Panelists discuss how understanding the distinctions between HER2 overexpression and mutations in NSCLC influences patient care strategies and prognosis, alongside the challenges of biomarker testing methods such as IHC and NGS.
Can you provide an overview of different HER2 alterations in NSCLC? What are the key differences between HER2 overexpression and HER2 mutations in NSCLC, in terms of biology and how we detect them? How do these distinctions impact our approach to patient care?
How do prognoses and survival outcomes differ for patients with HER2-overexpressing NSCLC vs those with HER2-mutated NSCLC?
Can you walk us through your biomarker testing practices in NSCLC, particularly for identifying HER2 overexpression vs HER2 mutations? What are the challenges and considerations specific to each testing approach in NSCLC (IHC vs NGS testing)?
How do you balance the need for comprehensive biomarker testing with the limitations of tissue availability?
A prospective, multicenter study found that a blood-based miRNA assay combined with CA19-9 improved early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
The FDA granted platform technology designation to the immunotherapeutic platform for use in HPV-positive cancers such as head and neck, cervical, and anal.
The updated NCCN Guidelines for myeloproliferative neoplasms recommend rusfertide as a category 1 option across both low- and high-risk polycythemia vera.
As part of the ANDA pathway, Bravnetsa is the only radiopharmaceutical the FDA has determined to be bioequivalent and therapeutically equivalent to the reference product, Lutathera.
Xiuning Le, MD, PhD, explains how oncologists should approach HER2 biomarker testing following sevabertinib’s frontline approval in non–small cell lung cancer.