(P017) Long-Term Biochemical Progression-Free Survival and Quality-of-Life Outcomes in a Single-Institution Cohort of Prostate Cancer Patients Treated by Real-Time Inversely Optimized Prostate Seed Implantation

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 30 No 4_Suppl_1
Volume 30
Issue 4_Suppl_1

Overall, inversely optimized low-dose-rate prostate seed implantation, resulting in reduced needle and source exposure, demonstrates excellent, durable biochemical progression–free survival with modest grade 2 GU and very low GI toxicity in selected low-risk and favorable intermediate-risk patients.

Eric Kemmerer, MD, Abhirup Sarkar, MS, James Martelli-Raben, Tate Muratori-Levit, Hungcheng Chen, MS, Firas Mourtada, PhD, Adam Raben, MD; Department of Radiation Oncology, Drexel University; Department of Radiation Oncology, Christiana Care

PURPOSE: Inversely optimized low-dose-rate prostate seed implantation (IO-PSI) has been shown to offer excellent biochemical progression–free survival (bPFS), with a favorable toxicity profile. Here, we report 9-year outcomes in patients with low-risk or intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer and examine for correlates of biochemical control and genitourinary quality-of-life (GU-QOL) outcomes.

METHODS: From 2003–2015, a total of 492 patients were identified who had received real-time IO-PSI as definitive treatment for prostate cancer, 353 with at least 2 years of follow-up. The median pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level was 5.1; median dose was 145 Gy (96% via 125I); 91% were T1c; and 74%, 21%, and 4% had low-risk, favorable IR, and unfavorable IR disease, respectively. Seven percent received short-term androgen deprivation (SAD). Four patients had high-risk prostate cancer and were excluded from the survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank testing) for n = 349 patients. Cox proportional hazards and multivariable regression were performed to examine the relationship of clinical and dosimetric variables with bPFS and GU-QOL. ANOVA (analysis of variance) was used to compare dosimetry by risk group (P < .05).

RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 40 months, the overall 9-year bPFS was 92%, with 95%, 83%, and 75% in the low-risk, favorable IR, and unfavorable IR groups, respectively (P = .0002). Outcomes for men with Gleason 3/4 and 4/3 bPFS did not differ (P = .92). No significant difference in dosimetry among risk groups was observed. On Cox proportional hazards analysis, only risk group correlated with bPFS (P = .001). On multivariable analysis, postimplant V150% correlated with GU-QOL score (P = .0009). Crude incidences of grade ≥ 2 GU and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were 25% and 1%, respectively. No benefit to SAD was observed.

CONCLUSION: Overall, IO-PSI, resulting in reduced needle and source exposure, demonstrates excellent, durable bPFS with modest grade 2 GU and very low GI toxicity in selected low-risk and favorable IR patients. Unfavorable IR outcomes warrant further investigation of dose-escalation strategies. Risk group and postimplant V150% correlate with bPFS and postimplant GU-QOL score, respectively.

Proceedings of the 98th Annual Meeting of the American Radium Society - americanradiumsociety.org

Articles in this issue

(S002) A 15-Year Review of Radiation Therapy for Keloids at Two Institutions
(S003) Single-Fraction Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma Bony Metastases Provides Pain Control and Decreases Time to Chemotherapy
(S001) Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Serum Inflammatory Markers in Patients Receiving Radiation Therapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer
(S004) Trend in Second Malignancy Risk for Head and Neck Cancer With Increased Utilization of IMRT: Analysis of SEER Database
(S005) Comparison of Legal Needs of a Group of Patients With Cancer: Economic and Geographic Factors
(S006) Mission Improvement: Lessons From Initiating a Resident-Led Quality Improvement Project on Smoking Cessation at a County Hospital
(S007) Results of a Phase II Trial Using Cetuximab Plus Docetaxel With Low-Dose Fractionated Radiation for Recurrent Unresectable Locally Advanced Head and Neck Carcinoma
(S008) The Effect of Simulation and Treatment Delays for Patients With Oropharyngeal Cancer Receiving Definitive Radiation Therapy in the Era of Risk Stratification Using Smoking and Human Papilloma Virus Status
(S009) Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Boost for Unfavorable Prostate Cancer: A Report on Three-Year Toxicity
(S011) Comparative Study Between Ileal Conduit and Indiana Pouch After Cystectomy for Patients With Carcinoma of Urinary Bladder
(S010) Computed Tomography–Assessed Measures of Bone Mineral Density and Muscle Mass as Predictors of Survival in Men With Prostate Cancer
(S012) Quantitative Imaging to Evaluate the Malignant Potential of Pancreatic Cysts
(S013) Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Concurrent Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
(S014) The Impact of Radiation Therapy on Survival in Surgically Resected, High-Risk Patients With Ampullary Adenocarcinoma: A Population-Based Analysis
(S016) The Impact of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy on Overall Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
Related Videos
Tailoring neoadjuvant therapy regimens for patients with mismatch repair deficient gastroesophageal cancer represents a future step in terms of research.
Not much is currently known about the factors that may predict pathologic responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this population, says Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD.
Data highlight that patients who are in Black and poor majority areas are less likely to receive liver ablation or colorectal liver metastasis in surgical cancer care.
Findings highlight how systemic issues may impact disparities in outcomes following surgery for patients with cancer, according to Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery may allow practices to de-escalate subsequent radiotherapy, says Barbara Smith, MD, PhD.
Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD, discussed ways to improve treatment and surgical outcomes for patients with dMMR gastroesophageal cancer.
Barbara Smith, MD, PhD, spoke about the potential use of pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery based on reports from the phase 3 INSITE trial.
Patient-reported symptoms following surgery appear to improve with the use of perioperative telemonitoring, says Kelly M. Mahuron, MD.
Treatment options in the refractory setting must improve for patients with resected colorectal cancer peritoneal metastasis, says Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Although immature, overall survival data from the KEYNOTE-868 trial may support the use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with endometrial cancer.
Related Content