Commentary on Abstract #1701

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 13 No 3
Volume 13
Issue 3

As more new therapeutic agents enter clinical trials, it becomes increasingly more important to have standardized response criteria. Uniform guidelines facilitate acquisition of comparable data, interpretation of data, comparisons of the results among various clinical trials, and identification of new agents with promising activity.

As more new therapeutic agents enter clinical trials, it becomes increasingly more important to have standardized response criteria. Uniform guidelines facilitate acquisition of comparable data, interpretation of data, comparisons of the results among various clinical trials, and identification of new agents with promising activity.

The importance of such standardization is emphasized by the abstract of Grillo-López et al (abstract #1701). To be classified as a “complete remission,” protocols require that enlarged lymph nodes return to “normal” size. However, what is considered “normal” varies among trials. Grillo- López and coworkers demonstrated that merely increasing the definition of “normal” lymph node size from 1.0 to 1.5 cm resulted in an increase in the complete response rate from 6% to 18% (abstract #1701). An international group of lymphoma experts have developed a series of standardized guidelines for response and definitions of outcomes, which will be published in the April 1999 issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology. (Cheson et al: J Clin Oncol, 1999 [in press]).

Articles in this issue

WHO Declares Lymphatic Mapping to Be the Standard of Care for Melanoma
Rituximab: Phase II Retreatment Study in Patients With Low-Grade or Follicular Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
Response Criteria for NHL: Importance of “Normal” Lymph Node Size and Correlations With Response
Chemotherapy Plus Radiation Improves Survival in Patients With Cervical Cancer
A Randomized Trial of Fludarabine, Mitoxantrone (FM) Versus Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide, Vindesine, Prednisone (CHEP) as First Line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Low-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Multicenter Study by GOELAMS Group
Navelbine Increased Elderly Lung Cancer Patients’ Survival
Fludarabine Versus Conventional CVP Chemotherapy in Newly C Diagnosed Patients With Stages III and IV Low-Grade Malignant Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: Preliminary Results From a Prospective, Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial in 381 Patients
Multicenter, Phase III Study of Iodine-131 Tositumomab (Anti-B1 Antibody) for Chemotherapy-Refractory Low-Grade or Transformed Low-Grade Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
T-Cell–Depleted Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplant From HLA-Matched Sibling Donors for Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
Consensus Statement on Prevention and Early Diagnosis of Lung Cancer
In Vivo Purging and Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Rituximab During PBSC Transplant For NHL
Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide: A Highly Active and Well-Tolerated Regimen for Patients With Previously Untreated Indolent Lymphomas
Campath-1H Monoclonal Antibody in Therapy for Advanced Low-Grade Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphomas: A Phase II Study
AIDS Drugs Effective Against Most Common HIV Strain
Rituximab Therapy in Previously Treated Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia: Preliminary Evidence of Activity
Related Videos
A panel of 3 experts on multiple myeloma
A panel of 3 experts on multiple myeloma
A panel of 3 experts on multiple myeloma
Aparna Parikh, MD, with the Oncology Brothers presenting slides
Aparna Parikh, MD, with the Oncology Brothers presenting slides
Aparna Parikh, MD, with the Oncology Brothers presenting slides
Aparna Parikh, MD, with the Oncology Brothers presenting slides