Visits to oncologists up, but profit per patient is on the decline

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 17 No 10
Volume 17
Issue 10

SAN FRANCISCO-New patient visits to oncologists increased by 22% over the past 3 years; however, oncologists’ average profit per patient fell by 91%. These were among the key findings of Onmark’s 2008 “Office-Based Oncology Benchmarking Survey,” which measures m operational and financial benchmarks among community-based oncology practices.

ABSTRACT: Data also suggest a shift in revenue from Medicare fee-for-service to Medicare Advantage plans.

SAN FRANCISCO-New patient visits to oncologists increased by 22% over the past 3 years; however, oncologists’ average profit per patient fell by 91%. These were among the key findings of Onmark’s 2008 “Office-Based Oncology Benchmarking Survey,” which measures m operational and financial benchmarks among community-based oncology practices.

Survey results indicated that between 2005 and 2007, the average number of oncologists per practice increased by 48% (from 2.9 to 4.3). Meanwhile, there was a 22% increase in the average number of new patient visits per oncologist (from 300 to 388) and a 29% increase in the average number of established patient visits (from 3,481 to 5,139).

Revenue per oncologist per patient varied over the survey years, averaging $4,464 in 2005, $5,250 in 2006, and $4,082 in 2007. However, the average profit per oncologist per patient decreased steadily, from $937 to $654 to $89-amounting to a 91% drop over the 3-year period.

Survey results also indicated that the percentage of oncologists’ total payor revenue accounted for by Medicare Advantage plans rose from 2% to 20% over the 3-year period, while the percentage collected from traditional Medicare fee-for-service programs fell by 16%. Drug costs accounted for 61% of a practice’s budget in 2005 but 79% in 2007; the percentage made up by costs for “other” items fell from 26% to 6%.

“In 2005, the entire industry had to come to terms with a significant decrease in the reimbursement for drugs administered in oncology clinics,” said Onmark vice president and general manager Mike Cunningham, PharmD, in a press statement. “This change required oncologists to adjust the way they traditionally conducted business and re-evaluate what financial success meant. As our survey shows, even 3 years later, we are still seeing the effects these changes have had on the industry.”

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Future findings from a translational analysis of the OVATION-2 trial may corroborate prior clinical data with IMNN-001 in advanced ovarian cancer.
The dual high-affinity binding observed with ISB 2001 may avoid resistance mechanisms reported with other BCMA-targeted therapies.
The use of chemotherapy trended towards improved recurrence-free intervals in older patients with high-risk tumors as determined via the MammaPrint assay.
Use of a pharmacist-directed resource appears to improve provider confidence and adverse effect monitoring for patients undergoing infusion therapy.
Reshma L. Mahtani, DO, describes how updates from the DESTINY-Breast09, ASCENT-04, and VERITAC-2 trials may shift practices in the breast cancer field.