(S034) Do Sociodemographic Factors Influence Outcome in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT)? 

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 28 No 4_Suppl_1
Volume 28
Issue 4_Suppl_1

To determine if there is an influence of sociodemographic factors on biochemical control (bNED) and overall survival (OS) in prostate cancer (CaP).

Avielle Y. Movsas, Ramy Ibrahim, MD, Mohamed A. Elshaikh, MD, Lois Lamerato, PhD, Mei Lu, PhD, Alexandra Sitarik, MS, Deepak Pradhan, MD, Eleanor M. Walker, MD, Hans Stricker, MD, Svend O. Freytag, PhD, Indrin Chetty, PhD, Benjamin Movsas, MD, Farzan Siddiqui, MD, PhD; Henry Ford Hospital

Objectives: To determine if there is an influence of sociodemographic factors on biochemical control (bNED) and overall survival (OS) in prostate cancer (CaP).

Methods: CaP patients treated with definitive EBRT ± hormone therapy (HT) from 1997–2006 were analyzed. Patient demographics, treatment (Tx), and clinical outcomes were obtained from electronic medical records. Median household income (mHHI) at the census block group level was obtained from the 2000 census data. Data on disease and Tx parameters included Gleason score, pre-Tx prostate-specific antigen (PSA), T-stage, year of Tx, EBRT dose and technique, and use of HT. Patients were categorized as having low-, intermediate-, or high-risk disease. Sociodemographic factors included age, race, marital status, and mHHI. Biochemical failure was defined as nadir PSA + 2 ng/mL. OS was based on death from any cause.

Results: A total of 788 consecutive patients were studied, with a median follow-up of 7 years. African Americans (AAs) constituted 48% of the patients, while 46% of patients were white and 6% was other. Whites had an average mHHI of $59,235 compared with $36,917 for AAs (P < .001). After multivariable modeling, only radiation dose was predictive for bNED or OS. For biochemical failure, compared with radiation dose < 70 Gy, the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49–0.98) for 70–74 Gy and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.31–0.74) for ≥ 75 Gy; for mortality, the HR was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.50–0.89) for 70-74 Gy and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.43–0.89) for ≥ 75 Gy. No sociodemographic factors were predictive of either outcome.

Conclusions: This analysis suggests that sociodemographic factors are not prognostic in determining outcome in prostate cancer, as long as patients have access to current standards of care. Rather, only a treatment factor-the radiation dose-predicted for bNED and OS.

Proceedings of the 96th Annual Meeting of the American Radium Society - americanradiumsociety.org

Articles in this issue

(S002) Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma Metastases
(S001) Limb-Sparing Surgery and Intraoperative Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Primary, Nonmetastatic Extremity and Limb-Girdle Soft Tissue Sarcoma
(S003) Disparities in Stage at Diagnosis and Survival in Adult Cancer Patients According to Insurance Status
(S004) Radiation Publications Underrepresented in High-Impact General Medical and Oncology Journals 
(S005) Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Stage II Endometrial Carcinoma: Is Brachytherapy Alone Sufficient for Local Control?
(S006) Extended-Field IMRT With Concomitant Boost for Node-Positive Cervical Cancer: Analysis of Regional Control Rate and Recurrence Pattern
(S007) Stereotactic Radiosurgery to the Brain With Concurrent BRAF Inhibitors for Melanoma Metastases
(S008) Use of Mobile Devices for Creation of Survivorship Care Plans
(S009) Two-Year Outcomes Following Triapine Radiochemotherapy for Cervical Cancer 
(S010) Prospective and Real-Time Data Analysis of Image-Guided Radiotherapy Across a Multinational Pediatrics Consortium: Methodology and Considerations 
(S011) Comparison of Toxicities and Outcomes for Conventional and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Early Glottic Carcinoma
(S013) Adjuvant Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide for Anaplastic Gliomas: The Twelve-Year Washington University Experience
(S014) Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Treatment of Brainstem Metastases
(S015) Temporal Lobe Radionecrosis After Skull Base Radiotherapy: Dose-Volume Predictors 
(S012) Prognostic Value of Radiographic Extracapsular Extension in Locally Advanced Non-Oropharyngeal Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancers
Recent Videos
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
Future meetings may address how immunotherapy, bispecific agents, and CAR T-cell therapies can further impact the AML treatment paradigm.
Treatment with revumenib appeared to demonstrate efficacy among patients with KMT2A-rearranged acute leukemia in the phase 2 AUGMENT-101 study.
Advocacy groups such as Cancer Support Community and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society may help support patients with CML undergoing treatment.
Paolo Tarantino, MD, discusses the potential utility of agents such as datopotamab deruxtecan and enfortumab vedotin in patients with breast cancer.
Paolo Tarantino, MD, highlights strategies related to screening and multidisciplinary collaboration for managing ILD in patients who receive T-DXd.
Data from the REVEAL study affirm elevated white blood cell counts and higher variant allele frequency as risk factors for progression in polycythemia vera.
Related Content