Robert J. Motzer, MD, on the Results of the Phase 3 CLEAR Trial for Advanced RCC

Video

The CLEAR trial compared treatment with lenvatinib plus either pembrolizumab or everolimus versus sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Results from the phase 3 CLEAR trial (NCT02811861), presented at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Genitourinary Cancers Symposium, found that compared with sunitinib (Sutent), combination treatment with lenvatinib (Lenvima) and pembrolizumab (Keytruda) demonstrated significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) among patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Additionally, combination treatment with lenvatinib plus everolimus (Afinitor) demonstrated significant improvements in PFS and ORR within this patient population.

Importantly, the safety profile of each combination was also found to be manageable and consistent with the known single-agent profiles.

In this study, participants were randomized 1:1:1 to receive either lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab, lenvatinib plus everolimus, or sunitinib. The primary end point was PFS by Independent Review Committee per RECIST v1.1; secondary end points included OS, ORR, and safety.

In an interview with CancerNetwork®, Robert J. Motzer, MD, a medical oncologist at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, spoke about the results of this study and what the data indicate regarding the best treatment option.

Transcription:

The results of the analysis [were] really striking. The primary end points were progression-free survival for both lenvatinib and pembrolizumab [as well as] lenvatinib and everolimus versus sunitinib, and the trial met the primary endpoint for each of those arms showing a longer progression-free survival compared to sunitinib. There [were also] higher response rates with each of the lenvatinib-containing arms, and particularly striking was the high response rate of 71% with lenavtinib [and] pembrolizumab.

What differentiated the 2 arms in combination with sunitinib was this survival analysis. For lenvatinib [and] pembrolizumab, there was a survival benefit compared to sunitinib; but we didn’t see that survival benefit with lenvatinib [and] everolimus. The response rates were higher with both combinations, but they were the highest with lenvatinib [and pembrolizumab]. Progression-free survival [was also] longer but really the longest with lenvatinib [and pembrolizumab]. The high proportion of complete responses and survival benefit [observed with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab] make that the preferable choice of treatment in that trial.

Reference:

Motzer RJ, Porta C, Eto M, et al. Phase 3 trial of lenvatinib (LEN) plus pembrolizumab (PEMBRO) or everolimus (EVE) versus sunitinib (SUN) monotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients (pts) with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (CLEAR study). J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 6):269. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.6_suppl.269

Recent Videos
James Ninia, MD, discussed treatment options for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer undergoing metastasis-directed radiotherapy.
Paolo Tarantino, MD discusses updated breast cancer trial findings presented at ESMO 2024 supporting the use of agents such as T-DXd and ribociclib.
Higher, durable rates of response to frontline therapy are needed to potentially improve long-term survival among patients with non–small cell lung cancer.
A review of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma shows radiological tumor burden as an independent prognostic factor for survival.
A phase 2 trial is assessing ubamatamab in patients with MUC16-expressing SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma and epithelioid sarcoma.
Analysis of 2 phase 1 trials compared gut biome diversity between standard of care with or without CBM588 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
Related Content