Anti-VEGF Agent Active Against Kaposi’s Sarcoma

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 8 No 12
Volume 8
Issue 12

SAN FRANCISCO-Because Kaposi’s sarcoma is a highly vascular tumor, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) may be a possible regulator for the edema and angiogenesis often seen in the disease, Parkash Gill, MD, of the Norris Cancer Center, University of Southern California, said at the 39th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC).

SAN FRANCISCO—Because Kaposi’s sarcoma is a highly vascular tumor, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) may be a possible regulator for the edema and angiogenesis often seen in the disease, Parkash Gill, MD, of the Norris Cancer Center, University of Southern California, said at the 39th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC).

In this onging study, investigators are administered SU5416, a drug designed to interrupt VEGF-mediated signaling and decrease VEGF-stimulated phosphorylation. Patients with cutaneous AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma that was stable or progressive under their current therapy receive escalating doses of SU5416 intravenously twice weekly. Patients begin with a dose of 65 mg/m², increasing to a maximum dose of 145 mg/m². The treatment is given in a cycle of 29 days, with a maximum of four cycles of therapy.

Patients are evaluated for antitumor response, plasma levels of SU5416 and its metabolites, protease inhibitor levels, viral load, and, especially, CD4 cell counts. Investigators also assess lesion size and extent of edema at 4-week intervals. Patients are maintained on stable anti-retroviral therapy.

Dr. Gill reported on 20 patients, all male, with a median age of 36 and median CD4 cell count of 272 cells/mm³. All but one patient had previously received protease inhibitors as part of their anti-HIV regimen. Nine patients had tumor-associated edema.

Five patients had a biologic response that included flattening and reduction of lesions and reduction of edema. Three patients had more than a 50% reduction in their tumor burden but did not sustain this for more than 4 weeks. Several patients showing a response reported increased mobility and a reduction in pain.

The one patient who had not received prior treatment with protease inhibitors showed a rapid response to therapy 4 weeks after treatment began, resulting in a complete flattening of lesions.

“For the most part, there was no impact on CD4 counts,” Dr. Gill said, “with rare cases showing a decline or increase in the numbers.” Similarly, there was no impact on HIV viral load.

The doses were well tolerated, although two patients discontinued therapy because of local toxicity at the site of dose injection. Headache, nausea, and vomiting were reported as the primary adverse effects at higher doses. These side effects decreased with continued therapy or supportive care. No dose-limiting drug toxicity was reported. “SU5416 is well tolerated and will be used in future trials,” Dr. Gill said.

Related Videos
The difference in adverse effect profiles between sorafenib and nirogacestat may make one treatment more appealing than the other for certain patients with desmoid tumors, says Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
The August CancerNetwork Snap Recap takes a look back at key FDA news updates, as well as expert perspectives on the chemotherapy shortage.
Future developments in the sarcoma space may also involve research on circulating tumor DNA and metabolic therapies, according to Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
Current research in the sarcoma space includes the development of treatment options such as T-cell therapies, and combinations such as TKIs/immunotherapy, according to Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD, states that sitravatinib appears to be active and well tolerated among patients with dedifferentiated or well-differentiated liposarcoma.
Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD, also discusses how the treatment of desmoid tumors has evolved following data supporting the use of sorafenib in this population.
CAR T-cell therapies and immunotherapy agents may offer up new options and even become standard of care in certain sarcoma subtypes.
There are several novel treatments that may be beneficial in several sarcoma subtypes including CAR T-cell therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors, according to Sandra P. D’Angelo, MD.
Data from a ctDNA analysis of the phase 3 INTRIGUE study indicate that KIT mutational status may be associated with response to certain Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in GIST, according to an expert from the Yale Cancer Center in New Haven, Massachusetts.