RTOG 94-13 is a phase III study designed to determine the appropriatetreatment volume and the optimal way to combine radiation and
RTOG 94-13 is a phase III study designed to determine the appropriatetreatment volume and the optimal way to combine radiation andtotal androgen suppression for prostate cancer patients who areat greater risk of local/systemic failure.
Patients who have localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate andhave an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level are eligiblefor the trial, reports Mack Roach, MD, chair of the study. Theaccrual goal is 1,200 patients.
Patients are being randomized to one of four arms:
In both arms 3 and 4, flutamide and goserelin are being givenfor 4 months once radiation therapy is completed.
"This study allows us to answer the critical question ofwhether whole pelvis irradiation plus a boost improves the progressionfree-survival of these patients," says Dr. Roach.
"It also allows us to test the hypothesis that flutamideand Zoladex are more effective if they are administered beforeand during radiation therapy rather than after radiation treatments,"he adds.
Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.
Prolaris in Practice: Guiding ADT Benefits, Clinical Application, and Expert Insights From ACRO 2025
April 15th 2025Steven E. Finkelstein, MD, DABR, FACRO discuses how Prolaris distinguishes itself from other genomic biomarker platforms by providing uniquely actionable clinical information that quantifies the absolute benefit of androgen deprivation therapy when added to radiation therapy, offering clinicians a more precise tool for personalizing prostate cancer treatment strategies.
CCR Scores and Beyond: Precision Strategies for Treatment Intensification in Prostate Cancer
April 15th 2025Alvaro Martinez, MD discusses how emerging genomic risk stratification tools such as the clinical cell-cycle risk (CCR) score are transforming personalized prostate cancer treatment by enabling more nuanced assessments of metastasis risk and treatment intensification strategies beyond traditional NCCN risk groupings.