Biweekly TAS-102 Reduces Toxicity, Maintains Survival in Metastatic CRC

Fact checked by Russ Conroy
News
Article

A retrospective analysis shows that trifluridine/tipiracil with or without bevacizumab given biweekly was favorable in those with colorectal cancer.

A retrospective analysis shows that trifluridine/tipiracil with or without bevacizumab given biweekly was favorable in those with colorectal cancer.

A retrospective analysis shows that trifluridine/tipiracil with or without bevacizumab given biweekly was favorable in those with colorectal cancer.

Biweekly dosing of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) reduced myelosuppression while maintaining survival outcomes with an improved toxicity profile in patients with refractory unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), according to results from a retrospective analysis published in The Oncologist.1

The median overall survival (OS) of all patients who received TAS-102 at the biweekly dosing schedule was 9.2 months (95% CI, 6.5-12.1); the 1-year survival rate was 32.8% (95% CI, 21.4%-50.1%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.5-6.5).

Those who received TAS-102 in combination with bevacizumab (Avastin) experienced a median OS of 9.2 months (95% CI, 6.4-12.1) vs 8.8 months (95% CI, 5.4-not available [NA]) with TAS-102 monotherapy. The median PFS was 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.7-6.5) vs 3.2 months (95% CI, 2.3-8.2).

In the historical phase 3 RECOURSE trial (NCT01607957), the median OS and PFS with TAS-102 monotherapy were 7.1 months (95% CI, 6.5-7.8), with a 1-year survival rate of 27%, and 2 months (95% CI, 1.9-2.1), respectively.2 In the phase 3 SUNLIGHT trial (NCT04737187), the median OS and PFS were 7.5 months (95% CI, 6.3-8.6) and 2.4 months (95% CI, 2.1-3.2), respectively, with TAS-102 monotherapy; with TAS-102 plus bevacizumab, they were 10.8 months (95% CI, 9.4-11.8) and 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.5-5.9), respectively.3

“We’ve seen that this typical dosing schedule frequently causes significant bone marrow suppression, and patients often require dose reductions or treatment delays to recover. In other cases, patients have to use a medication called G-CSF, which helps to increase white blood cell counts,” stated lead study author Christopher G. Cann, MD, assistant professor in the Department of Hematology/Oncology at Fox Chase Cancer Center, in a press release.4 “Use of this medication, however, can also cause [adverse] effects such as bone pain and other more serious complications.”

The analysis included a total of 61 patients with refractory metastatic CRC and appendiceal cancer who completed more than 12 days of TAS-102 therapy and underwent imaging every 8 to 12 weeks. The dosing regimen consisted of oral TAS-102 at 35 mg/m2, capped at 80 mg per dose, twice a day on days 1 to 5 and 15 to 19 of a 28-day cycle.

The median age of patients was 56.5 years (range, 30-80), the male-to-female patient ratio was 1.38:1, and 79% of patients had an ECOG performance status of 1. The median number of lines of prior therapy was 3.

Regarding adverse events (AEs), any-grade neutropenia was observed in 26.3% of patients who received TAS-102 monotherapy and 45.2% who received the combination; neutropenia of grade 3 or higher occurred in 15.8% and 16.7%. Any-grade anemia occurred in 52.6% vs 38.1%, respectively, and grade 3 or higher anemia occurred in 10.5% vs 7.1%. Any-grade thrombocytopenia occurred in 0% and 26.1%, and grade 3 or higher thrombocytopenia occurred in 0% and 2.4%.

In RECOURSE, neutropenia of any grade and grade 3 or higher occurred in 67% and 38% of those who received TAS-102 alone; in SUNLIGHT, it occurred in 51.2% and 32.1% with TAS-102 monotherapy and 62.2% and 43.1% with TAS-102 plus bevacizumab.

In RECOURSE, anemia of any grade and grade 3 or higher occurred in 77% and 18% of those who received TAS-102 alone; in SUNLIGHT, it occurred in 31.7% and 11.0% with TAS-102 monotherapy and 28.9% and 6.1% with TAS-102 plus bevacizumab.

In RECOURSE, thrombocytopenia of any grade and grade 3 or higher occurred in 42% and 5% of those who received TAS-102 alone; in SUNLIGHT, it occurred in 11.4% and 1.2% with TAS-102 monotherapy and 17.1% and 2.8% with TAS-102 plus bevacizumab.

“This retrospective analysis demonstrates a complementary dosing schedule of TAS-102 that results in similar therapeutic efficacy while reducing treatment-related toxicities in this palliative treatment setting,” wrote Cann and coauthors in the study.1 “Additional prospective, multicenter data [are] needed to validate our findings.”

References

  1. Cann C, LaPelusa M, Cimino S, et al. Biweekly dosing of trifluridine-tipiracil reduces rates of myelosuppression while maintaining efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncologist. 2025;30(5):oyaf099. doi:10.1093/oncolo/oyaf099
  2. Mayer RJ, Van Cutsem E, Falcone A, et al. Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(20):1909-1919. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1414325
  3. Prager GW, Taieb J, Fakih M, et al. Trifluridine-tipiracil and bevacizumab in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(18):1657-1667. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2214963
  4. Fox Chase Cancer Center researcher shows biweekly dose of TAS-102 reduces toxicity and remains effective for treatment of colorectal cancer. News release. Fox Chase Cancer Center. June 5, 2025. Accessed June 16, 2026. https://tinyurl.com/4e4tznwc

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Treatment with KRAS inhibitors may help mitigate a common driver of genetic alteration across a majority of pancreatic cancers.
Updated results from the BREAKWATER study seemed to be most impactful to the CRC space, according to Michael J. Pishvaian, MD, PhD.
Future research will aim to assess the efficacy of PIPAC-MMC plus systemic therapy vs systemic therapy alone in patients with peritoneal tumors.
Although small incision surgery may serve as a conduit to deliver PIPAC-MMC, it may confer benefits in the staging and treatment of peritoneal tumors.
Patients with peritoneal metastases were historically associated with limited survival and low consideration for clinical trials.
Combining sotorasib with panitumumab may reduce the burden of disease in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer.
Findings from the CodeBreak 300 study have cemented sotorasib/panitumumab as a third-line treatment option for KRAS G12C-mutated colorectal cancer.
Sotorasib plus panitumumab may offer improved survival compared with previously approved treatment options in KRAS G12C-mutated colorectal cancer.
Additional local, regional, or national policy may bolster access to screening for colorectal cancer, according to Aasma Shaukat, MD, MPH.
Related Content