Trained Oncology Knowledge Connection!

scout
Advertisement

Navtemadlin Shows Efficacy, Safety in Relapsed/Refractory Myelofibrosis

December 12, 2024
By Alex Biese
Fact checked by Darlene Dobkowski, MA
News
Article
Conference|American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting & Exposition (ASH)

Navtemadlin yields improvements in symptom score reductions ad spleen volume reduction among patients with relapsed/refractory myelofibrosis.

"In a drug that's given repeatedly, this is reversible toxicity, not [felt] through the constant 28 days of the cycle. [It’s the] same thing with hematologic toxicity, [which was] very predictable in its occurrence and very fleeting in its duration," according to study author John O. Mascarenhas, MD.

"In a drug that's given repeatedly, this is reversible toxicity, not [felt] through the constant 28 days of the cycle. [It’s the] same thing with hematologic toxicity, [which was] very predictable in its occurrence and very fleeting in its duration," according to study author John O. Mascarenhas, MD.

Safety and efficacy were reported among patients with relapsed/refractory myelofibrosis who received treatment with navtemadlin, which yielded improvements in outcomes vs best available therapy (BAT), according to findings from the phase 3 BOREAS study (NCT03662126) presented at the 2024 American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting & Exposition (ASH).

Data showed that at a data cut-off of September 30, 2024, regarding spleen volume reduction by 35% (SVR35), patients treated with navtemadlin experienced a 3-fold increase in SVR35 (15%; n = 18/123) vs BAT (5%; n = 3/60) at week 24.

Concerning total symptom score reductions of at least 50% (TSS50), patients treated with navtemadlin saw a 2-fold increase in TSS50 (24%; n = 30/123) compared with BAT (12%; n = 7/60) at week 24. In the intention-to-treat population, the mean absolute TSS change from baseline to week 24 was -4.6 in the navtemadlin group compared with 0.9 in the BAT group (P = .0078; least square mean difference -5.5; 95% CI, -9.6 to -1.5).

In the navtemadlin cohort, treatment-emergent adverse effects (TEAEs) included gastrointestinal (GI) events such as nausea (any grade, 42%; grade 3/4, 4%), diarrhea (41%; 6%), and vomiting (25%; 2%). These had median times to onset of 4 (range, 1-530), 8 (range, 1-384), and 30 (range, 1-477) days, respectively, and had median times to resolution of 9 (range, 1-348), 7 (range, 1-338), and 4 (range, 1-24) days.

Hematologic TEAEs of note included anemia (any grade, 36%; grade 3/4 29%), neutropenia (30%; 25%), and thrombocytopenia (46%; 37%). The median times to onset were 30 (range, 1-289), 29 (range, 8-176), and 29 (range, 8-253) days, respectively, and times to resolution of 8 (range, 1-369), 9 (range, 2-169), and 14 (range, 1-387) days, respectively.

“Expecting GI toxicity, this is mostly grade 1 and 2, … rarely grade 3 and 4, rarely a reason for discontinuation,” said John O. Mascarenhas, MD, of the Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, in a presentation of the data at the conference.“Very importantly, the time to onset for GI toxicity was pretty predictable. The drug is dosed days 1 to 7 out of a 28-day cycle, [and] you almost always would see the GI toxicity days two to nine. But very important, if you look at time to resolution, the measuring in days, 9, 4, and 7. So, this is reversible toxicity, very importantly. In a drug that's given repeatedly, this is reversible toxicity, not [felt] through the constant 28 days of the cycle. [It’s the] same thing with hematologic toxicity, [which was] very predictable in its occurrence and very fleeting in its duration.”

Among its 183 participating patients, they were a median of 48.1 (range, 0.4-368.3) months from initial diagnosis in the navtemadlin cohort and 45.2 (range, 5-292.3) months from diagnosis in the BAT cohort. They had received a median of 1 prior line of therapy in both cohorts (ranges, 1-6 and 1-5, respectively).

“The BOREAS study is undoubtedly the first study in the relapsed, refractory setting as a single-agent, JAK inhibitor failure to show results,” Mascarenhas concluded. “Here today, [with these] clinical results, I think you'll see that there is clinically relevant efficacy and safety ... [with the] tripling of SVR35 and doubling of TSS50.

“And, the next step for the evaluation of navtemadlin is going to be the [phase 3] POIESIS study [NCT06479135]...This is going to be evaluating navtemadlin in the sub-optimal responders to see if we can move the drug even further up in its development pathway and benefit patients earlier on.”

Reference

Mascarenhas JO, Popov VM, Mohan S, et al., Results from the Randomized, Multicenter, Global Phase 3 BOREAS Study: Navtemadlin Versus Best Available Therapy in JAK Inhibitor Relapsed/Refractory Myelofibrosis, Presented at: 2024 American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting; December 7-10, 2024; San Diego, California. Abstract 1000.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Subscribe Now!
Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
Related Content

Shebli Atrash, MD, believes the future for treatment in multiple myeloma, as well as solid tumors and beyond, includes immune therapies.

Defining the Role of Immune Therapy in Multiple Myeloma

Roman Fabbricatore
August 19th 2025
Article

A panel of clinical pharmacists discussed strategies for mitigating toxicities across different multiple myeloma, lymphoma, and leukemia populations.

Navigating AE Management for Cellular Therapy Across Hematologic Cancers

Tiba Al Sagheer, PharmD, BCOP, BCACP;Rebecca Gonzalez, PharmD, BCOP, FASTCT;Syeda Saba Kareem PharmD, BCOP
August 19th 2025
Podcast

Cellular therapies are a treatment modality that hold promise in various cancer types.

Cross-Collaboration is Key for Cellular Therapies Options Across Cancer Types

Tim Cortese
August 19th 2025
Article

Experts share their perspectives on updated clinical trial results, personalized cancer vaccine research, and other notable developments in kidney cancer.

Key Advances Across Kidney Cancer Research and Management at KCRS 2025

Thomas Powles, MBBS, MCRP, MD;David Braun, MD, PhD;Wenxin (Vincent) Xu, MD;Eric Jonasch, MD
August 19th 2025
Podcast

Leading experts gathered in Orlando, FL, to discuss the current and future state of cellular therapy in oncology at the 2025 ICE-T Symposium.

National ICE-T Conference Aims to Make CAR T Safer and More Available

Tim Cortese
August 19th 2025
Article

Barry Paul, MD, believes cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel are some of the most promising CAR T-cell therapies in the multiple myeloma space.

CAR T-Cell Therapies Show Superior Efficacy, Safety in Multiple Myeloma

Tim Cortese
August 19th 2025
Article
Related Content

Shebli Atrash, MD, believes the future for treatment in multiple myeloma, as well as solid tumors and beyond, includes immune therapies.

Defining the Role of Immune Therapy in Multiple Myeloma

Roman Fabbricatore
August 19th 2025
Article

A panel of clinical pharmacists discussed strategies for mitigating toxicities across different multiple myeloma, lymphoma, and leukemia populations.

Navigating AE Management for Cellular Therapy Across Hematologic Cancers

Tiba Al Sagheer, PharmD, BCOP, BCACP;Rebecca Gonzalez, PharmD, BCOP, FASTCT;Syeda Saba Kareem PharmD, BCOP
August 19th 2025
Podcast

Cellular therapies are a treatment modality that hold promise in various cancer types.

Cross-Collaboration is Key for Cellular Therapies Options Across Cancer Types

Tim Cortese
August 19th 2025
Article

Experts share their perspectives on updated clinical trial results, personalized cancer vaccine research, and other notable developments in kidney cancer.

Key Advances Across Kidney Cancer Research and Management at KCRS 2025

Thomas Powles, MBBS, MCRP, MD;David Braun, MD, PhD;Wenxin (Vincent) Xu, MD;Eric Jonasch, MD
August 19th 2025
Podcast

Leading experts gathered in Orlando, FL, to discuss the current and future state of cellular therapy in oncology at the 2025 ICE-T Symposium.

National ICE-T Conference Aims to Make CAR T Safer and More Available

Tim Cortese
August 19th 2025
Article

Barry Paul, MD, believes cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel are some of the most promising CAR T-cell therapies in the multiple myeloma space.

CAR T-Cell Therapies Show Superior Efficacy, Safety in Multiple Myeloma

Tim Cortese
August 19th 2025
Article
Advertisement
About
Advertise
CureToday.com
OncLive.com
OncNursingNews.com
TargetedOnc.com
Editorial
Contact
Terms and Conditions
Privacy
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Contact Info

2 Commerce Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512

609-716-7777

© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.