Videos

Panelists discuss the adoption of 4-drug regimens—including a CD38 monoclonal antibody—as the standard frontline therapy for patients with transplant-eligible multiple myeloma, emphasizing tailored modifications based on age and frailty, and evolving maintenance strategies that incorporate daratumumab to deepen and sustain responses post-transplant.

Panelists discuss how immune cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome data mirrors cytokine release syndrome patterns, with 70% of patients experiencing no neurotoxicity, only 5% to 7% developing grade 3 or higher events, and most toxicities occurring early and resolving within 1 week, further supporting arguments for modified monitoring approaches.

Counseling Patients on ADC Side Effects Patient education is a cornerstone of successful ADC treatment. When introducing ADCs, providers focus on transparency—discussing the most common side effects upfront and reinforcing that many are reversible with dose holds or modifications. Eye toxicities and lung-related side effects like pneumonitis often cause anxiety. Clear communication and reassurance that these can be managed effectively help build trust. Educational materials and follow-up calls ensure patients feel supported and informed. Ultimately, the goal is to empower patients to report symptoms early and remain engaged in their care. ADC therapy offers significant clinical benefit, and with proactive management, patients can achieve extended survival and maintain their quality of life throughout treatment.

Panelists discuss the real-world comparison of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) and idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies for multiple myeloma, highlighting cilta-cel’s superior efficacy but higher toxicity and emphasizing the importance of tailoring treatment decisions to individual patient factors such as disease stage, health status, and personal preferences.

Panelists discuss the transformative impact of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy on treating relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM) in real-world settings, emphasizing improved patient outcomes, the expanding role of real-world evidence, and the nuanced decision-making required in selecting among newly approved, highly effective immunotherapies.

Panelists discuss the manageable safety profile of 4-drug regimens in patients with transplant-eligible multiple myeloma, highlighting dose modifications such as weekly bortezomib and dexamethasone tapering to reduce adverse effects, alongside vigilant infection monitoring to optimize tolerability and quality of life.

Panelists discuss how data from over 1500 patients receiving liso-cel shows consistent cytokine release syndrome (CRS) outcomes between clinical trials and real-world settings, with most CRS events occurring within the first 2 weeks and late-onset events being rare and manageable, supporting potential changes to monitoring protocols.

Panelists discuss how managing ADC-related ocular toxicity requires vigilance through slit-lamp exams and visual acuity testing, with early intervention including treatment holds or dose reductions being essential to prevent long-term damage, while emphasizing the need for collaborative decision-making between oncologists and ophthalmologists to balance cancer control with reversible side effects and maintain patient quality of life.

According to Benjamin J. Golas, MD, PIPAC could be used as a bridging therapy before surgical debulking or between subsequent large surgical operations.

Samuel Rosner, MD, discusses how the treatment landscape for EGFR-mutated non–small cell lung cancer has evolved from first-generation targeted therapies to osimertinib as the current standard of care, while exploring emerging options like fourth-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and bispecific therapies to overcome resistance mechanisms.

Panelists discuss how the evolution of FDA approvals for multiple myeloma therapies reflects rapid innovation and increasing effectiveness, particularly with cell-based treatments.

Panelists discuss how advancements in treatment options, including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, bispecific antibodies, and antibody-drug conjugates, are shaping the current multiple myeloma landscape.

Panelists discuss how the extended median follow-up data from the MonumenTAL-1 trial demonstrate that Q2 weekly dosing of talquetamab shows superior progression-free survival (11.2 vs 7.5 months), duration of response (19.5 vs 7.5 months), and overall survival compared with weekly dosing, with particularly encouraging efficacy in high-risk cytogenetics and older patients while maintaining a manageable safety profile.

Panelists discuss how bispecific antibodies have evolved in relapsed/refractory myeloma treatment, highlighting recent data developments, the importance of NCCN guideline updates, including prophylactic tocilizumab recommendations, and strategies for improving toxicity management and community practice implementation.

Panelists discuss how cytokine release syndrome can be managed through early intervention with tocilizumab and steroids, and emphasize the importance of patient and staff education for safe outpatient administration.

“If you have a [patient in the] fourth or fifth line, [JNJ-5322] could be a valid drug of choice,” said Rakesh Popat, MBBS, PhD, MRCP, FRCPath.

Panelists discuss how talquetamab shows a more favorable safety profile with significantly lower high-grade infection rates compared with B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)–directed bispecifics, although a new cerebellar toxicity signal requires monitoring.

Earlier treatment with daratumumab may be better tolerated for patients with pretreated MRD-negative multiple myeloma.

The trispecific antibody JNJ-5322 demonstrated superior efficacy vs approved agents in multiple myeloma in results shared at the EHA 2025 Congress.

Despite CD19 CAR T-cell therapy exhibiting efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma, less than half achieve long-term remission.

Panelists discuss how the treatment landscape for EGFR-mutant non–small cell lung cancer has evolved to include 3 viable frontline options (osimertinib alone, osimertinib plus chemotherapy, and amivantamab plus lazertinib), with treatment selection based on patient characteristics, preferences, and physician judgment rather than a strict algorithmic approach.

Panelists discuss how a 46-year-old graphic designer with stage IV EGFR-mutant non–small cell lung cancer and brain metastases was successfully treated with amivantamab plus lazertinib after weighing multiple frontline treatment options.

Panelists discuss long-term results from a phase 3 trial comparing luspatercept and epoetin alfa in lower-risk MDS, highlighting luspatercept’s superior efficacy in achieving sustained transfusion independence and the need for further research on earlier intervention strategies.

Panelists discuss the results of the phase 3 EPO-PRETAR trial in a dynamic, debate-style forum on lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes, weighing the benefits of early vs late erythropoiesis-stimulating agent initiation while highlighting the need for more patient-centered outcome measures.

Panelists discussed the persistent risk of interstitial lung disease with trastuzumab deruxtecan, emphasizing the need for early detection through routine imaging, rapid intervention to prevent severe toxicity, and cautious retreatment in select cases where interstitial lung disease was mild and well managed.

“Dendritic cell vaccines, CAR T-cell therapy, and things of that nature are holding some promise,” said Andrew Brenner, MD, PhD.

Panelists discussed how DESTINY-Breast03 firmly established trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) as the second-line standard in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, while early DESTINY-Breast09 data suggest that T-DXd combined with pertuzumab may challenge the CLEOPATRA regimen in the frontline setting, though questions remain about global applicability.

Andrew Brenner, MD, PhD, stated that rhenium obisbemeda elicited similar results in leptomeningeal disease as it did in recurrent glioma.

Panelists discuss how successful ADC administration requires robust coordination between oncology and eye care teams through same-day appointments and shared medical records at academic centers, while emphasizing the need for partnerships with local eye care providers, standardized protocols, and expanded provider education to ensure safe delivery in community settings as more ADCs enter clinical use.

Panelists discuss updated American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) data showing that 4-drug regimens significantly improve outcomes even in patients with transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma, with real-world dose modifications enabling broader use while maintaining efficacy and tolerability.