97 Treatment Discontinuation Among Patients With Stage IV HER2–Negative Breast Cancer

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 40-41

97 Treatment Discontinuation Among Patients With Stage IV HER2–Negative Breast Cancer

97 Treatment Discontinuation Among Patients With Stage IV HER2–Negative Breast Cancer

Background

To describe treatment discontinuation among patients with stage IV HER2-negative (HER2) breast cancer from first to fourth line of treatment (LOT) based on electronic medical records across 3 academic cancer centers in the US.

Materials and Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with stage IV HER2– breast cancer who started their first LOT between 2017 and 2021 at Huntsman Cancer Institute, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, or Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute. Patient data were extracted via chart review. The rate of and reasons for discontinuation were analyzed descriptively. Time to next treatment (TTNT) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods with censoring at the date of the last follow-up or December 31, 2021, whichever earlier.

Results

A total of 232 patients were analyzed with a median age (IQR) of 56.6 years (47.8-67.5). 85.8% had hormone receptor–positive (HR+) breast cancer. At each LOT, less than 75% of patients discontinued, of which 20-30% did not receive a subsequent LOT (1st LOT: 21%; 2nd LOT: 24%; 3L: 32%). Among patients with documented reasons for discontinuation, disease progression was most common at between 67.6% and 79.7%, followed by adverse drug events between 19.6% and 35.1% (Table). TTNT decreased with LOT for patients with HR+ breast cancer from 14.8 months at the first LOT to 7.0 months and 4.4 months at the second and third LOT, respectively, and ranged between 4.1 months to 5.2 months for those with HR-negative breast cancer across LOT.

Table. Reasons for Discontinuation From First to Fourth LOT

Table. Reasons for Discontinuation From First to Fourth LOT

Conclusion

The attrition rate of 20% to 30% of patients who discontinued treatment after each LOT without subsequent treatment was high among patients with stage IV breast cancer. The most effective treatment options should be used in earlier LOT in this patient population since patients may not receive subsequent LOT.

Articles in this issue

TPS 89 A Randomized Phase 3 Study of First-Line Saruparib (AZD5305) Plus Camizestrant Versus CDK4/6i Plus Physician’s Choice Endocrine Therapy or CDK4/6i Plus Camizestrant in Patients With HR+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer With BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2 Mutations (EvoPAR-B)
TPS 89 A Randomized Phase 3 Study of First-Line Saruparib (AZD5305) Plus Camizestrant Versus CDK4/6i Plus Physician’s Choice Endocrine Therapy or CDK4/6i Plus Camizestrant in Patients With HR+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer With BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2 Mutations (EvoPAR-B)
90 Contralateral Risk Reduction Mastectomy in Patients With Unilateral Breast Cancer: A Multinational and Multidisciplinary Survey—Physicians’ Perspective
90 Contralateral Risk Reduction Mastectomy in Patients With Unilateral Breast Cancer: A Multinational and Multidisciplinary Survey—Physicians’ Perspective
91 Adverse Effects and Financial Burden of Radiation Therapy in Patients With T3N0M0 Luminal Breast Cancer
91 Adverse Effects and Financial Burden of Radiation Therapy in Patients With T3N0M0 Luminal Breast Cancer
92 Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging With Indocyanine Green vs Isosulfan Blue for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping: Comparative Cost Analysis in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
92 Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging With Indocyanine Green vs Isosulfan Blue for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping: Comparative Cost Analysis in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
96 Elacestrant Real-World Progression-Free Survival of Adult Patients With ER+/HER2–, Advanced Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Using Insurance Claims in the United States
96 Elacestrant Real-World Progression-Free Survival of Adult Patients With ER+/HER2–, Advanced Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Using Insurance Claims in the United States
97 Treatment Discontinuation Among Patients With Stage IV HER2–Negative Breast Cancer
97 Treatment Discontinuation Among Patients With Stage IV HER2–Negative Breast Cancer
TPS 99 Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label TroFuse-010 Study of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Alone and With Pembrolizumab Versus Treatment of Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Patients With HR+/HER2– Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
TPS 99 Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label TroFuse-010 Study of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Alone and With Pembrolizumab Versus Treatment of Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Patients With HR+/HER2– Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
100 Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Managing Abemaciclib-Associated Adverse Events in Patients With Early/Advanced HR+/HER2– Breast Cancer: A US-Based Health Care Provider Survey
100 Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Managing Abemaciclib-Associated Adverse Events in Patients With Early/Advanced HR+/HER2– Breast Cancer: A US-Based Health Care Provider Survey
102 Novel Prognostic and Predictive Locoregional Biosignature for Risk Stratification of Early-Stage Hormone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer
102 Novel Prognostic and Predictive Locoregional Biosignature for Risk Stratification of Early-Stage Hormone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer
103 Leveraging Digital Technology to Improve Breast Cancer Patients’ Understanding of Treatment Recommendations
103 Leveraging Digital Technology to Improve Breast Cancer Patients’ Understanding of Treatment Recommendations
104 Identification of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Patients With Low-Risk Clinicopathology Who Benefit From Radiation Therapy With and Without Endocrine Therapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery Assessed With the 7-Gene Biosignature
104 Identification of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Patients With Low-Risk Clinicopathology Who Benefit From Radiation Therapy With and Without Endocrine Therapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery Assessed With the 7-Gene Biosignature
TPS 105 ALISertib in Combination With Endocrine Therapy in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer: the Phase 2 ALISCA-Breast1 Study
TPS 105 ALISertib in Combination With Endocrine Therapy in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer: the Phase 2 ALISCA-Breast1 Study
106 Extended Adjuvant Neratinib in HER2+/HR+ Early Breast Cancer in Clinical Routine: Interim Analysis of the Multinational, Prospective, Noninterventional Study ELEANOR (N=300)
106 Extended Adjuvant Neratinib in HER2+/HR+ Early Breast Cancer in Clinical Routine: Interim Analysis of the Multinational, Prospective, Noninterventional Study ELEANOR (N=300)
107 Neratinib-Based Combination Treatments for Patients With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Brain Metastases
107 Neratinib-Based Combination Treatments for Patients With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Brain Metastases

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Photographic and written documentation can help providers recognize inflammatory breast cancer symptoms across diverse populations.
The use of guideline-concordant care in breast cancer appears to be more common in White populations than Black populations.
Strict inclusion criteria may disproportionately exclude racial minority populations from participating in breast cancer trials.
Spatial transcriptomics and multiplex immunohistochemistry from samples may elucidate outcomes for patients who undergo surgical care for cancer.
Future work may focus on optimizing symptom management associated with percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy placement in malignant bowel obstructions.
Post-operative length of stay ranged from 4 to 9 days for patients who underwent percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy for malignant bowel obstructions.
Future research will aim to assess the efficacy of PIPAC-MMC plus systemic therapy vs systemic therapy alone in patients with peritoneal tumors.
Although small incision surgery may serve as a conduit to deliver PIPAC-MMC, it may confer benefits in the staging and treatment of peritoneal tumors.
Patients with peritoneal metastases were historically associated with limited survival and low consideration for clinical trials.
Related Content