Prophylactic Tocilizumab Combo Reduces CRS in Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma

News
Article

Data support prophylactic treatment with tocilizumab as an option to mitigate the risk of CRS for outpatient dosing of teclistamab.

Data support prophylactic treatment with tocilizumab as an option to mitigate the risk of CRS for outpatient dosing of teclistamab.

Data support prophylactic treatment with tocilizumab as an option to mitigate the risk of CRS for outpatient dosing of teclistamab.

Administering prophylactic tocilizumab (Actemra) in combination with teclistamab-cqvy (Tecvayli) reduced the incidence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) compared with teclistamab alone in a small cohort of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, according to updated analysis findings from the phase 1/2 MajesTEC-1 trial (NCT03145181; NCT04557098) presented at the 2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting.1

Any-grade CRS occurred in 25.0% of patients in the prophylactic tocilizumab cohort compared with 72.1% of those who received teclistamab without tocilizumab. Grade 1 and 2 CRS affected 8.3% and 16.7% of patients, respectively, in the prophylactic treatment arm; investigators reported no grade 3 events. The median time to CRS onset in this cohort was 2 days (range, 1-3), and events lasted for a median of 2 days (range, 2-4). Additionally, all instances of CRS were eventually resolved.

The median blood marrow plasma cell (BMPC) concentration was 8.0% (range, 0%-80%) in those without CRS, 19% (range, 8%-30%) in those with grade 1 CRS, and 62.5% (range, 30%-80%) in those with grade 2 events across the prophylactic treatment group. Additionally, most patients in each respective group had stage I disease per the International Staging System assessment (72.2% vs 50.0% vs 50.0%). Although no disease characteristic appeared to correlate with CRS in this cohort, investigators noted that a small sample size may preclude clinically meaningful conclusions.

Any-grade and grade 3/4 infections occurred in 79.2% and 25.0% of patients in the prophylactic treatment group, respectively. Other common any-grade and high-grade events in this group included neutropenia (62.5% vs 62.5%), anemia (58.3% vs 25.0%), and thrombocytopenia (50.0% vs 25.0%). Data showed 1 instance of grade 5 pulmonary embolism at 20 days following the final dose of teclistamab.

“With longer follow-up, there are no new safety signals or impact on response to teclistamab, and further data are needed to inform potential risk factors for higher-grade CRS,” lead study author Niels W.C.J van de Donk, MD, PhD, a professor in Hematology at the Amsterdam University Medical Center in Amsterdam, Netherlands, said in the presentation. “Prophylactic tocilizumab may be considered to mitigate the risk of CRS for outpatient dosing of teclistamab.”

Findings from this presentation pertained to a cohort of 24 patients in the MajesTEC-1 trial after a median follow-up of 8.1 months after treatment with prophylactic tocilizumab. In this cohort, patients received teclistamab at 1.5 mg/kg every week or as a comparable fixed dose following a single dose of tocilizumab and step-up dosing. Patients received tocilizumab at 8 mg/kg intravenously within 4 hours of the initial teclistamab step-up dose.

Patients were also eligible to receive premedication with dexamethasone, acetaminophen (Tylenol), and diphenhydramine (Benadryl) during step-up dosing of teclistamab. Investigators hospitalized patients for 48 hours following each step-up dose and after the first study treatment dose.

The median patient age in the prophylactic tocilizumab cohort was 72 years. Additionally, most patients were male (58.3%), White (79.2%), and had an ECOG performance status of 0 (54.2%). Of note, 20.8% of patients had 1 or more extramedullary plasmacytomas, and 20.8% had BMPC concentrations of 60% or higher. Disease characteristics in this prophylactic treatment cohort were generally comparable with those reported among patients enrolled on the MajesTEC-1 trial overall.

Responses across the prophylactic treatment cohort appeared to be similar to those reported across the overall MajesTEC-1 trial population.2 The objective response rate (ORR) was 72.7% with prophylactic tocilizumab vs 63.0% with teclistamab only. In each respective group, the complete response (CR) or better rate was 18.2% vs 46.1%, the very good partial response (VGPR) rate was 40.9% vs 13.3%, and the PR rate was 13.6% vs 3.6%. Investigators hypothesized that the relatively lower CR or better rate in the prophylactic treatment group may be attributable to a limited number of available bone marrow samples to confirm the CR and follow-up duration.

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) induction in the prophylactic treatment group was typically comparable with that in the general MajesTEC-1 population, although the magnitude of IL-6 induction was more pronounced in the prophylactic treatment group. Additionally, the duration of IL-6 signaling blockade lasted across the period of teclistamab step-up dosing.

References

  1. van de Donk NWCJ, Garfall AL, Benboubker L, et al. Longer-term follow-up of patients (pts) receiving prophylactic tocilizumab (toci) for the reduction of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in the phase 1/2 MajesTEC-1 study of teclistamab in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(suppl 16):7517. doi:10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.7517
  2. Garfall AL, Nooka AK, van de Donk NWCJ, et al. Long-term follow-up from the phase 1/2 MajesTEC-1 trial of teclistamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(suppl 16):7540. doi:10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.7540
Related Videos
A panel of 4 experts on multiple myeloma
A panel of 4 experts on multiple myeloma
Additional analyses of patient-reported outcomes and MRD status in the QuANTUM-First trial are also ongoing, says Harry P. Erba, MD, PhD.
Investigators must continue to explore the space for lisocabtagene maraleucel in mantle cell lymphoma, according to Manali Kamdar, MD.
Those with CML should discuss adverse effects such as nausea or fatigue with their providers to help optimize their quality of life during treatment.
A panel of 4 experts on multiple myeloma
A panel of 4 experts on multiple myeloma
Patients with CML can become an active part of their treatment plan by discussing any questions that come to mind with their providers.
A panel of 4 experts on multiple myeloma
Video 1 - 4 KOLs are featured in "Treating Patients Referred to Academic Centers for CAR T"
Related Content