Global lung ca staging lexicon undergoes major overhaul

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 18 No 5
Volume 18
Issue 5

The imminent publication of eagerly anticipated new international guidelines promises to transform the complex area of lung cancer staging. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer is expected to publish its updated recommendations in 2009. The seventh edition of the guidelines will include tumor, node, and metastasis classification. The original TNM staging of lung cancer proposed in 1973 was based on 2,155 cases from the database of Clifton Mountain, MD, from M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

ABSTRACT: New international guidelines offer substantial changes for T and M staging; N stage maintained.

The imminent publication of eagerly anticipated new international guidelines promises to transform the complex area of lung cancer staging. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer is expected to publish its updated recommendations in 2009. The seventh edition of the guidelines will include tumor, node, and metastasis classification. The original TNM staging of lung cancer proposed in 1973 was based on 2,155 cases from the database of Clifton Mountain, MD, from M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston. By 1997, this database had grown to 5,319 cases, and it long remained the primary basis for the classification of malignant tumors. But then the IASLC got involved, eventually resulting in a huge new database of more than 81,000 cases obtained between 1990 and 2000.

The authors of the seventh edition have made substantial changes for T and M staging, but they have left N staging unchanged. For T staging, they have introduced new size stratifications, as well as reassignment of several invasion criteria. For M staging, they have formulated a subclassification for M1a and M1b metastases.

The new recommendations look set to be accepted as a guide for estimating patient prognosis. They will form the basis for treatment decisions in practice, according to Antoine Micheau, MD, from the department of thoracic and cardiovascular radiology at the Arnaud de Villeneuve University Hospital in Montpellier. Extensive corrections have been made to remove many deficiencies of the old staging system, he said.

The sixth edition from 2002 contained many controversial aspects. For instance, a satellite tumor nodule in the primary lobe was defined as T4, but some experts suggested that it might behave more favorably than in patients with another subgroup of T4. As a result, distinguishing the prognosis of patients with stage IIIa and IIIb was sometimes unclear.

“The proposed changes will improve the alignment of TNM stage with prognosis and treatment,” Dr. Micheau said.

Related Videos
UPCOMING SERIES
Related Content