
Oncology NEWS International
- Oncology NEWS International Vol 10 No 1
- Volume 10
- Issue 1
ODAC Rejects Histamine as Adjuvant Therapy for Melanoma
BETHESDA, Md-The FDA’s Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) declined in a unanimous vote to recommend that the agency approve histamine hydrochloride injections (Maxim Pharmaceuticals) for adjuvant use with interleukin-2 (IL-2) in the treatment of adult patients with advanced melanoma that has metastasized to the liver.
BETHESDA, MdThe FDA’s Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) declined in a unanimous vote to recommend that the agency approve histamine hydrochloride injections (Maxim Pharmaceuticals) for adjuvant use with interleukin-2 (IL-2) in the treatment of adult patients with advanced melanoma that has metastasized to the liver.
Maxim sought approval based on a subgroup of 129 patients enrolled in a 305-patient randomized, multicenter, open-label study designed to show the benefit to metastatic melanoma patents of adding histamine to IL-2 therapy. The rationale for the study was that monocytes and macrophages inhibit the IL-2-induced activation of lymphocyte functions, and that histamine can restore the responsiveness of natural-killer cells and T cells to IL-2.
Patients received either IL-2 alone or with histamine. According to the FDA analysis of the trial, median survival among all study participants was 8.0 months in the IL-2 group and 8.9 in the combination arm, a difference that was not statistically significant.
Among patients whose melanoma had metastasized to the liver, however, median survival was statistically significant: 5.0 months in the IL-2 treatment arm and 9.2 among patients receiving both IL-2 and histamine, according to the company’s analysis.
FDA medical reviewer Judy Chiao, MD, challenged several aspects of the study protocol and changes that were made to it during the course of the conduct of the study. Dr. Chiao and a number of ODAC members also expressed concerns about some safety data that emerged in both FDA’s and the company’s analyses of the study.
According to the FDA, "There were many imbalances in known prognostic factors and other patient characteristics between the two treatment arms in the subgroup of patients with liver metastases, perhaps because there was no stratified randomization. These included performance status, albumin, disease-free interval, and the number of metastatic sites. When the data are adjusted for imbalances, the result becomes less favorable, losing statistical significance."
Articles in this issue
almost 25 years ago
ODAC Recommends Campath for FDA Approval for Refractory CLLalmost 25 years ago
‘IrinoGem’ Active and Well Tolerated in Pancreatic Canceralmost 25 years ago
STI571 Studies Help Validate Molecular Targeting in CMLalmost 25 years ago
Outpatient Mylotarg Therapy Cuts Costs in Relapsed AMLalmost 25 years ago
STI571 Proves Effective in Patients With Interferon-Failure CMLalmost 25 years ago
Prostate Cancer Patients Tolerate Higher 3D Conformal RT Dosesalmost 25 years ago
IP6 (Phytic Acid) Inhibits Breast Cancer in Animalsalmost 25 years ago
Adjuvant Therapy Beneficial in Early, Node-Negative Breast Canceralmost 25 years ago
Medicare Increases Payment Rates for Most Physiciansalmost 25 years ago
Update on High-Dose Consolidation Therapy in Breast CancerNewsletter
Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.


















































































