
Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Case-Based Discussion — The Comorbid, Higher-Risk Patient, and Program Conclusions
Dr. Thomas Martin presents the final and most challenging case: an older patient being evaluated for BCMA-directed therapy after progression on prior anti-CD38 therapy, with baseline neuropathy, mild gait instability, recurrent infections, and significant caregiver concern about neurologic toxicity, infection, and logistics.
Episodes in this series

Dr. Thomas Martin presents the final and most challenging case: an older patient being evaluated for BCMA-directed therapy after progression on prior anti-CD38 therapy, with baseline neuropathy, mild gait instability, recurrent infections, and significant caregiver concern about neurologic toxicity, infection, and logistics. Team Myeloma Masters favors a lower-intensity, potentially fixed-duration bispecific approach with dose attenuation and less frequent dosing to mitigate risk in a frail patient, while the panel stresses that IVIG alone does not address the full infection risk and that a more comprehensive antimicrobial prophylaxis strategy is warranted. Team Myeloma Mavericks raises the option of a non-BCMA-directed approach, including GPRC5D-targeted therapy or immunomodulatory and carfilzomib-based combinations, reinforcing that treatment must be individualized rather than forced into a single framework. The segment concludes with the award ceremony, in which Dr. Martin congratulates both teams, summarizes the trade-offs between one-time CAR T-cell therapy with its durability and cure potential and the off-the-shelf accessibility of bispecific antibodies, declares that patients are the true winners, and awards the trophy to the CAR T-cell team on the rationale that patients should first have the opportunity to consider cellular therapy.
Related to this article








