EMR Flags Can Improve Care in Immunotherapy-Treated Patients

Article

Electronic medical record and telephone triage systems should be updated to reflect the unique risks of immune-related side effects faced by patients undergoing cancer immunotherapies.

Electronic medical record (EMR) and telephone triage systems should be updated to reflect the unique risks of immune-related side effects faced by patients undergoing cancer immunotherapies, according to a speaker at the Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) 42nd Annual Congress, held May 4–7 in Denver.

Cancer immunotherapy is quickly becoming the “fourth pillar” of clinical oncology, joining surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, said Monica Fradkin, RN, BSN, MPH, OCN, of the Smilow Cancer Hospital in New Haven, Connecticut.

But it presents new patient management challenges that are unfamiliar to many cancer care providers.

“The rapid approval of agents is moving immunotherapy into a variety of clinical settings,” she said. “But immunotherapy is associated with a series of different potentially life-threatening immune-related adverse events, including severe dermatitis, enterocolitis, hepatitis, endocrinopathy, and neurologic and ocular effects.”

There is wide variation in how these immune-related adverse events are managed within and between facilities, and knowledge gaps about the risks and management of these side effects are common among oncology nurses and non-oncology healthcare providers, she said. Even EMRs have yet to catch up to immunotherapy with appropriate supporting documentation fields.

Particularly when patients receive care from non-oncology providers, early signs of immunotherapy-associated adverse events can be missed.

In May 2016, Fradkin and colleagues met to plan an initiative to improve technological support for the care of patients undergoing cancer immunotherapy, in order to improve patient safety at other sites of care.

The workgroup revised Epic and EMR flowsheets, and created smart texts and documentation and handoff communications tools to facilitate coordinated cross-disciplinary management of patients receiving immunotherapy. Among the changes to Epic EMRs was to send alerts to non-oncology healthcare locations caring for these patients: “This patient is receiving an anti-cancer immune therapy. Please contact the patient’s oncologist regarding an acute event to discuss management.”

They also revised existing chemo- and radiotherapy-centered telephone triage guidelines to include immunotherapy-related adverse events.

“These were questions that made perfect sense around chemotherapy, but when it came to immunotherapy, we weren’t asking the right questions,” Fradkin said. Questions were added on cramping and on blood or mucus in the stool, to help determine if a patient should be seen urgently.

Cross-discipline cooperation is key to effectively detecting and addressing immunotherapy-associated side effects, but such initiatives are inherently multidimensional and complex, she cautioned.

“Issues are interlocked; one change affects many other moving parts,” she explained. “The fast pace of drug development impacts the care provided and technology necessary to care for our patients. Changes are coming fast and furious now.”

Related Videos
Tailoring neoadjuvant therapy regimens for patients with mismatch repair deficient gastroesophageal cancer represents a future step in terms of research.
Not much is currently known about the factors that may predict pathologic responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this population, says Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD.
Data highlight that patients who are in Black and poor majority areas are less likely to receive liver ablation or colorectal liver metastasis in surgical cancer care.
Findings highlight how systemic issues may impact disparities in outcomes following surgery for patients with cancer, according to Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery may allow practices to de-escalate subsequent radiotherapy, says Barbara Smith, MD, PhD.
Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD, discussed ways to improve treatment and surgical outcomes for patients with dMMR gastroesophageal cancer.
Barbara Smith, MD, PhD, spoke about the potential use of pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery based on reports from the phase 3 INSITE trial.
Patient-reported symptoms following surgery appear to improve with the use of perioperative telemonitoring, says Kelly M. Mahuron, MD.
Treatment options in the refractory setting must improve for patients with resected colorectal cancer peritoneal metastasis, says Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Although immature, overall survival data from the KEYNOTE-868 trial may support the use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with endometrial cancer.
Related Content