FDA Approves Taletrectinib in ROS1+ NSCLC

Fact checked by Russ Conroy
News
Article

Supporting results for the approval of taletrectinib in ROS1+ NSCLC come from the TRUST-I and TRUST-II trials.

The approval is based on results from the phase 2 TRUST-I trial (NCT04395677) and the phase 2 TRUST-II trial (NCT04919811).

The approval is based on results from the phase 2 TRUST-I trial (NCT04395677) and the phase 2 TRUST-II trial (NCT04919811).

The FDA has approved taletrectinib (Ibtrozi) for patients with locally advanced or metastatic ROS1-positive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), according to a press release from the agency.1

The approval is based on results from the phase 2 TRUST-I trial (NCT04395677) and the phase 2 TRUST-II trial (NCT04919811). Additionally, results were presented at the 2025 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting.2

Topline data showed that in patients with no prior treatment, the objective response rate (ORR) was 90% (95% CI, 83%-95%) in TRUST-I compared with 85% (95% CI, 73%-93%) in TRUST-II, with 72% and 63% experiencing responses for at least 6 months. Among those with pretreated disease, the respective ORRs were 52% (95% CI, 39%-64%) and 62% (95% CI, 46%-75%) in each study population; 74% and 83% of patients with a response had responses lasting for a minimum of 6 months.

The TRUST-I trial enrolled patients in China who had no prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy or had received prior treatment with crizotinib (Xalkori). The TRUST-II trial enrolled patients who were TKI-naïve and had received prior treatment with crizotinib or entrectinib (Rozlytrek).

Investigators previously presented pooled results on patients from both the TRUST-I and TRUST-II trials, including those who were TKI-naïve or TKI-pretreated. In previously presented results, the pooled analysis showed that the confirmed ORR (cORR) was 88.8% (95% CI, 82.8%-93.2%) in the TKI-naïve population, with 8 patients having a complete response (CR) and 134 having a partial response.3 Additionally, the disease control rate was 95.0% (95% CI, 90.4%-97.8%).

For patients who received prior chemotherapy, the ORR was 87.5% (95% CI, 71.0%-96.4%) vs 89.1% (95% CI, 82.3%-93.9%) for those who did not receive chemotherapy. For patients who experienced a CR, the median duration of response (DOR) was 44.2 months (95% CI, 30.4-not reached [NR]), and the estimated 36-month DOR rate was 57.7% (95% CI, 45.0%-68.5%).

The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 45.6 months (95% CI, 29.0-NR), and the estimated 12-month PFS rate was 39.7% (95% CI, 29.6%-49.6%). The median OS was NR, and the estimated 12-month OS rate was 77.5% (95% CI, 68.1%-84.5%).

The intracranial ORR for patients who were TKI-naïve was 76.5% (95% CI, 50.1%-93.2%), the DCR was 88.2% (95% CI, 63.6%-98.5%), and the median DOR was 14.7 months (95% CI, 4.2-30.2). For those pretreated with TKIs, the intracranial ORR was 65.6% (95% CI, 46.8%-81.4%), with a DCR of 93.8% (95% CI, 79.2%-99.2%) and a median DOR of 11.9 months (95% CI, 6.9-23.5).

Additional results presented at ASCO showed that the cORR in the TRUST-I and TRUST-II trials among patients who were TKI-naïve was 90.3% vs 85.2% (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.83-1.07); for those who had prior chemotherapy, it was 85.0% vs 90.0% (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.80-1.40); and for those without prior chemotherapy, it was 91.6% vs 84.1% (RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.80-1.06). For those who were pretreated with TKIs, the cORR was 51.5% vs 61.7% (RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.87-1.66); for those with prior chemotherapy, it was 43.5% vs 78.9% (RR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.08-3.06); and for those without prior chemotherapy, it was 55.8% vs 50.0% (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.57-1.41).

The cORR was also comparable across race and region between the 2 trials. For those who were Asian and TKI-naïve, the cORR was 89.1% vs 84.2% for those who were non-Asian (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.77-1.16); the cORR was 83.3% vs 100% for those who received prior chemotherapy (RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.00-1.44); and for those without prior chemotherapy, it was 90.4% vs 76.9% (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.63-1.15). For those who were pretreated with TKIs, the cORR was 53.4% vs 64.0% (RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.84-1.71); with prior chemotherapy, it was 53.1% vs 80.0% (RR, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.96-2.36); and without chemotherapy, it was 53.6% vs 53.3% (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.58-1.70).

For those who lived in non-Western areas and were TKI-naïve, the cORR was 89.7% vs 81.0% for those in Western areas (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.73-1.12), 83.3% vs 100% (RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.00-1.44) for those with prior chemotherapy, and 91.1% vs 73.3% (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.59-1.10) for those without prior chemotherapy. For those who were TKI-pretreated, the cORR was 52.9% vs 65.4% overall (RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.88-1.74), 53.1% vs 80.0% (RR, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.96-2.36) in those who had prior chemotherapy, and 52.7% vs 56.3% (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.65-1.76) in those who did not have prior chemotherapy.

Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse effects (TEAEs) occurred in 54.3% vs 52.6% in the TRUST-I and TRUST-II trials, respectively (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.80-1.18). Grade 3 or higher alanine transaminase (ALT) or aspartate transaminase (AST) elevation occurred in 20.2% vs 18.1% (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.58-1.38), and grade 3 or higher gastrointestinal (GI) disorders occurred in 5.8% vs 4.1% (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.28-1.82).

For those who were Asian, grade 3 or higher TEAEs were observed in 53.0% of patients vs 54.9% who were not Asian (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.83-1.29), AST/ALT elevation in 18.6% vs 20.9% (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.70-1.81), and GI disorders in 4.7% vs 5.5% (RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.42-3.20).

For those who lived in non-Western areas, grade 3 or higher TEAEs were observed in 52.6% vs 55.7% who lived in Western areas (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.85-1.31), ALT/AST elevation was observed in 18.6% vs 20.6% (RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.69-1.77), and GI disorders occurred in 4.9% vs 5.2% (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.38-2.93).

The FDA granted priority review to taletrectinib for patients with ROS1-positive NSCLC in December 2024.4

References

  1. FDA approves taletrectinib for ROS1-positive non-small cell lung cancer. News release. FDA. June 11, 2025. Accessed June 1, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/yc4f379m
  2. Pérol M, Li W, Pennell NA, et al. Comparable efficacy and safety of taletrectinib for advanced ROS1+ non–small cell lung cancer across pivotal studies and between races and world regions. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(16). doi:10.1200/JCO.2025.43.16_suppl.8643
  3. Pérol M, Li W, Pennell NA, et al. Taletrectinib in ROS1+ non-small cell lung cancer: TRUST. J Clin Oncol. Published online April 3, 2025. doi:10.1200/JCO-25-00275
  4. U.S. Food and Drug Administration accepts for priority review Nuvation Bio’s new drug application for taletrectinib for the treatment of advanced ROS1-positive non-small cell lung cancer. News release. Nuvation Bio. December 23, 2024. Accessed June 10, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/bfty8jfw

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Stage IV lung cancer may be curable based on the success of the DREAM Program, according to thoracic surgeon, Ankit Bharat, MBBS,
Ankit Bharat, MBBS, a thoracic surgeon, discussed potential treatment emergent adverse effects or complications, as well as strategies for managing them.
Thoracic surgeon, Ankit Bharat, MBBS, discussed surgical strategies among patients with advanced lung cancer diagnoses based on staging.
2 experts in this video
2 experts in this video
2 experts in this video
2 experts in this video
Treatment with lorlatinib might be effective regardless of the presence of central nervous system metastases, according to Misako Nagasaka, MD, PhD.
Most central nervous system events with lorlatinib were grade 1 or 2 in the phase 3 CROWN trial.
Treatment with lorlatinib did not increase cardiovascular events among patients with ALK-positive non–small cell lung cancer in the CROWN trial.
Related Content