
Opinion|Videos|February 6, 2025
Considerations for Second-Line Treatment Decisions in EGFR+ NSCLC: Sequencing Strategies and First-Line Choices
Dr. Garon explains the factors guiding his choice between EGFR inhibitors for EGFR+ NSCLC and when he might consider alternatives like afatinib or erlotinib.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Video content above is prompted by the following:
- What factors influence your treatment decisions in the second line?
- Do you think about sequencing options when choosing first-line treatments for patients with EGRF+ NSCLC?
Advertisement
Related to this article

Subcutaneous amivantamab is safer and more convenient for patients compared with the intravenous formulation, according to Misako Nagasaka, MD, PhD.

Investigators are evaluating cesalatamig among patients with advanced cancer in the international phase 1/2 BiPAVE-001 trial.

The FDA granted fast track designation to the oral pan-KRAS inhibitor KST-6051 for patients with KRAS-mutant advanced or metastatic solid tumors.

Based on updated data from the TRUST-1 trial, a sNDA for taletrectinib has been approved by the FDA for patients with TKI-naive ROS1+ NSCLC.

Misako Nagasaka, MD, PhD, explains how subcutaneous amivantamab’s shorter administration time benefits patients and infusion centers.

Misako Nagasaka, MD, PhD, discusses PALOMA-2’s 70% 3-year survival rate compared with historical MARIPOSA data for intravenous amivantamab.

The OMNI-EGFR inhibitor BH-30643 produced a 45% objective response rate among patients with EGFR C797S–positive disease in the phase 1/2 SOLARA trial.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on CancerNetwork
1
CELMoDs After T-Cell–Engaging Therapy in Multiple Myeloma
2
Key Takeaways for Multidisciplinary Lung Cancer Care From WCLC 2026
3
FDA Approves Imlunestrant Combo in ESR1-Mutated Breast Cancer
4
Pembrolizumab/Enfortumab Vedotin Earns Positive CHMP Opinion in MIBC
5

