scout

Nisha Joseph, MD

Articles by Nisha Joseph, MD

5 panelists

Here, the panel turns to one of the most debated questions surrounding bispecific antibodies: how long should patients remain on therapy? Jagannath raises a scenario involving a patient who achieves MRD-negative complete remission after 1 and 2 years of therapy, prompting discussion about whether to continue, taper, or discontinue treatment.

Panelists discuss successful collaborations between academic centers and community practices in the context of (chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for multiple myeloma, key lessons learned in integrating CAR T therapy into the treatment landscape, and future plans for expanding CAR T therapy’s role in earlier lines of multiple myeloma treatment.

Panelists discuss their institution’s approach to co-management and co-monitoring of (chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) -T patients, strategies to facilitate seamless transitions of care between academic centers and community practices, common challenges in the CAR -T referral process and solutions, and advice for community physicians on the timing and preparation for patient referrals.

Panelists explain how CAR-T cell therapy works and describe the treatment process, discussing whether CAR -T is considered a complex procedure at their institution or if the logistics have been streamlined into clinical workflows, and they also detail their institution's approach to bridging therapy for patients awaiting CAR-T manufacturing and infusion, including whether patients are managed in-house or sent back to community centers.

Panelists discuss which patients are considered for CAR-T therapy in second-line treatment for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM) (cilta-cel vs ide-cel), describe the specific criteria and institutional guidelines used to determine patient eligibility, and explore how non-medical factors like such as location and financial considerations impact patient selection, while also outlining the typical CAR-T referral process from community physician outreach to patient evaluation and selection.

Panelists discuss the data surrounding the use of CAR-T therapy in earlier lines of treatment for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM), including findings from the cilta-cel (Popat R, et al. ASH 2024 No. 1032; Mateos MV, et al. IMS 2024 No. OA-65), and Idel-cel (Ailawadhi S, et al. Blood 2024) studies, and share their thoughts on the implications of these results.

Experts provide extended follow-up on efficacy and safety outcomes with initial therapy combining ponatinib and hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (hyper-CVAD) in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Experts present findings on blinatumomab consolidation therapy from the Phase 3 ECOG-ACRIN E1910 trial in adult patients with newly diagnosed B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia who achieved measurable residual disease-negative remission.

Experts provide the first report of results from the Phase 3 PhALLCON trial comparing initial therapy with ponatinib versus imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.