Selinexor/D-Vd Combo Yields Promising Responses and Safety Profile in Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma

Article

A population of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma appeared to benefit from treatment with selinexor plus daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone

A combination of selinexor (Xpovio) plus daratumumab (Darzalex), bortezomib (Velcade), and dexamethasone (D-Vd) yielded positive safety findings and responses in a population of patients with late- and early-relapsed multiple myeloma, according to findings from the open-label, multicenter phase 2 GEM-SELIBORDARA trial (NCT03589222) that were presented at the 2021 American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting and Exposition.

“Treatment of multiple myeloma has significantly evolved in the last decade leading to significant improvements in survival,” said lead investigator Paula Rodriguez-Otero, MD, a specialist in hematology and hemotherapy and coordinator of the Central Unit for Clinical Trials at the University of Navarra, during a presentation of the findings.

“Still, cure remains elusive and new combinations incorporating drugs with novel mechanism of action are needed to rescue patients becoming resistant to standard of care,” she added.

D-Vd is a combination approved in relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) after 1-3 prior lines of therapy. Selinexor, which is an exportin-1 (XPO1) inhibitor, is also approved in combination with dexamethasone for the treatment of penta-exposed RRMM after 1-3 prior lines.

To analyze the effects of D-Vd and selinexor as a combination, investigators treated 57 patients from July 2018 to March 2021. The study was split into 2 parts. Part 1 examined 24 patients with 3 or more prior lines, previously treated with proteasome inhibitor (PI) and immunomodulatory drugs, and refractory to the last line or double refractory. Part 2 looked at 33 patients with RRMM who had 1 or more prior lines.

Patients were given 16mg/kg of intravenous daratumumab at the approved schedule, plus 1.3 mg/m2 bortezomib (on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 in cycle C, 1-8 and days 1 and 15 from C9 onwards), and 40mg dexamethasone (days 1, 8, 15, 22), in combination with selinexor (days 1, 8, 15, and 33). Patients in part 1 were given 100 mg of selinexor while patients in part 2 received 60 mg.

The treatment cycles last 4 weeks in part 1 and 5 weeks in part 2. Investigators continued treatment until a patient had disease progression or experienced unacceptable toxicity. They followed the Declaration of Helsinki and ICHGCP guidelines.

In part 1, in which patients had a median age of 65.5 years and a median of 3 prior lines, 96% (MM refractory to last line) and 71% (double refractory) of patients had MM refractory to lenalidomide and PI. Among them, 21% of patients had high-risk cytogenetics (HR-CA), and 12.5% had R-ISS 3.

The overall response rate (ORR) in part 1 was 50%. A total of 3 patients (12%) achieved complete response/stringent complete response (CR/sCR). At a median follow-up of 28.3 months, 18 patients had discontinued treatment (14 due to disease progression). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 7.1 (95% CI 3.4 – 20.0) and 27.5 months (95% CI 10.6 – NE), respectively.

Part 2 had a median age of 69 years and a median of 1 prior line of therapy(61% had 1) . Similar to part 1, 45% of patients were refractory to lenalidomide — 12% were double refractory and 36% were refractory to last line. There were 5 patients with HR-CA and 3 with R-ISS 3.

At a median follow-up of 9.8 months, 8 patients in part 2 had discontinued treatment (5 due to disease progression). There was an ORR of 82%, and 8 patients (24%) achieved CR/sCR. Median PFS was not yet reached (95% CI 12.1 – NE), while median PFS in lenalidomide-refractory patients included in this part (n=15) was 12.1 months. Median OS was also not yet reached (95% CI NE-NE).

Adverse events (AEs) were manageable. Investigators recommended supportive care to prevent nausea associated with selinexor (with or without anorexia), including ondansetron for 2 days and olanzapine daily.

Seventy-seven percent of patients experienced hematological AEs, including: thrombocytopenia (8.4%; grade 3-4 in 34%), and neutropenia (33%; grade 3-4 in 25%).

Non-hematological AEs were reported in 75% of patients: gastrointestinal toxicity (38%), nausea (28%, 2 grade 3-4), diarrhea (21%; 1 grade 3-4), asthenia (35%; 6 grade 3-4), and peripheral neuropathy (12.3%; 0 grade 3-4).

Dose modifications were required in 35 patients (61.4%), with selinexor being the most likely to be modified (15 in part 1 and 14 in part 2). It was discontinued in 5 patients. Only 1 patient discontinued the study due to AEs. In part 1, 2 patients died.

“All the data in this second cohort is still immature and requires a longer follow-up,” Rodriguez-Otero concluded.

Reference

Rodriguez-Otero P, González-Calle V, Sureda A, et al. Selinexor in Combination with Daratumumab-Bortezomib and Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Relapse or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Initial Results of the Phase 2, Open-Label, Multicenter GEM-Selibordara Study. Presented at: 63rd ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition; December 11-14, 2021. Atlanta, GA. Abstract number 1677.

Related Videos
Barbara Smith, MD, PhD, spoke about the potential use of pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery based on reports from the phase 3 INSITE trial.
Patient-reported symptoms following surgery appear to improve with the use of perioperative telemonitoring, says Kelly M. Mahuron, MD.
Treatment options in the refractory setting must improve for patients with resected colorectal cancer peritoneal metastasis, says Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Although immature, overall survival data from the KEYNOTE-868 trial may support the use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with endometrial cancer.
A panel of 3 experts on multiple myeloma
A panel of 3 experts on multiple myeloma
Dostarlimab plus chemotherapy appears to yield favorable overall survival in patients with mismatch repair proficient endometrial cancer.
Some patients with large B-cell lymphoma may have to travel a great distance for an initial evaluation for CAR T-cell therapy.
Brian Slomovitz, MD, MS, FACOG discusses the use of new antibody drug conjugates for treating patients with various gynecologic cancers.
Education is essential to referring oncologists manage toxicities associated with CAR T-cell therapy for patients with large B-cell lymphoma.
Related Content