Panelists discuss how conventional chemotherapy remains a key frontline treatment for advanced or metastatic epithelioid sarcoma (ES), while emerging targeted therapies, guided by molecular profiling and biomarkers like INI1 loss, offer personalized treatment options for patients with specific molecular alterations.
Summary for Physicians: Frontline Treatment Strategies for Advanced or Metastatic ES
Role of Conventional Chemotherapy: Conventional chemotherapy remains a cornerstone in the treatment of advanced or metastatic ES, particularly in patients with aggressive disease or those who are not candidates for surgery or radiation. Common chemotherapy options include ifosfamide and gemcitabine, often used in combination to improve efficacy. Chemotherapy is preferred in patients with rapidly progressing disease or those who require systemic treatment due to widespread metastasis. Patient factors such as performance status, prior treatment history, and potential for adverse effects guide the decision to select chemotherapy. The choice of regimen depends on the balance between efficacy and toxicity, with clinical considerations such as comorbidities influencing treatment decisions.
Role of Targeted Therapy: Targeted therapies are increasingly explored in the frontline setting, particularly for patients whose tumors exhibit specific molecular characteristics. Options may include agents targeting key pathways involved in ES, such as those related to the INI1 (SMARCB1) loss. Targeted therapy may be preferred in patients with molecular alterations that predict sensitivity to specific drugs. The decision to opt for targeted therapy is often based on the availability of biomarkers, the patient’s molecular profile, and previous treatment responses.
Biomarker testing, including genomic profiling, plays an integral role in selecting patients for targeted therapies, helping to identify those with actionable mutations or pathways amenable to treatment. These tests can provide insights into which therapies may be most effective and help personalize treatment decisions for individual patients.
Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.
Prolaris in Practice: Guiding ADT Benefits, Clinical Application, and Expert Insights From ACRO 2025
April 15th 2025Steven E. Finkelstein, MD, DABR, FACRO discuses how Prolaris distinguishes itself from other genomic biomarker platforms by providing uniquely actionable clinical information that quantifies the absolute benefit of androgen deprivation therapy when added to radiation therapy, offering clinicians a more precise tool for personalizing prostate cancer treatment strategies.
Recap: Recent Advances in the Treatment of Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer
September 18th 2022Expert oncologists review key studies in the metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treatment landscape and discuss how evidence can be applied to clinical practice to improve patient outcomes.
CCR Scores and Beyond: Precision Strategies for Treatment Intensification in Prostate Cancer
April 15th 2025Alvaro Martinez, MD discusses how emerging genomic risk stratification tools such as the clinical cell-cycle risk (CCR) score are transforming personalized prostate cancer treatment by enabling more nuanced assessments of metastasis risk and treatment intensification strategies beyond traditional NCCN risk groupings.
Recap: Updates in Treatment of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases
July 16th 2022Sara A. Hurvitz, MD; Stefania Maraka, MD; and Ruta Rao, MD, discuss the evolving landscape of metastatic HER2+ breast cancer, highlighting recent clinical trials and the management of patients with brain metastases.
Recap: Emory Experts Review Treatment Strategies for Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma
June 20th 2022A panel of experts from Emory University review several key data updates in multiple myeloma from recent meetings and discuss how the data can be applied to clinical practice to improve patient outcomes.