T-DXd Yields Consistent Results in HER2-Low Advanced Breast Cancer

News
Article

Results from an updated analysis of the DESTINY-Breast04 trial indicate an efficacy improvement when trastuzumab deruxtecan monotherapy is used for patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer.

Results from an updated analysis of the DESTINY-Breast04 trial indicate an efficacy improvement when trastuzumab deruxtecan monotherapy is used for patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer.

Results from an updated analysis of the DESTINY-Breast04 trial indicate an efficacy improvement when trastuzumab deruxtecan monotherapy is used for patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer.

Fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki (T-DXd; Enhertu) demonstrated a clinically meaningful, sustained improvement in outcomes compared with physician’s choice of treatment in patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer regardless of hormone receptor status, according to results from the 32-month follow-up of the phase 3 DESTINY-Breast04 trial (NCT03734029) presented at the 2023 European Society of Medical Oncology Congress (ESMO).1

For all patients, the median overall survival (OS) at the primary analysis2 was 23.4 months (95% CI, 20.0-24.8) in the T-DXd arm and 16.8 months (95% CI, 14.5-20.0) in the physician’s choice arm (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.49-0.84). At the updated analysis, OS was 22.9 months (95% CI, 21.2-24.5) vs 16.8 months (95% CI, 14.1-19.5) between both arms, respectively (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55-0.86).

At 24 months, the OS rate in the T-DXd arm was 47.3% (95% CI, 41.9%-52.4%) vs 32.0% (95% CI, 24.5%-39.3%) in the physician’s choice arm. At 36 months, the OS rate between both arms was 26.2% (95% CI, 20.6%-31.9%) and 16.3% (95% CI, 10.3%-23.6%), respectively.

“These results [from the longer follow-up of DESTINY-Breat04] continue to support the use of T-DXd as the new standard of care after 1 line of chemotherapy in patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer,” presenting author Shanu Modi, MD, an attending physician at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, stated during the conference.

Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive either T-DXd (n = 373) at 5.4 mg/kg every 3 weeks or physician’s choice therapy with capecitabine, eribulin (Halaven), gemcitabine, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane; n = 184). To be enrolled, patients needed to have HER2-low disease, defined by an immunohistochemistry of 1+ or 2+. Patients must also have had unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer and been previously treated with 1 to 2 lines of prior therapy in the metastatic setting. Patients with hormone receptor-positive disease needed to be considered endocrine refractory.

The updated data cutoff was March 1, 2023, and the median follow-up was 32.0 months (95% CI, 31.0-32.8).

For patients who were hormone receptor positive, the median OS at the primary analysis was 23.9 months (95% CI, 20.8-24.8) in the T-DXd arm (n = 331) vs 17.5 months (95% CI, 15.2-22.4) in the physician’s choice arm (n = 163; HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.48-0.88), and at the updated analysis, median OS was 23.9 months (95% CI, 21.7-25.2) vs 17.6 months (95% CI, 15.1-20.2; HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55-0.87). The 24-month OS rates were 49.0% (95% CI, 43.3%-54.5%) in the T-DXd arm and 35.1% (95% CI, 27.3%-43.0%) in the physicians’ choice arm.

Modi noted that findings were consistent with previously reported results that were seen in the primary analysis, of which there was a 31% reduction in the risk of death for patients being treated with T-DXd vs physician's choice chemotherapy.2

The median progression-free survival (PFS) in all patients of the primary analysis was 8.8 months (95% CI, 8.3-9.8) in the T-DXd arm vs 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.0-4.5) in the physician’s choice arm (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.30-0.45). In the updated analysis, the median PFS was 8.8 months (95% CI, 8.3-9.8) in the T-DXd arm and 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.0-4.5) in the physician’s choice arm (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.29-0.45). At 24 months, the PFS rate in the T-DXd arm was 14.5% (95% CI, 10.8%-18.7%).

For patients with hormone receptor-positive disease in the primary analysis, the median PFS in the T-DXd arm was 9.6 months (95% CI, 8.4-10.0) vs 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.4-4.9) in the physician’s choice arm (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.30-0.47). The updated analysis showed a median PFS of 9.6 months (95% CI, 8.4-10.0) in the T-DXd arm vs 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.4-4.9) in the physician’s choice arm (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.30-0.46). The 24-month PFS rate was 15.4% (95% CI, 11.3%-20.0%) with T-DXd.

An exploratory analysis assessed patients with hormone receptor-negative disease. OS in the primary analysis was 18.2 months (95% CI, 13.6-not evaluable) with T-DXd compared with 8.3 months (95% CI, 5.6-20.6) in the physician's choice arm (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.24-0.95). The updated analysis showed an OS of 17.1 months (95% CI, 13.6-23.0) compared with 8.3 months (95% CI, 5.6-20.4) between both arms, respectively (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.31-1.08).

The 24-month OS rates were 22.4% (95% CI, 18.5%-47.5%) in the T-DXd arm compared with 11.8% (95% CI, 2.0%-31.2%) in the physician's choice arm.

The median PFS in the primary analysis by blinded independent central review was 8.5 months (95% CI, 4.3-11.7) in the T-DXd arm vs 2.9 months (95% CI, 1.4-5.1) in the physician’s choice arm (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24-0.89). The updated analysis by investigator review highlighted a median PFS of 6.3 months (95% CI, 4.2-8.5) in the T-DXd arm and 2.9 months (95% CI, 1.4-4.2) in the physician’s choice arm (HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.15-0.57).

Modi noted that there was a 42% reduction in the risk of death and a 71% reduction in disease progression in this hormone receptor-negative population receiving T-DXd.

In all patients, the PFS2 was 15.4 months (95% CI, 13.6-16.5) in the T-DXd arm vs 9.7 months (95% CI, 8.3-10.8) in the physician’s choice arm (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.41-0.64). In the hormone receptor-positive cohort, the median PFS2 was 15.5 months (95% CI, 13.8-17.2) in the T-DXd arm and 10.5 months (95% CI, 8.3-11.4) in the physician’s choice arm (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.40-0.64).

Treatment-emergent adverse effects (TEAEs) of grade 3 or higher occurred in 54.4% of patients in the T-DXd arm and 67.4% in the physician’s choice arm, with serious TEAEs occurring in 29.1% vs 25.6%. Due to TEAEs, treatment discontinuation was reported in 16.7% vs 8.1%, dose interruptions in 41.8% vs 42.4%, dose reductions in 24.0% vs 37.8%, and deaths in 4.0% vs 2.9% of the T-DXd and physician’s choice arms, respectively. Deaths that occurred while on treatment were reported in 3.8% vs 4.7%.

The most common drug-related TEAEs that were grade 3 or higher in the T-DXd arm were neutropenia (14%), anemia (9%), and fatigue (8%). For those on the physician’s choice arm, the most common were neutropenia (42%), leukopenia (19%), and transaminases increase (11%).

References

  1. Modi S, Jacot W, Iwata H, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) versus treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) in patients with HER2-low unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer: updated survival results of the randomized, phase 3 DESTINY-Breast04 study. Presented at the 2023 European Society of Medical Oncology Congress, October 20-24, 2023. Madrid, Spain. Abstract 376O.
  2. Modi S, Jacot W, Yamashita T, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-low advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(1):9-20. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2203690

Related Videos
Collaboration among nurses, social workers, and others may help in safely administering outpatient bispecific T-cell engager therapy to patients.
Nurses should be educated on cranial nerve impairment that may affect those with multiple myeloma who receive cilta-cel, says Leslie Bennett, MSN, RN.
Treatment with cilta-cel may give patients with multiple myeloma “more time,” according to Ishmael Applewhite, BSN, RN-BC, OCN.
Nurses may need to help patients with multiple myeloma adjust to walking differently in the event of peripheral neuropathy following cilta-cel.
Tailoring neoadjuvant therapy regimens for patients with mismatch repair deficient gastroesophageal cancer represents a future step in terms of research.
Not much is currently known about the factors that may predict pathologic responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this population, says Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD.
Data highlight that patients who are in Black and poor majority areas are less likely to receive liver ablation or colorectal liver metastasis in surgical cancer care.
Findings highlight how systemic issues may impact disparities in outcomes following surgery for patients with cancer, according to Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery may allow practices to de-escalate subsequent radiotherapy, says Barbara Smith, MD, PhD.
Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD, discussed ways to improve treatment and surgical outcomes for patients with dMMR gastroesophageal cancer.