(S001) Limb-Sparing Surgery and Intraoperative Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Primary, Nonmetastatic Extremity and Limb-Girdle Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 28 No 4_Suppl_1
Volume 28
Issue 4_Suppl_1

To investigate the efficacy and morbidity of limb-sparing surgery with intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for patients with primary, nonmetastatic extremity and limb-girdle soft tissue sarcoma (STS) at high risk for recurrence.

Christopher L. Tinkle, MD, Richard J. O’Donnell, MD, Vivian Weinberg, PhD, Stuart Y. Tsuji, MD, Daphne Haas-Kogan, MD, Alexander R. Gottschalk, MD, PhD; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco; Department of Radiation Oncology, The Queen’s Medical Center

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy and morbidity of limb-sparing surgery with intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for patients with primary, nonmetastatic extremity and limb-girdle soft tissue sarcoma (STS) at high risk for recurrence.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients with extremity and limb-girdle STS treated with IORT following limb-sparing resection by a single orthopedic oncologist at the University of California, San Francisco, from December 1998 through November 2011. Sixty-six consecutively treated patients with primary, nonmetastatic STS were identified. Upfront oncologic resection was performed in 67% of patients, while re-resection of prior excisional biopsy was performed in 33%. Close (< 2 mm) or positive margins were found in 59% of patients. Sixty-seven percent received both IORT and external beam radiation (EBRT), with a median IORT dose of 1,250 cGy (range: 1,000–1,800 cGy) and median EBRT dose of 5,970 cGy (range: 4,140–6,660 cGy). Perioperative chemotherapy was delivered to 61% of patients. The most common histologies were synovial sarcoma and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (38% and 17%, respectively), and most tumors were high-grade (Coindre grade 2–3) (88%), deep in location (79%), and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pathologic stage II or higher (88%). The Kaplan-Meier product limit method was used to estimate disease control and survival, subsets were compared using a log-rank statistic, and toxicity was reported according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (CTCAE v4) guidelines.

Results: With a median duration of follow-up from surgery and IORT of 50.9 months (range: 11.8–141.5 mo), 13 patients developed a local recurrence, with 4 subsequently undergoing amputation. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates for local control were 78% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65%–87%); 94% for amputation-free survival (95% CI, 84%–98%); 72% for metastasis-free control (95% CI, 59%–82%); 64% for disease-free survival (95% CI, 50%–75%); and 81% for overall survival (95% CI, 68%–90%). Age older than 50 years and having AJCC stage III disease resulted in increased local recurrence (P = .02 and P = .06, respectively), while other factors, including margin status, tumor grade, T stage, tumor depth, re-resection, and perioperative chemotherapy, did not impact local control. Interestingly, the addition of EBRT did not appear to significantly influence local control, with a 5-year estimate of local control for patients who did not receive EBRT of 71%, compared with 82% for those who did (P = .28). This was also the case in patients treated with perioperative chemotherapy (P = .58) and grade 3 tumors (P = .56); however, a benefit with EBRT was observed for those with close/positive margins (P = .01). Grade 3 or higher acute and late toxicities were reported in 16 and 18 patients, respectively.

Conclusions: IORT in combination with oncologic resection of high-risk extremity and limb-girdle STS yields excellent rates of local control and limb salvage with acceptable morbidity. This technique offers a method of delivering focal therapy to reduce the risk associated with close/positive margins while maintaining adequate local control with relatively reduced-dose EBRT.

Proceedings of the 96th Annual Meeting of the American Radium Society - americanradiumsociety.org

Articles in this issue

(S002) Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma Metastases
(S001) Limb-Sparing Surgery and Intraoperative Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Primary, Nonmetastatic Extremity and Limb-Girdle Soft Tissue Sarcoma
(S003) Disparities in Stage at Diagnosis and Survival in Adult Cancer Patients According to Insurance Status
(S004) Radiation Publications Underrepresented in High-Impact General Medical and Oncology Journals 
(S005) Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Stage II Endometrial Carcinoma: Is Brachytherapy Alone Sufficient for Local Control?
(S006) Extended-Field IMRT With Concomitant Boost for Node-Positive Cervical Cancer: Analysis of Regional Control Rate and Recurrence Pattern
(S007) Stereotactic Radiosurgery to the Brain With Concurrent BRAF Inhibitors for Melanoma Metastases
(S008) Use of Mobile Devices for Creation of Survivorship Care Plans
(S009) Two-Year Outcomes Following Triapine Radiochemotherapy for Cervical Cancer 
(S010) Prospective and Real-Time Data Analysis of Image-Guided Radiotherapy Across a Multinational Pediatrics Consortium: Methodology and Considerations 
(S011) Comparison of Toxicities and Outcomes for Conventional and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Early Glottic Carcinoma
(S013) Adjuvant Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide for Anaplastic Gliomas: The Twelve-Year Washington University Experience
(S014) Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Treatment of Brainstem Metastases
(S015) Temporal Lobe Radionecrosis After Skull Base Radiotherapy: Dose-Volume Predictors 
(S012) Prognostic Value of Radiographic Extracapsular Extension in Locally Advanced Non-Oropharyngeal Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancers
Recent Videos
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
Future meetings may address how immunotherapy, bispecific agents, and CAR T-cell therapies can further impact the AML treatment paradigm.
Treatment with revumenib appeared to demonstrate efficacy among patients with KMT2A-rearranged acute leukemia in the phase 2 AUGMENT-101 study.
Advocacy groups such as Cancer Support Community and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society may help support patients with CML undergoing treatment.
Paolo Tarantino, MD, discusses the potential utility of agents such as datopotamab deruxtecan and enfortumab vedotin in patients with breast cancer.
Paolo Tarantino, MD, highlights strategies related to screening and multidisciplinary collaboration for managing ILD in patients who receive T-DXd.
Data from the REVEAL study affirm elevated white blood cell counts and higher variant allele frequency as risk factors for progression in polycythemia vera.
Additional analyses of patient-reported outcomes and MRD status in the QuANTUM-First trial are also ongoing, says Harry P. Erba, MD, PhD.
Related Content